blogger delicious digg diigo facebook googleplus linkedin netlog reddit twitter
Skip Navigation LinksJRI > Archive > April-June 2017, Volume 18, Issue 2 > Poor Quality Embryos Hamper the Development of High Quality Ones



Volume 18, Issue 2, Number 71 / April-June
(Editorial, pages 211-212)


Poor Quality Embryos Hamper the Development of High Quality Ones




 Corresponding Author
Monoclonal Antibody Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute (ACECR), Tehran, Iran


Related Articles
in Google Scholar in PubMed

 

Other Format
pdfPDF Full Text (En) pdfPDF Full Text (Fa) pdfePUB Full Text (En) pdfPDF Abstract (En) pdfPDF Abstract (Fa) pdf BibTeX pdfRefMan pdfEndNote xmlPMC XML online readerPMC Reader

 



To cite this article:


Full Text

Embryo quality and embryo selection are critical criteria for embryo transfer and subsequently success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Transfer of good quality embryos is associated with increased implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates and also decreased pregnancy loss and prenatal complications in comparison with transfer of embryos with impaired quality. Furthermore, advance in embryo culture techniques and embryo selection criteria and technologies lead to a decrease in number of transferred embryos without significant decline in ART success. Therefore, elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is recently the dominant discourse in the community and infertility clinics. An important concern of eSET is reduced multiple pregnancy and its prenatal complications as a major complication of ART. Since more than one embryo is produced in IVF cycle, surplus embryos with appropriate quality are frozen for future transfer in frozen/thawed cycles. There are treatment cycles in which the number and quality of embryos are not sufficient for freezing/thawing. The question always arises in these cycles is that "Does simultaneous transfer of low and top quality embryos have determining impact on treatment success or not?". It was previously believed and recent finding reported that the low quality embryos have no impact on implantation and development of top quality embryos; even, many low quality embryos have the potential for implantation and successful pregnancy. As a result, twin pregnancy is 9.5% in cycles with transfer of one top quality and one low quality embryo; however, it is zero in eSET and 10.6% in cycles with two top quality embryos (1).
Although other studies provide different conclusions, the transfer of low quality embryos can impair implantation and development of top quality embryos. So, it is recommended to transfer top quality embryos alone despite the minimum number of fresh/frozen embryos in transfer cycles (2). If this is true, the question arises that how poor-quality embryos influence development and implantation of the embryos with good quality. Review of in vitro studies on prolonged culture of embryos confirms the in vivo findings. Group culture of day 3 good and low quality embryos influences the rate of high quality blastocyst formation in comparison with separate culture of low and high quality embryos. It has been postulated that different toxic compounds such as ammonia and reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by low quality embryos have deleterious effects on quantity and quality of developed blastocysts (3). In addition, endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) and stromal cells (ESCs) of uterine tissues are very responsive to human embryos following in vitro culture. Top quality embryos enhance diffrentiation, decidualization, secretion of chemokine and growth factors that promote encapsulation and implatation of blastocyst. Therefore, good quality embryos actively intract with endometrium and promote their immplantation. In contrast, poor quality embryos inhibit selective migratory response of decidualizing ESCs and subsequent active encapsulation of themselves (4). Thus, in vitro culture of embryo and the co-culture with ESCs verified the recent report of El-danasouri et al. on negative effects of poor quality embryos on implantation of good quality ones in tranfer cycles. Of course, it also should not be ignored that embryo assess-ments are now based on morphometric criteria which are not accurate and precise parameters. Hence, in some cases, this assessment is not consistent with functional markers of embryos. The support for this claim are the many reports on successful pregnancy following transfer of poor quality embryos or simultaneous transfer of one top and one poor quality embryo in one cycle and the incidence of having twins is 9.5% among cases (1).
In spite of the supporting evidence for influence of embryo quality on the implantation, it should be noted that all of these studies have been retrospective. The final confirmation of these findings requires numerous prospective studies with more stringent design on larger samples. Regarding partial verification of this issue, IVF centers should avoid simultaneous transfer of good and poor quality embryos in fresh and frozen/thawed cycles as much as possible. It is recommended that poor quality embryos be cultured separately and subsequently transferred or frozen if they could develop to high quality blastocysts.



References
  1. Wintner EM, Hershko-Klement A, Tzadikevitch K, Ghetler Y, Gonen O, Wintner O, et al. Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome? J Ovarian Res. 2017;10(1):2.   [PubMed]
  2. El-Danasouri I, Sterzik K, Rinaldi L, Pacchiarotti A, DeSanto M, Selman H. Effect of transferring a morphologically im-paired embryo with a good quality embryo on the pregnancy and implantation rates. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(3):394-8.   [PubMed]
  3. Tao T, Robichaud A, Mercier J, Ouellette R. Influence of group embryo culture strategies on the blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(1):63-8.   [PubMed]
  4. Weimar CH, Macklon NS, Post Uiterweer ED, Brosens JJ, Gellersen B. The motile and invasive capacity of human endo-metrial stromal cells: implications for normal and impaired reproductive function. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):542-57.   [PubMed]



Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and copyrighted by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2016 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.