ARI 
 JRI 
 ISERB 
blogger delicious digg diigo facebook googleplus linkedin netlog reddit twitter
Skip Navigation Links



Volume 21, Issue 2, Number 83 / April-June
(Original Article, pages 87-93)


A Study on the Presence of Osteopontin and α3β1 Integrin in the Endometrium of Diabetic Rats at the Time of Embryo Implantation




Isfahan Medical Student Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

1- Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

 Corresponding Author
Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 4/24/2019 Accepted: 9/8/2019

Related Articles
in Google Scholar in PubMed

 

Other Format
pdfPDF Full Text (En) pdfPDF Full Text (Fa) pdfePUB Full Text (En) pdfPDF Abstract (En) pdfPDF Abstract (Fa) pdf BibTeX pdfRefMan pdfEndNote xmlPMC XML online readerPMC Reader online readerPMC Reader online readerHBIs XML

 


Abstract

Background: Embryo implantation is a critical and multifactorial phenomenon which can be affected by any alteration in molecular micro construction of endometrium. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of diabetes on osteopontin (OPN) and α3β1 integrin proteins level at the time of endometrial receptivity.
Methods: Twenty-eight female rats were divided into control, diabetic, pioglitazone-treated and metformin-treated groups. Western blot was performed to determine the OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins in rats’ endometrium at the time of implantation. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: OPN increased significantly in the diabetic group in comparison with control (p<0.001), metformin-treated (p=0.008) and pioglitazone-treated groups (p<0.001). Furthermore, α3β1 integrin protein level in diabetic group had a significant difference in comparison with that of the control (p<0.001), metformin-treated (p=0.026) and pioglitazone-treated groups (p<0.001).
Conclusion: OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins are involved in embryo implantation and their changes in diabetic condition can affect fertility. Treatment with pioglitazone and metformin improved the level of OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins while pioglitazone was more effective.



Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, Endometrium, Osteopontin, α3β1 integrin


To cite this article:


Full Text

Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM)  and its complications are going to be a serious health issue around the world (1) with a high prevalence in Asia (2). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for more than 90% of all cases of DM and its prevalence is rapidly increasing universally (2). DM, as a metabolic disorder, is a chronic condition which causes serious complications in various organs such as nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, stroke and myocardial infarction (3). In addition to the complications mentioned above, DM also affects the male and female reproductive system and it can reduce the rate of fertility and increase reproductive problems (4). The prevalence of infertility has been reported differently all over the world, but it involves  8-12% of all couples in the world (5). 
Infertility is a complicated and multifactorial disorder and nearly 15% to 30% of  couples are diagnosed with unexplained infertility (6). There are several potential reasons for unexplained infertility and  failure in implantation is one of the most important causes for the problem (7). In women with DM, the rate of pregnancy is lower than that of healthy and non-diabetic women (4). According to literature review, fertility could be severely affected by diabetes mellitus from embryo implantation phase until the birth (8, 9).
Blastocyst implantation is a process in which the trophoblast cooperates with endometrial epithelial cells (10). Implantation begins with a weak and feeble connection between the embryo and endometrium, which leads to binding and penetration into the endometrial tissue (11). Diabetes mellitus can alter the molecular pathways in the female reproductive system, therefore  leading to the disruption of implantation process and subsequently loss of the fetus (12). The pattern of integrin proteins expression has a significant relationship with fertility and implantation process (13, 14). 
The rate of spontaneous abortion increases in women with uncontrolled hyperglycemia (15, 16). Implantation of the embryo in the uterus requires the cross talk and concurrency of several molecules. In  this phenomenon, different adherent molecules, such as integrins and osteopontin are involved (17). 
These adhesion molecules are regularly expressed at the time of endometrial receptivity which ultimately could lead to a successful implantation (18, 19). Integrins are a member of heterodimeric transmembrane glycoproteins. Their bio-construction is formed by non-covalent connection of α and β subunits. Each α or β subunit consists of an extracellular domain, an intracellular domain and a transmembrane portion (20). These adhesion molecules facilitate cell attachment and connect extracellular matrix to specific ligands such as collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin and osteopontin (21). Integrin α3β1 is continuously expressed during a normal menstrual period and has the role as a receptor for collagen and osteopontin in the extracellular matrix (20). 
Osteopontin, or secreted phospho¬protein 1 (SPP1) is an acidic, single chain, phosphorylated glycoprotein which is produced by various cells such as mesenchymal stem cells (22), epithelial cells (23), T cells, macrophages and dendritic cells (24). The OPN molecule is located in extracellular matrix and acts as a receptor for integrins and influences  various functions in endometrial epithelial cells (24). The level of OPN protein is higher in diabetic patients than in healthy people (25). Gong et al. also demonstrated that OPN levels are increased during the early stages of hyperglycemia (26). In the uterus and during implantation, OPN is expressed and increases dramatically in the secretion phase (27, 28). The expression of OPN at this stage reflects the role of this molecule in the implantation process, which has attracted the attention of researchers (28, 29). Expression of integrin is affected by diabetes (30). 
There are different blood glucose regulatory drugs and among them, two groups i.e. biguanide (Metformin) and thiazolidinedione (Pioglitazone) have been evaluated in this study. Metformin is the most frequently prescribed drug for diabetes treatment (31). Reduction of hepatic glucose production has been suggested as the primary function of this drug. Several mechanisms are involved in this procedure such as changes in enzymes activities or decrease in hepatic gluconeogenic substrates absorption (32).
Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione derivative, is an insulin-sensitizing agent regulator for the treatment of T2DM (33). Pioglitazone is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist which can reduce insulin resistance in liver, muscle and adipose tissue (34) and improve glucose and lipid metabolism (33).
Due to the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its effects on fertility, especially at the molecular level, the aim of our study was to examine the impression of diabetes on OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins values in endometrium at the time of embryo implantation in diabetic rat models treated with either metformin or pioglitazone.

Methods
This interventional study on diabetes mellitus was performed according to the certificate from Ethics Committee at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (IR.MUI.REC.1396.1. 189). The experiment was conducted on twenty-eight adult virgin female Wistar rats aged seven to eight weeks with weight of 175-225 gr purchased from Pasteur Institute of Iran. Animals were bred in normal conditions of 40-70% humidity, temperature of 21±4°C and on a 12 hr light/dark cycle.
Induction of diabetes: In order to induce experimental DM, rats were fasted overnight. In the next morning, nicotinamide (NA, Sigma-Aldrich, Ger-many) and streptozotocin (STZ, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were prepared in normal saline and intraperitoneally injected. First, nicotinamide (200–230 mg/kg) was injected, then after 15 min, it was followed by 60 mg/kg of streptozotocin injection. In order to measure fasting blood sugar, three days after intraperitoneal injection of NA and STZ, blood sampling was done by glucometer (HemoCue Glucose 201+, Sweden) and fasting blood sugar (FBS) was recorded in all rats. Rats with FBS in range of higher than 250 mg/dl were considered as diabetic models (35). 
Study design and sampling: Twenty-eight rats were randomly divided in four groups as follows: control group, STZ+NA induced diabetic model group without any treatment (FBS ≥250 mg/dl), diabetic group which received pioglitazone (20 mg/kg/day by orogastric gavage) and the last group was diabetic rats which received metformin (100 mg/kg/day by orogastric gavage). The rats were kept in diabetic condition for 4 weeks and then during the other next 4 weeks, metformin and pioglitazone treatment initiated. FBS was monitored every 4 days using a glucometer (HemoCue Glucose 201+, Sweden) and glucose reagent strips (ACCU-CHEK Active, Germany). In order to determine implantation time, female rats were mated with male rates. Mating of animals was conducted by placing each two female rats (16 weeks of age) with one male rat. In the next morning, observation of vaginal plugs or obtaining vaginal smears was the indication for the first gestational day. Ninety six hr (4 days) after observation of vaginal plugs or sperm in vaginal smears was the implantation time. Four weeks after treatment with metformin or pioglitazone, at the time of blastocyst implantation which was at the end of 8th week, rats in all groups were fasted overnight and then sacrificed by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine hydrochloride (50 mg/kg) and xylazine hydrochloride (7 mg/kg) (Diagram 1). Their uterine horns were dissected and endometrium was removed in a sterile condition. The endometrial samples were washed with Hanks’ balanced salt solution, then chopped in several fragments and kept in the sterile micro tubes.
Western blot analysis: Uterine slices, previously frozen at  80oC, were incubated and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer) (Cytomatingen, Iran). The protein concentration was quantified using Bradford assay. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS PAGE) using a 10% polyacrylamide gel was performed and the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were blotted with rabbit anti  OPN (cat. no. ab8448; Abcam) and rabbit anti α3β1 integrin (cat no. bs-1057R, bioss) primary antibodies at a dilution of 1:250 and incubated overnight at 4C. Following incubation, the membranes were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 and then incubated with mouse anti rabbit IgG – HRP secondary antibody (cat. nos. P1308 and P1309; Applygen Technologies) at a dilution of 1: 1,000 at room temperature for 90 min. The blots were visualized with Clarity western ECL substrate (cat. no. Bio Rad, 170-5060, USA). The densitometry of bands was performed using ImageJ software (Version 1.8, National Institutes of Health, USA) and β actin (cat. no. ab8226; Abcam) was used as the reference protein to validate the amount of protein loaded onto the gel.
Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). All experiments were performed at least three times and final results were expressed as means±standard error of mean (SEM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test was utilized to detect statistical significance which was considered as p<0.05.

Results
The protein level of OPN: According to figure 1, the protein level of OPN was increased significantly in diabetic group in comparison with control (p<0.001), metformin-treated (p=0.008) and pioglitazone-treated (p<0.001) groups. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between control group compared with metformin-treated (p<0.001) and pioglitazone-treated (p=0.023) groups. The level of OPN protein in pioglitazone-treated group was significantly lower than metformin-treated group (p=0.014). 
The protein level of α3β1: As figure 2 reveals, the mean of α3β1 integrin protein level in the diabetic group showed a significant difference in comparison with control (p<0.001), metformin-treated (p=0.026) and pioglitazone-treated (p<0.001) groups. There was also a significant difference between control group compared with metformin-treated (p<0.001) and pioglitazone-treated (p=0.033) groups. The level of α3β1 integrin protein was significantly lower in pioglitazone-treated than metformin-treated group (p=0.033).

Discussion
In 2013, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported that nearly 382 million people were suffering from diabetes mellitus worldwide, and according to their prediction, it may reach 600 million in 2030 (36). About 90% of cases with T2DM are diagnosed in the ages less than 30 years old. With onset of diabetes at a younger age, it ought to be considered that its beginning is in the middle range of  woman’s reproductive years (37, 38). Therefore, the complications and side effects of DM could be observed in women at their golden time of fertility. As previously reported, fertility rate is lower in women with DM than in healthy women, and DM could be assumed as one of the subfertility causes (39, 40).
DM could alter the value of OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins (26, 30, 41, 42). In the early stage of diabetic nephropathy in human, α3β1 integrin gene expression significantly increases in kidney (Podocytes) (43). Setty et al. reported the increased expression of α3 protein in meningeal cells cultured in high-glucose media (44, 45). The protein level of OPN, in the vitreous body of patients with diabetic retinopathy, is up-regulated compared to non-diabetic individuals (46, 47). In rat models of diabetic nephropathy, OPN expression is obviously elevated in the aorta and renal cortex (48, 49). Therefore, according to literature review, increased OPN levels could be considered as one of the primary factors of the complicated malfunctions in affected organs. 
At the secretory phase of endometrium, α3β1 protein expression is up-regulated and this alteration could be due to the hormonal cycle (50). DM affects the integrins synthesis and integrins functions against extracellular matrix. So, it could be assumed as the cause of abnormal and firmer attachment in the affected epithelium (51).
Qi et al. demonstrated that OPN mRNA and OPN protein are up-regulated on day 4th of pregnancy, suggesting that OPN may play a role in the blastocyst implantation (52). OPN protein level was reported to be raised in the endometrial epithelium in the mid-secretory phase of menstrual cycle (12, 53).
In the present study, DM affected the expression of OPN and integrin α3β1 proteins and up-regulated their expression levels in the endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. With consideration of these facts about OPN and α3β1 integrin and their specified roles in implantation, the increased value of these proteins in DM may lead to more tight junctions between endometrial epithelial cells at the time of embryo implantation. These disturbances in the amounts of these proteins could lead to unsuccessful endometrial receptivity.
No similar study was found for measuring the effects of diabetes on OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins in the endometrium. But in our previous study, diabetes was found to increase the gene expression of OPN in the endometrium, which was in line with the results of the present study (12).
In our present study, the effects of two common hypoglycemic drugs i.e. metformin and pioglitazone, were also evaluated in order to compare these two drugs’ impressions on OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins expression. The results demonstrated that both drugs could significantly reduce the levels of OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins compared with diabetic group. Notably, pioglitazone was more effective than metformin and reduced the OPN and α3β1 integrin protein levels more than metformin.
Pioglitazone improves glucose plasma levels in patients with T2DM by increasing insulin sensitivity in different cells (54). In the present study, pioglitazone showed a more prominent effect on controlling the protein levels of OPN and integrin α3β1. Better efficacy of pioglitazone than metformin may be due to the interaction of pioglitazone with the nuclear receptor called peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) (One of regulators of genes expression) which affects DNA transcription in endometrial tissue at the time of embryo implantation (12). 

Conclusion
Diabetes mellitus significantly increased the protein levels of OPN and α3β1 integrin in the rat endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. And it seems untreated diabetes could be potentially assumed as one of the elements in embryo implantation failure in assisted and natural reproduction. Treatment with pioglitazone and metformin improved the level of OPN and α3β1 integrin proteins while interestingly pioglitazone was more effective.

Acknowledgement
We would like to express our appreciation to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences for their financial support in projects number 194184 and 196189. 

Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.




Figures, Charts, Tables


Diagram 1. The study was designed from the induction of diabetes till tissue sampling. This study lasted 8 weeks, 4 weeks in diabetic condition without treatment and the other 4 weeks, treatments with pioglitazone and metformin were applied

Diagram 1. The study was designed from the induction of diabetes till tissue sampling. This study lasted 8 weeks, 4 weeks in diabetic condition without treatment and the other 4 weeks, treatments with pioglitazone and metformin were applied




Figure 1.&nbsp; Comparison of OPN protein levels in the rat endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. All values were presented as mean&plusmn;SEM. Error bars represent standard error of mean.&nbsp; p&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis reveals that significant differences were observed be-tween all four groups. In western blot image, D=diabetic control, C=control group, D+P=diabetic rats treated with pioglitazone and D+M=diabetic rats treated with metformin

Figure 1.  Comparison of OPN protein levels in the rat endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. All values were presented as mean±SEM. Error bars represent standard error of mean.  p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis reveals that significant differences were observed be-tween all four groups. In western blot image, D=diabetic control, C=control group, D+P=diabetic rats treated with pioglitazone and D+M=diabetic rats treated with metformin




Figure 2. Comparison of &alpha;3&beta;1 integrin protein levels in rat endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. All values were presented as mean&plusmn;SEM. Error bars represent standard error of mean. p&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis reveals that significant differences were observed between all four groups. In western blot image, D=diabetic control, C=control group, D+P=diabetic rats treated with pioglitazone and D+M=diabetic rats treated with metformin

Figure 2. Comparison of α3β1 integrin protein levels in rat endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. All values were presented as mean±SEM. Error bars represent standard error of mean. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis reveals that significant differences were observed between all four groups. In western blot image, D=diabetic control, C=control group, D+P=diabetic rats treated with pioglitazone and D+M=diabetic rats treated with metformin



References
  1. Mays L. Diabetes mellitus standards of care. Nurs Clin. 2015;50(4):703-11.   [PubMed]
  2. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Shetty AS, Nanditha A. Trends in prevalence of diabetes in Asian countries. World J Diabets. 2012;3(6):110-7.   [PubMed]
  3. Fal AM, Jankowska B, Uchmanowicz I, Sen M, Panaszek B, Polanski J. Type 2 diabetes quality of life patients treated with insulin and oral hypoglycemic medication. Acta Diabetol. 2011;48 (3):237-42.   [PubMed]
  4. Amaral S, Oliveira PJ, Ramalho-Santos J. Diabetes and the impairment of reproductive function: possible role of mitochondria and reactive oxygen species. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008;4(1):46-54.   [PubMed]
  5. Kumar D. Prevalence of female infertility and its socio-economic factors in tribal communities of central India. Rural Remote Health. 2007;7(2):456.   [PubMed]
  6. Practice committee of the American society for reproductive medicine. Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5 Suppl 1):S111-4.   [PubMed]
  7. Elnaggar A, Farag AH, Gaber ME, Hafeez MA, Ali MS, Atef AM. AlphaVBeta3 integrin expression within uterine endometrium in unexplained infertility: a prospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):90.   [PubMed]
  8. Miller E, Hare JW, Cloherty JP, Dunn PJ, Gleason RE, Soeldner JS, et al. Elevated maternal hemoglobin A1c in early pregnancy and major congenital anomalies in infants of diabetic mothers. New Engl J Med. 1981;304(22):1331-4.   [PubMed]
  9. Anderson JL, Waller DK, Canfield MA, Shaw GM, Watkins ML, Werler MM. Maternal obesity, gestational diabetes, and central nervous system birth defects. Epidemiology. 2005;16(1):87-92.   [PubMed]
  10. Peyghambari F, Amanpour S, Fayazi M, Haddadi M, Muhammadnejad S, Muhammadnejad A, et al. Expression of α4, αv, β1 and β3 integrins during the implantation window on blastocyst of a mouse model of polycystic ovarian syndromes. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(9):623-32.
  11. Aplin JD, Ruane PT. Embryo-epithelium intera-ctions during implantation at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(1):15-22.
  12. Hosseiny ZS, Nikpour P, Bakhteyari A, Mostafavi FS, Matinfar M, Jahani M, et al. Evaluation of osteopontin gene expression in endometrium of diabetic rat models treated with metformin and pioglitazone. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019;12(4):293-7.   [PubMed]
  13. Fukuda MN, Sugihara K. Cell adhesion molecules in human embryo implantation. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2012;64(3):247-58.   [PubMed]
  14. Lessey BA. Endometrial receptivity and the window of implantation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(5):775-88.
  15. Ballas J, Moore TR, Ramos GA. Management of diabetes in pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12(1):33-42.   [PubMed]
  16. Jensen DM, Korsholm L, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, Moelsted-Pedersen L, Westergaard JG, et al. Peri-conceptional A1C and risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcome in 933 women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):1046-8.   [PubMed]
  17. Geisert R, Fazleabas A, Lucy M, Mathew D. Interaction of the conceptus and endometrium to establish pregnancy in mammals: role of interleukin 1β. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349(3):825-38.   [PubMed]
  18. Lessey B. Endometrial integrins and the establishment of uterine receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1998;13 Suppl 3:247-58.   [PubMed]
  19. Chung TW, Park MJ, Kim HS, Choi HJ, Ha KT. Integrin αVβ3 and αVβ5 are required for leukemia inhibitory factor-mediated the adhesion of trophoblast cells to the endometrial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;469(4):936-40.   [PubMed]
  20. Singh H, Aplin JD. Adhesion molecules in endometrial epithelium: tissue integrity and embryo implantation. J Anat. 2009;215(1):3-13.   [PubMed]
  21. Tabibzadeh S. Patterns of expression of integrin molecules in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(6):876-82.   [PubMed]
  22. Chen Q, Shou P, Zhang L, Xu C, Zheng C, Han Y, et al. An osteopontin‐integrin interaction plays a critical role in directing adipogenesis and osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32(2):327-37.   [PubMed]
  23. Wesson JA, Johnson RJ, Mazzali M, Beshensky AM, Stietz S, Giachelli C, et al. Osteopontin is a critical inhibitor of calcium oxalate crystal formation and retention in renal tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(1):139-47.   [PubMed]
  24. Lund SA, Giachelli CM, Scatena M. The role of osteopontin in inflammatory processes. J Cell Commun Signal. 2009;3(3-4):311-22.   [PubMed]
  25. Asaumi S, Takemoto M, Yokote K, Ridall AL, Butler WT, Fujimoto M, et al. Identification and characterization of high glucose and glucosamine responsive element in the rat osteopontin promoter. J Diabets Complications. 2003;17(1):34-8.   [PubMed]
  26. Gong Q, Chipitsyna G, Gray CF, Anandanadesan R, Arafat HA. Expression and regulation of osteopontin in type 1 diabetes. Islets. 2009;1(1):34-41.   [PubMed]
  27. Apparao K, Illera MJ, Beyler SA, Olson GE, Osteen KG, Corjay MH, et al. Regulated expression of osteopontin in the peri-implantation rabbit uterus. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(5):1484-90.   [PubMed]
  28. von Wolff M, Strowitzki T, Becker V, Zepf C, Tabibzadeh S, Thaler CJ. Endometrial osteopontin, a ligand of β3-integrin, is maximally expressed around the time of the “implantation window”. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(4):775-81.   [PubMed]
  29. Apparao KB, Murray MJ, Fritz MA, Meyer WR, Chambers AF, Truong PR, et al. Osteopontin and its receptor αvβ3 integrin are coexpressed in the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle but regulated differentially. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(10):4991-5000.   [PubMed]
  30. Kostidou E, Koliakos G, Kaloyianni M. Increased monocyte alphaL, alphaM and beta2 integrin subunits in diabetes mellitus. Clin Biochem. 2009;42(7-8):634-40.   [PubMed]
  31. He L, Wondisford FE. Metformin action: concentrations matter. Cell Metab. 2015;21(2):159-62.   [PubMed]
  32. Viollet B, Guigas B, Sanz Garcia N, Leclerc J, Foretz M, Andreelli F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: an overview. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012;122(6):253-70.   [PubMed]
  33. Zou C, Hu H. Use of pioglitazone in the treatment of diabetes: effect on cardiovascular risk. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:429-33.   [PubMed]
  34. Gross B, Staels B. PPAR agonists: multimodal drugs for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;21(4):687-710.   [PubMed]
  35. Zabihi S, Wentzel P, Eriksson UJ. Altered uterine perfusion is involved in fetal outcome of diabetic rats. Placenta. 2008;29(5):413-21.   [PubMed]
  36. Kokil GR, Veedu RN, Ramm GA, Prins JB, Parekh HS. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: limitations of conventional therapies and intervention with nucleic acid-based therapeutics. Chem Rev. 2015;115(11):4719-43.   [PubMed]
  37. Basmatzou T, Konstantinos Hatziveis M. Diabetes mellitus and influences on human fertility. Int J Caring Sci. 2016;9(1):371-9.
  38. Agbaje IM, Rogers DA, McVicar CM, McClure N, Atkinson AB, Mallidis C, et al. Insulin dependant diabetes mellitus: implications for male reproductive function. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(7):1871-7.   [PubMed]
  39. Platt MJ, Stanisstreet M, Casson IF, Howard CV, Walkinshaw S, Pennycook S, et al. St Vincent’s declaration 10 years on: outcomes of diabetic pregnancies. Diabet Med. 2002;19(3):216-20.   [PubMed]
  40. Seaward AV, Burke SD, Croy BA. Interferon gamma contributes to preimplantation embryonic development and to implantation site structure in NOD mice. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(11):2829-39.   [PubMed]
  41. Tsilibary P-E, Charonis AS, Setty S, Mauer M. Analysis of alpha integrins for the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. Google Patents; 2004.
  42. Shanmugam N, Reddy MA, Guha M, Natarajan R. High glucose-induced expression of proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine genes in monocytic cells. Diabetes. 2003;52(5):1256-64.   [PubMed]
  43. Sawada K, Toyoda M, Kaneyama N, Shiraiwa S, Moriya H, Miyatake H, et al. Upregulation of α3β1-integrin in podocytes in early-stage diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:9265074.   [PubMed]
  44. Jin DK, Fish AJ, Wayner EA, Mauer M, Setty S, Tsilibary E, et al. Distribution of integrin subunits in human diabetic kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7(12):2636-45.   [PubMed]
  45. Setty S, Wayner E, Kim Y, Tsilibary E. Changes in the profile of integrins from human mesangial cells following exposure to high glucose. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4:665.
  46. Zhang X, Chee WK, Liu S, Tavintharan S, Sum CF, Lim SC, et al. Association of plasma osteopontin with diabetic retinopathy in Asians with type 2 diabetes. Mol Vis. 2018;24:165-73.   [PubMed]
  47. Abu El-Asrar AM, Nawaz MI, De Hertogh G, Alam K, Siddiquei MM, Van den Eynde K, et al. S100A4 is upregulated in proliferative diabetic retinopathy and correlates with markers of angiogenesis and fibrogenesis. Mol Vis. 2014;20:1209-24.   [PubMed]
  48. Fischer JW, Tschöpe C, Reinecke A, Giachelli CM, Unger T. Upregulation of osteopontin expression in renal cortex of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats is mediated by bradykinin. Diabetes. 1998;47(9):1512-8.   [PubMed]
  49. Towler DA, Bidder M, Latifi T, Coleman T, Semenkovich CF. Diet-induced diabetes activates an osteogenic gene regulatory program in the aortas of low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(46):30427-34.   [PubMed]
  50. Giannelli G, Sgarra C, Di Naro E, Lavopa C, Angelotti U, Tartagni M, et al. Endometriosis is characterized by an impaired localization of laminin‐5 and α3β1 integrin receptor. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17(1):242-7.   [PubMed]
  51. Roth T, Podesta F, Stepp MA, Boeri D, Lorenzi M. Integrin overexpression induced by high glucose and by human diabetes: potential pathway to cell dysfunction in diabetic microangiopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(20):9640-4.   [PubMed]
  52. Qi QR, Xie QZ, Liu XL, Zhou Y. Osteopontin is expressed in the mouse uterus during early pregnancy and promotes mouse blastocyst attachment and invasion in vitro. Plos One. 2014;9(8):e104955.   [PubMed]
  53. Franchi A, Zaret J, Zhang X, Bocca S, Oehninger S. Expression of immunomodulatory genes, their protein products and specific ligands/receptors during the window of implantation in the human endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(7):413-21.   [PubMed]
  54. Gales C, Zamfir C, Stoica B, Nechifor M. Zinc and pioglitazone effects on ovaries and endometrium in diabetes. Farmacia. 2015;63(1):52-6.



Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and copyrighted by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2016 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.