ARI 
 JRI 
 ISERB 
blogger delicious digg diigo facebook googleplus linkedin netlog reddit twitter
Skip Navigation LinksJRI > Archive > October-December 2012, Volume 13, Issue 4 > Current Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, A Major Cause of Infertility



Volume 13, Issue 4, Number 53 / October-December
(Original Article, pages 204-210)


Current Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, A Major Cause of Infertility


PMID: 23926547 (PubMed) - PMCID: PMC3719340


 Corresponding Author
Department of Health Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India

Department of Health Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India

Department of Health Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India

Department of Health Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India

1- Seth G S Medical College and KEM Hospital, J M Street, Parel, Mumbai, India
2- Seven Hills Hospital, Mumbai, India

Received: 2/28/2012 Accepted: 6/23/2012

Related Articles
in Google Scholar in PubMed

 

Other Format
pdfPDF Full Text (En) pubreader PubReader pdfePUB Full Text (En) pdfPDF Abstract (En) pdfPDF Abstract (Fa) pdf BibTeX pdfRefMan pdfEndNote xmlPMC XML online readerPMC Reader

 


Abstract
Background: In India, the impact of current Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) in reproductive health remains a neglected area of investigation. The present study evaluates if current Chlamydia infection is associated with any clinical complication that needs the attention of clinical investigators. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 896 women attending the Gynecology Out Patient for the detection of C. trachomatis infection. Polymerase chain reaction was used to diagnose current C. trachomatis infection and ELISA for past infections. Bacterial vaginosis, Candida and Trichomonas were screened. The results of symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were compared. The data was analyzed using Epi Info version 6 and "Z" test. A probability value of p≤0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant association between current C. trachomatis infection with infertility when comparing infected fertile (18.6% vs. 9.4%, odds ratio: 2.19, p<0.0005) and uninfected infertile women (45.6% vs. 27.3%, odds ratio: 2.24, p<0.0001). Average infection rate was 12.1%, highest in women with infertility (18.6%) or with ectopic pregnancy (25%). Significant proportions of infected women with infertility (p<0.01) or with recent pregnancy (p<0.001) were asymptomatic. Follow up of infected women who became negative after treatment [28 women from infertility group and 9 women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA)] revealed live birth in 8 (21.6%) women within one year, 4 with infertility and 4 with RSA. Conclusion: Study findings suggests, association between current C. trachomatis infection and infertility. Absence of signs and symptoms associated with this infection highlights its diagnosis in women with a history of infertility and RSA for their better management, as revealed by live births with one year of follow up.

Keywords: Asymptomatic, Chlamydia infections, Current, Infertility


To cite this article:


Full Text
Introduction
Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of sexually transmitted Chlamydia infection has become an important public health priority especially, by strong evidence linking this infection with HIV transmission (1). Consequences of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) infection are more damaging to the reproductive health of women than to men. A number of clinical conditions like mucopurulent endocervicites, endometritis or salpingitis have been attributed to this infection. The potentially serious sequelae of cervical infection with C. trachomatis includes infertility, ectopic pregnancy, pelvic pain and recurrent pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) (2-4). However, all the infected individuals do not develop such complications or symptoms, as only a fraction get upper genital tract infection and a subset of them manifest complications leading to infertility and ectopic pregnancy (5, 6). Direct and indirect costs of chlamydial infections are substantial, justifying more attention and a stronger multidisciplinary approach. Cates and Wasserheit reviewed a large number of studies showing statistically significant association between tubal factor infertility, spontaneous abortion (SA) and ectopic pregnancy with previous systemic chlamydial infection identified by the presence of C. trachomatis specific antibody (7). Reports are also available on the prevalence of current C. trachomatis infection in women with different clinical conditions like infertility and genitourinary complaints (8-10); however, there is not much reports on its association with infertility or related clinical complications. Evaluation of present infection with the aforesaid types of manifestations could help in treatment. In India, the clinical manifestations or sequelae associated with current C. trachomatis infection, is yet to be considered as a major health problem and clinician rarely refer any subject for its diagnosis. Hence, the present study aims to assess whether current C. trachomatis infection is associated with any complications in Indian women that needs to be highlighted for its clinical investigation.

Methods
Subjects: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled women attending the Gynecology Out Patient Department (OPD) of Seth G.S. Medical College and King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, between 2003 to 2009. The group comprised of women with histories of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA, n=143), infertility (n=264), symptoms and signs of lower genital tract infections (LGTI, n=213), pregnant women (n=174) attending the antenatal care (ANC) unit, as well as those who had no symptoms and signs of any infection (asymptomatic controls, n=102) but came for family planning advice.
Ethics Committees of the institute, as well as of KEM Hospital approved the study. Each woman was informed about the study and written consent was obtained from all the women before enrollment.
Specimens: The clinician team did a routine gynecological per speculum examination to record signs of infection and collected endocervical and vaginal swab specimens. First, endocervical swab (Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Limited, Mumbai, India) specimens were collected in a sterile container with 1ml PBS (pH=7.5) for immediate processing to detect C. trachomatis infection, while second specimens were stored in dry sterile vials at -20 ºC for confirmatory tests, if required. Vaginal specimens were also collected from the posterior fornix using a wooden spatula for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) using Nugent's scoring system for Gram stain smears (11) and for the detection of trichomonas and candida by wet mount. Blood specimens collected from the women were used for antibody test using commercially available ELISA kit (Novatech Immunodiagnostica, GMBH).
Adequacy of specimens: In order to check specimen adequacy, each cervical specimen in PBS was vortexed for 30 s, the swab was squeezed and 10 μl of specimen was examined under microscope to see the presence of epithelial cells. Four to five epithelial cells per high power field was considered as an adequately collected specimen for further processing.
Signs and symptoms of reproductive tract infections: Severely eroded cervix with hypertrophic cervical erosions and a mucopurulent endocervical discharge or leucorrhoea were recorded as signs while burning micturation and pain in the abdomen reported by the women were recorded as symptoms.
Extraction of DNA: DNA was isolated from cervical specimen using a rapid non-enzymatic method. The cells were pelleted and resuspended in Tris-MgCl2-KCl buffer (pH=7.4) and treated with 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate at 55 ºC for 10 min to lyse the cells. The proteins were precipitated using saturated sodium chloride solution. DNA was precipitated by 100% ethanol and eluted in Tris EDTA buffer (12). The quantity and quality of DNA was estimated spectrophotometrically and by loading an aliquot of DNA on 0.8% agarose gel. As an internal control PCR for betaglobin gene was also performed for each sample to rule out the presence of inhibitory factors in the extracted specimens.
PCR for diagnosis of C. trachomatis: PCR was performed on extracted DNA using primers designed from the conserved region of MOMP gene of C. trachomatis with sense primer: 5' GCC GCT TTG AGT TCT GCT TCC 3' and antisense primer: 5' GTC GAA AAC AAA GTC ACC ATA GTA 3' to amplify a 180 bp DNA fragment common to all serotypes (13). The reaction was carried out in a volume of 50 l. It contained primers (0.5 m each), 0.2 mM dNTP’s, PCR buffer (10 mM Tris buffer; pH=9), 1.25 units of Taq polymerase, 10 l of DNA specimen and the volume was adjusted with sterile distilled water. Positive and negative controls were also run in each experiment. Reaction was performed in a thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer 2400) as per the following protocol: initial denaturation was done for 5 min at 94 °C. This was followed by 35 cycles of 30 s each of denaturation at 94 °C, annealing at 55 °C and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The final extension step was carried out at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified products were run on 2% Agarose gel, observed under a UV transilluminator while the results were being documented. Presence of 180 bp repeat sequences in positive control specimen and its absence in the negative control indicated reaction had been completed satisfactorily. Presence of 180 bp repeat sequences in other clinical specimens indicated presence of C. trachomatis infection. Further confirmation of these amplified products was carried out using specific C. trachomatis probe in Southern hybridization (14). Probe was prepared using PCR diglabeling kit (Roche diagnostics). Standard protocol for Southern blotting was followed for transfer of PCR products to a nylon membrane, which was then processed for hybridization using a generic probe. Instruction manual was followed to detect the probe complex using Digluminescence detection kit (Roche diagnostics).
Detection of C. trachomatis IgG antibody: Commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used to detect C. trachomatis specific IgG antibody (NovaTec Immunodiagnostica, GMBH). In brief, microtitre wells precoated with C. trachomatis antigens were incubated with serum specimen at a 1:100 dilution so that any corresponding antibodies present in the serum would bind to the antigen to form complexes. After washing the wells to remove all unbound sample material, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeled antihuman IgG conjugate was added which would bind to captured Chlamydia specific antibodies. The immune complex formed by the bound conjugate was visualized by adding tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate, which gives a blue colored reaction product.
After terminating the reaction using a stop solution (Sulphuric acid, 0.2 mol/l), the absorbance of the end product, which is yellow in color, was read at 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader (μ Quant, Bio-Tek Instruments Inc.). The intensity of this product is directly proportional to the amount of Chlamydia-specific IgG antibodies in the specimen. The specimens with O.D. higher than the cut-off value (0.250-0.900) were considered positive for Chlamydia-specific antibodies and used as an indicator of past Chlamydia infection. Each positive sample was again confirmed using another serum aliquot of the same participant. The results were found to be reproducible.
Follow up of C. trachomatis positive cases: Counseled each enrolled women to come back to take the report. Those found to be infected with any of these infections were treated by the clinician.
Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis using Epi Info version 6 software for Chi-squares (2) test was applied to study the association between C. trachomatis infection with the clinical manifestations. The test of significance for proportion between different groups was carried out using "Z" test. A probability value of p≤0.05 was considered as significant.

Results
Study subjects: Eight hundred and ninety-six women were tested for current C. trachomatis infection by PCR. The participants were between 16 to 45 years old with a median age of 29 yrs, and an interquartile range (IQR) value of 10. They belonged to middle socio-economic groups and their personal history did not reveal any high risk behavior. The number of women in asymptomatic control group, as well as those in groups with different clinical histories like RSA, infertility, with lower genital tract infection (LGTI), pregnant women from antenatal care (ANC) centers, their age and the infection rate in each group is presented in table 1.
In the RSA group, there were 58 women with 2 pregnancy losses (2SA), 77 women with more than 3 pregnancy losses (>3SA) and 8 with ectopic pregnancy. In the ANC group, the gestational period of the pregnant women varied from 2 to 4 months. There were 108 (12.1%) women with current C. trachomatis, indicating the prevalence of this infection in the study population.
Presence of other reproductive tract infections and past C. trachomatis infection: Of the 108 C. trachomatis infected women, 4 (3.7%) had concomitant BV while 1 (0.9%) had concomitant Candida albicans. In the rest of participants (n=788), C. trachomatis specific antibody was present in 14 women, one woman had both the antibody and the antigen. Eighty women had other infections such as BV, Candida or Trichomonas infections and the related infection rates were 14.5%, 4.3% and 0.9%, respectively. For further analysis, these women with C. trachomatis antibody (n=15), as well as those with other infections (n=80) were excluded. Hence, there were 693 women without any infection, who were taken into consideration for comparative analysis (Table 2).
Sequelae, symptoms and signs associated with current C. trachomatis: Infection rate varied from 1.96% to 25.0% among the different groups of participants (Table1). Among the RSA subgroup a significant (p<0.001) proportion of women with ectopic pregnancy (25%) and with more than 2 spontaneous abortions (10.4%) had this infection, compared to women with 2 spontaneous abortions (5.2%). C. trachomatis infection rate was significantly low in the group of women with children or expecting a child such as asymptomatic controls (n=102), LGTI (n=213) or in ANC (n=174) groups, {9.4% (46 of 489); odds ratio: 2.19, p<0.0005)} when compared to infected infertile women (18.6%, 49 of 264). Comparison of clinical manifestation of women with only current C. trachomatis infection (n=103) with that of uninfected women (n=693) revealed significant association of C. trachomatis infection with infertility (45.6% vs. 27.3%, p=0.0001; Table 2). Another significant observation was the absence of any symptoms or signs on per speculum examination in infertile (64% vs. 36%, p<0.01) and pregnant (79.2% vs. 22.8%, p0.001) infected women, indicating asymptomatic nature of this infection (Figure 1).
Age associated with current C. trachomatis infection: C. trachomatis infection was highest (21.8%) among women 20 years old or younger, though not statistically significant, and lowest in 21-25 year old age group. The infection rate again showed an increasing trend in women above 26-40 years of age.
Association of current C. trachomatis infection with vaginal pH/Microscopic analysis (>10PMNs) /Colour of swab/Bleeds on touch: Among the C. trachomatis infected women, (20.2%) had high pH (>5), (47.7%) had more than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) in their specimens, 2.7% had yellow/grayish coloured discharge and 7.3% had blood on swab or bled during collection of specimens.
Follow up of C. trachomatis positive cases: Seventy-two women with C. trachomatis infection came for the report, which were subsequently treated. Follow up record on 60 women was available only for one year. Thereafter, they could not be traced due to several reasons. In ANC group, 8 of 24 C. trachomatis positive pregnant women came for follow up and were treated. No further testing was done in these pregnant women after completion of treatment in accordance with the clinician advice to avoid any risk during pregnancy. These eight women had live births. Result of follow up in other groups revealed that four of the 52 infected individuals were positive even after treatment. There were eight live births in these groups following treatment (Table 2). Women with other infections such as BV, Candida and Trichomonas were also treated as per hospital routine procedure.

Discussion
Results revealed statistically significant association between current C. trachomatis infection with clinical manifestations or sequelae like infertility in women in Mumbai, India. Women with confounding variables such as other abnormalities or infections were excluded from comparisons. In our study, we excluded women positive for C. trachomatis antibody from analysis as presence of C .trachomatis antibody is known to be associated with tubal factor infertility, spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy (7). A recent report in Ghanaian women, also highlighted the presence of Chlamydia-specific IgG (39%) and IgA (14%) antibodies indicating previous C. trachomatis infections among women with primary or secondary infertility compared to current infection (2.4%) (15). Further, C. trachomatis infected women with coinfections were also excluded from the study so that a direct correlation could be made between current C. trachomatis infection with its clinical manifestations. In the present study, comparative analysis between women with or without C. trachomatis with different types of clinical manifestations, showed a statistically significant association between current C. trachomatis infection with infertility.
The average infection rate was 12.1%. This high rate of infection might be due to the inclusion of women with specific clinical history like infertility, ectopic pregnancy, as well as women with more than two spontaneous abortions. Previous studies in the local population have shown a low infection rate among women with infertility (2.5%) which might have been due to the use of less sensitive techniques like ELISA (16). Our previous study using the same method (ELISA) also showed a similar infection rate (1.7%) in asymptomatic controls, while the present rate (18.6%) of infection in women with infertility using PCR was high compared to 14.3% of women with infertility published earlier using ELISA (17). Another study from Mumbai reported high rates of infection (23.2%) in female sex workers using ELISA (18), indicating presence of this infection in the local population. Moreover, women with infertility and recurrent spontaneous abortions might be more sexually active to conceive leading to high infection rates. Other studies in women from northern Indian also revealed similar high infection rates (27%, 20 of 74) in women with primary infertility as detected by culture or antigen test (8). High prevalence rate (43.1%) of C. trachomatis was also seen in women (n=430) with genitourinary complaints, even among the slum dwellers (15.3%, n=53) compared to 9.39% observed in our women with LGTI (10). Report also revealed high rates of Chlamydia infection in women with infertility (36%, n=169), compared to our observation of 18.6% (9). Provision of free treatment and access to health care system might be responsible for the comparatively low infection rate seen in this western region of the country.
Significant proportion of women with ectopic pregnancy and more than two spontaneous abortions had current C. trachomatis infection, which might be the etiology for the aforesaid disorders as reported earlier (7, 19). However, these reports suggest association of C. trachomatis antibody or its past infections with these types of manifestations, whereas our results showed its association, i.e.; one fourth of ectopic pregnancies with current C. trachomatis infection, supporting the recent review which attributes one- third of ectopic pregnancies to chlamydial infection (2).
Age-wise distribution of study population with C. trachomatis infection revealed that a high proportion of women younger than 20 years of age had this infection, which is in harmony with other reports that Chlamydia infection rates are inversely related to age (5-7, 20, 21). In the present study, a unique trend between infection rate and age was observed.
This infection was mostly asymptomatic; women only came to the clinics when they developed complications such as signs and symptoms of lower genital tract infection, experienced repeated pregnancy loss, and had infertility at later age; thus, present observation revealed an increasing rate of infection with age.
A year of follow up of the treated women was followed by the pregnancy and subsequent live birth in four women with infertility and four women with RSA indicating the association of this infection for such types of manifestations.
Asymptomatic nature of these manifestations also correlated with earlier reports (22, 23). Some studies have shown that a count of <10 PMNs per high power field was defined as predicting absence of gonococci and C. trachomatis (24, 25) but only 47.7% of the infected women from the study group had a count of >10 PMNs/hpf. Absence of increased number of PMNs in the rest might be associated with asymptomatic nature of disease manifestations in these women.
We could not establish the cause of high pH of vaginal secretion in 20% of the C. trachomatis infected cases as only 3.7% had BV infection. Hence, our attempt to correlate C. trachomatis infection with any changes in vaginal pH, any changes in the colour of swab collected or bleeding while collecting specimen was futile.
In C. trachomatis negative women, the rate of other infections like BV, Candida and Trichomonas correlated well with a previous study conducted in Mumbai where the infection rate of BV, Candida and Trichomonas were, 13% (58/446), 0.9% (4/446) and 0.5% (2/446), respectively (26). Infection such as candidiasis (4.3%) was expected to be more common in Mumbai in view of poor and unsatisfactory housing conditions under which many of them lived but this condition was not observed. Even existence of common RTIs along with C. trachomatis infection was observed to be low in this clinic based prevalence study.
These findings could suggest, statistically significant association between current C. trachomatis infection with infertility and immunity to infection which might be correlated to sperm rejection in women leading to infertility.
The limitation of the study was follow up of enrolled women only up to one year. The enrolled women could not be contacted due to frequent change of their phone number.
Absence of signs and symptoms in significant proportions of currently infected women, as well as high infection rate in the younger age group emphasizes the need for C. trachomatis diagnosis. Current C. trachomatis infection could be involved in the etiology of infertility and its treatment will help in positive pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion
Study findings suggest, statistically significant association between current C. trachomatis infection with infertility. Absence of signs and symptoms associated with this infection highlights the need for its investigation in women with a history of infertility and RSA for their better management, as revealed by live birth with one year of follow up.

Acknowledgement
We thank all the staff members who helped us in this work and the National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health for their support. We thank WHO for providing financial support through WHO-Country budget, as well as partial support from ICMR Adhoc Research Grant5/7/ 129/05-RHN to carry out the study.

Conflict of Interest

There was no conflict of interest in this article.





Figures, Charts, Tables


Figure 1. Sequelae associated with C. trachomatis infection, with or without symptoms and signs 
*p>0.05; #p<0.01; †p<0.001, LGTI=Lower genital tract infection; RSA=Repeated spontaneous abortion; ANC= Antenatal case. Percentage of subjects=Percentage of infected women in each group of women with different manifestations
Figure 1. Sequelae associated with C. trachomatis infection, with or without symptoms and signs *p>0.05; #p<0.01; †p<0.001, LGTI=Lower genital tract infection; RSA=Repeated spontaneous abortion; ANC= Antenatal case. Percentage of subjects=Percentage of infected women in each group of women with different manifestations



Table 1. Defined groups of participant (count and age) and C. trachomatis infection rate

*p<0.001, 
Notes: Asymptomatic=Healthy women without any sign or symptoms of any infection or disease; LGTI=Lower genital tract infections; RSA=Recurrent spontaneous abortion; Infertility=Women unable to conceive after two years of cohabitation with husband; ANC=Antenatal cases or pregnant women; SA=Spontaneous abortion
Table 1. Defined groups of participant (count and age) and C. trachomatis infection rate *p<0.001, Notes: Asymptomatic=Healthy women without any sign or symptoms of any infection or disease; LGTI=Lower genital tract infections; RSA=Recurrent spontaneous abortion; Infertility=Women unable to conceive after two years of cohabitation with husband; ANC=Antenatal cases or pregnant women; SA=Spontaneous abortion



Table 2. Frequency of clinical manifestations with or without current C. trachomatis infection in women who did not have any other infection and their treatment outcome
Notes: Infertility=Women unable to conceive after two years of cohabitation with husband; RSA=Recurrent spontaneous abortion; ANC=Antenatal cases or pregnant women; LGTI=Lower genital tract infections; Asymptomatic controls=Healthy women without any sign or symptoms of any infection or disease
Table 2. Frequency of clinical manifestations with or without current C. trachomatis infection in women who did not have any other infection and their treatment outcome Notes: Infertility=Women unable to conceive after two years of cohabitation with husband; RSA=Recurrent spontaneous abortion; ANC=Antenatal cases or pregnant women; LGTI=Lower genital tract infections; Asymptomatic controls=Healthy women without any sign or symptoms of any infection or disease


References
  1. Grosskurth H, Mosha F, Todd J, Mwijarubi E, Klokke A, Senkoro K, et al. Impact of improved treatment of sexually transmitted diseases on HIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1995;346(8974):530-6.   [PubMed]
  2. Bébéar C, de Barbeyrac B. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(1):4-10.   [PubMed]
  3. Darville T, Hiltke TJ. Pathogenesis of genital tract disease due to Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis. 2010;201 Suppl 2:S114-25.   [PubMed]
  4. Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, Low N, Xu F, Ness RB. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J Infect Dis. 2010;201 Suppl 2:S134-55.   [PubMed]
  5. Stamm WE. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the adult. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, editors. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999. p. 407-22.
  6. Schachter J, Stoner E, Moncada J. Screening for chlamydial infections in women attending family planning clinics. West J Med. 1983;138(3):375-9.   [PubMed]
  7. Cates W Jr, Wasserheit JN. Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(6 Pt 2):1771-81.   [PubMed]
  8. Malik A, Jain S, Hakim S, Shukla I, Rizvi M. Chlamydia trachomatis infection & female infertility. Indian J Med Res. 2006;123(6):770-5.   [PubMed]
  9. Mittal A, Kapur S, Gupta S. Screening for genital chlamydial infection in symptomatic women. Indian J Med Res. 1993;98:119-23.   [PubMed]
  10. Singh V, Rastogi S, Garg S, Kapur S, Kumar A, Salhan S, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending a gynecology outpatient department in India. Acta Cytol. 2002;46 (3):540-4.   [PubMed]
  11. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297-301.   [PubMed]
  12. Lahiri DK, Nurnberger JI Jr. A rapid non-enzymatic method for the preparation of HMW DNA from blood for RFLP studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(19):5444.   [PubMed]
  13. Stephens RS, Mullenbach G, Sanchez-Pescador R, Agabian N. Sequence analysis of the major outer membrane protein gene from Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2. J Bacteriol. 1986;168(3): 1277-82.   [PubMed]
  14. Mania-Pramanik J, Potdar S, Kerkar S. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J Clin Lab Anal. 2006;20(1):8-14.   [PubMed]
  15. Siemer J, Theile O, Larbi Y, Fasching PA, Danso KA, Kreienberg R, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for infertility among women in Ghana, West Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78(2):323-7.   [PubMed]
  16. Chandhok N, Datey S, Gaur LN, Saxena NC. Prevalence of chlamydia trachomatis in women attending different clinics at tertiary hospitals. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2003;53(5):463-7.
  17. Mania-Pramanik J, Meherji P, Gokral J, Donde U. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an urban setting. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77(2):141.   [PubMed]
  18. Divekar AA, Gogate AS, Shivkar LK, Gogate S, Badhwar VR. Disease prevalence in women attending the STD clinic in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11(1):45-8.   [PubMed]
  19. Witkin SS, Ledger WJ. Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in sera of women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(1):135-9.   [PubMed]
  20. Schachter J. Infection and disease epidemiology. In: Stephens RS, editor. Chlamydia intracellular biology, pathogenesis, and immunity. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1999. p. 139-69.
  21. Thompson SE, Washington AE. Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Epidemiol Rev. 1983;5:96-123.   [PubMed]
  22. Sellors JW, Mahony JB, Chernesky MA, Rath DJ. Tubal factor infertility: an association with prior chlamydial infection and asymptomatic salpingitis. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(3):451-7.   [PubMed]
  23. Osser S, Persson K, Liedholm P. Tubal infertility and silent chlamydial salpingitis. Hum Reprod. 1989;4(3):280-4.   [PubMed]
  24. Moscicki B, Shafer MA, Millstein SG, Irwin CE Jr, Schachter J. The use and limitations of endocervical Gram stains and mucopurulent cervicitis as predictors for Chlamydia trachomatis in female adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(1):65-71.   [PubMed]
  25. Eltabbakh GH, Eltabbakh GD, Broekhuizen FF, Griner BT. Value of wet mount and cervical cultures at the time of cervical cytology in asymptomatic women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(4):499-503.   [PubMed]
  26. Brabin L, Gogate A, Gogate S, Karande A, Khanna R, Dollimore N, et al. Reproductive tract infections, gynaecological morbidity and HIV seroprevalence among women in Mumbai, India. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(3):277-87.   [PubMed]



Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and copyrighted by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2016 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.