blogger delicious digg diigo facebook googleplus linkedin netlog reddit twitter
Skip Navigation LinksJRI > Archive > April-June 2001, Volume 2, Issue 2 > Determination of rubella virus antibodies in pregnant women referring to Kerman Maternity Hospitals in 1999

Volume 2, Issue 2, Number 6 / April-June
(pages 22-28)

Determination of rubella virus antibodies in pregnant women referring to Kerman Maternity Hospitals in 1999

 Corresponding Author
Department of Obstet . and Gynecol, Faculty of Medicine, Kerman Medical Sciences University , Kerman, Iran

Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences University, Tehran, Iran

Related Articles
in Google Scholar in PubMed


Other Format
pdfPDF Full Text (En) pdfPDF Full Text (Fa) pdfePUB Full Text (En) pdfPDF Abstract (En) pdfPDF Abstract (Fa) pdf BibTeX pdfRefMan pdfEndNote xmlPMC XML online readerPMC Reader online readerPMC Reader online readerHBIs XML


Rubella is a viral infection. If it occurs during pregnancy, it’s responsible for serious fetal problems. Thus identification and vaccination of sensitive women is very important. This study was done for identification of protective rubella antibody titer (15mIU/ml) in 410 women of maternity hospitals in Kerman city. They were selected among who referred to maternity hospitals in Kerman. Randomized blood samples were collected and evaluated for rubella virus antibodies by ELISA method. Data analysis was done by chi-square test, Fisher exact test and student t-test. Protective rubella antibody titer was positive in 94.6% and negative in only 5.4%. Negative antibody titer in working wives (11.5%) was more than housewives (4.3%) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in presence of antibody in regard with age, job, resident place, history of vaccination against rubella and history of rubella infection in herself or her family. Despite of high percent of immunity against rubella among women, it seems protection against it, is not enough. Therefor national vaccination plan was recommended for young women and adults which are not pregnant, or have no plan for getting pregnant 3 months after vaccination, and those who have low immunity against rubella.

Keywords: Antibody titer, Pregnant women, Vaccination

To cite this article:

  1. Nategh R, Marashi M. The effects of rubella viruses and Cytomegalovirus on congenital defects in Tehran. MSc thesis of Tarbiat Modares University. 1991.
  2. Cunnigham, Mac Donald, et al. Williams obstertrics 20th Edition. Appleton & Lange, 1997; 1301-3.
  3. Center of Diseases Control (CDC). Rubella prevention: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR. 1990; 39 (15): 1-18.
  4. Mousavi M. The employing of Hemagglutination prevention test and Immuno floresent test to determination of rubella virus antibody titers in cord blood. MSc thesis of Tarbiat Modares University. 1997.
  5. اEslamian L. Assessment of immunity to rubella in pregnant women attending prenatal clinic of Shariati Hospital. Proceedings of the Third Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 1997. p. 19-23.
  6. Pakzad P. Evaluation of immune status to rubella in women of reproductive age and pregnant women living in Ahwaz. J Ahvaz Univ Med Sci. 1987;5,6.
  7. Ghafourian M, Pakzadeh P. Evaluation Of rubella in pregnant women and children with congenital rubella in Khuzestan Province. J Ahvaz Univ Med Sci. 1990;19.
  8. Gebresdassie L., Abebe A. The immune status of young adult females in Ethiopia to ruberlla virus infection. Bull WHO. 1985; 63(5): 927-30.
  9. Abuharfeil N.M., Shabsauq B. The immune status of young Adult of rubella virus in northern Jordan. Ann Sauof Med. 1991; 11(1): 54-7.
  10. Hossain A. Seroepidemiology of rubella in Saudi Arabia. J Trop Pediat. 1989; 35(4): 169-70.
  11. Gudmund Sdottir S., Antonsgdottir A. Prevention of congenital rubella in Iceland by antibody screcning and Immunization of seronegative females. Bull WHO. 1985; 63 (1):83-92.
  12. Ferson M.J., Robertson P.W. Cost effectiveness of prevaccination screening of health care workers for immunity to measles, rubella and mumps. J Med. 1994; 160(8):478-82.
  13. Richard L., Hodinka. Child hood infections in Gregory. A Storch Essentials of diagnostic virology. New York. Churchill living stone. 2000; 173-5.
  14. Iin D.B., Chen C.J. Current epidemiology of rubella virus infection among female residents in Taiwan. J Med Virol. 1993; 41(2):174-8.
  15. Fraser V., Spitznagel E. Results of a rubella screening program of hospital employees: A Five –year review 1986-90. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 138 (9): 756-64.
  16. Vulver A.S. The prevalence of antibodies against rubella in pregnant women of a health center in Valencia. Aten Primaria. 1999; 23:429-33.
  17. Black F.L., Berman L.L. Geographic Variation in infant loss of maternal antibody and prevalence of rubella antibody. Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 124 (3): 442-52.
  18. Fieds B.N. Field’s virology 3rd Edition. Lippincott-Raven Publishers. 1996; vol:1 chap: 29.
  19. Colpepper L., Brian W.J. Preconception care in complication of pregnancy, medical surgical gynecologic, psychological and prenatal. 4th Edition. William & wilkins. 1991; vol 1: chap:4.

Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and copyrighted by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2016 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.