Journal Information
Journal ID (publisher-id): JRI
ISSN: 2228-5482
ISSN: 2251-676X
Publisher: Avicenna Research Institute
Article Information
Copyright © 2011 Avicenna Research Institute
open-access: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
ReceivedDay: 08Month: 01Year: 2011
AcceptedDay: 13Month: 03Year: 2011
Print publication date: Season: Jul-SepYear: 2011
Volume: 12Issue: 3
First Page: 227Last Page: 234
Publisher Id: JRI-12-227

Risk Factors for Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Report from the Maroua Regional Hospital, Cameroon
Pierre MarieTebeu123*
PascalFoumane1
RobinsonMbu1
GisèleFosso2
Paul TjekBiyaga3
Joseph NelsonFomulu3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals, Yaoundé, Cameroon
2Ligue d'Initiative et de Recherche Active pour la Santé et l'Education de la Femme (LIRASEF), Yaoundé, Cameroon
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional Hospital, Maroua, Cameroon
*Corresponding Author: Pierre Marie Tebeu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon. E-mail:pmtebeu@yahoo.fr

Abstract
Introduction

A recent study at the Maroua Provincial Hospital revealed that hypertension in pregnancy was the first cause of maternal death, representing 17.5% of the 63 maternal deaths recorded between 2003 and 2005. Knowing little about the causes, this study was to identify the possible risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Methods

This case-control study was-done at the Maroua Regional Hospital, Cameroon between June 2005 and May 2007. All the 152 deliveries complicated with hypertension were compared and analyzed with 414 pregnancies that were not complicated with the disease. Data analysis was performed using EPI Info 3.5.1. The differences were considered to be significant if the p-values were less than 0.05.

Results

Using univariate analysis, several factors linked to hypertensive disorder in pregnancy were identified. They included early adolescence, nulliparity, illiteracy, lack of occupation and family history of hypertension. At multivariate analysis, the risk of having hypertension during pregnancy remained greater for illiterate women (OR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.0-2.3), housewives (OR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.1-6.9), nulliparae (OR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.5-3.6), women with family histories of hypertension (OR: 3.6; 95%CI: 1.6-8.5) and women with histories of hypertension during pregnancy (OR: 7.0; 95%CI: 3.0-16.4).

Conclusion

Risk factors for hypertensive diseases in pregnancy in Maroua, Cameroon seem to include early teenage status, illiteracy, housewife status, nulliparity and family or personal histories of hypertension. The knowledge about the aforesaid factors seems to lay the tracks for its prevention in Cameroon.


Introduction

Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy is a condition in which the pregnant woman presents an elevated blood pressure during pregnancy or puerperium as defined in 1986 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) (14). Previous reports defined hypertension in pregnancy as a condition presented with a diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg or a systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg, or a rise in diastolic blood pressure of at least 15 mmHg or a rise of 30 mmHg in systolic blood pressure (2, 3). In the obstetric condition, the Working Group recently defined hypertension in pregnancy as a condition in which, the diastolic blood pressure is at 90 mmHg or above, or a systolic blood pressure is at 140 mmHg or above (5). Moreover, WHO considers only an elevated value of diastolic blood pressure as a criterion for defining the disorder (3). The disorder complicates 4-10% of pregnancies (610). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the United Nations Organization recognize four categories of hypertension in pregnancy. These include chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and super-imposed preeclampsia/eclampsia, a condition defined as chronic hypertension complicated by pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (24).

Several studies have analyzed the risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and the identified risk factors include obesity, a family history of hypertension, alcohol intake, heart failure, stroke and left ventricular hypertrophy and smoking (1113).

A recent study at the Maroua Provincial Hospital revealed that hypertension in pregnancy was the first cause of maternal death, representing 17.5% of the 63 maternal deaths recorded between 2003 and 2005; however, little is known about the risk factors for hypertension in pregnancy in Cameroon, especially in the Far North Region (14).

The aim of this study was to identify the possible risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, in order to propose specific preventive measures for the Far North Cameroon.


Methods

This case-control study evaluates hypertension in pregnancy in Far North Cameroon.

Design and site of the study

This case-control study was undertaken at the Maroua Regional Hospital, Cameroon. This hospital is a second level referral facility for the Far North Region. However, its obstetric care unit has insufficient personnel despite its high workload. During the years 2005-2007, there was one gynecologist, one midwife and six trained nurses assisted by four temporary assistant nurses. About four deliveries were carried out per day. Between 2003 and 2004, there were 3263 deliveries of which 144 (4.41%) were by cesarean section.

Population

In the present study, we considered, women with a diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg or a systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg to have hypertensive disorder in pregnancy. During the study period (June 2005 to May 2007), we identified 176 cases of hypertension in pregnancy. We excluded 16 (9.1%) cases of twin gestations from our analysis. Among the remaining 160 cases, we excluded 8 women who had chronic hypertension, 152 cases were eventually analysed. For each case of hypertension in pregnancy, about 3 women who followed her in delivery and had no hypertension were retained as the controls. Overall, 414 women were recruited as the controls against 152 cases of the study.

Variables of interest

Data were collected on the socio-economic status (age, marital status, educational level, occupation, residence) of the participants.

Data management

The data were collected, tested and corrected for the study. Information from the files was read into MS Excel sheets, and stored in the database of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Maroua Provincial Hospital.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using EPI Info 3.5.1. The conventional rule of thumb was applied and therefore, the chi2 of heterogeneity was used in comparing the distribution of different obstetrical hypertension risks factors in the two study populations when appropriate. However, if an expected number was less than 5, we used an alternative, Fisher's exact test. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was used to appreciate the impact of different variables on the risk of presenting hypertension.

The analysis included means, range, standard deviation and proportions. The univariate analysis was conducted to identify the association of different variables on the risk of presenting hypertension in pregnancy. The multivariate analysis was used taking into account the potential confounding factors. The difference was considered significant if the p-value was less than 0.05.


Results

For a period of two years at the Maroua Regional Hospital, (June 2005 to May 2007), there were 3228 deliveries among which 176 were complicated by hypertension (5.45%). Among the overall 3228 deliveries, 60 had hypertension complicated by seizures (1.86%) but 116 did not (3.59%). Eleven women (6.25%) had elevated blood pressure before the 20th week of gestation.

When compared with women without hypertension, the pregnant patients with hypertension presented no difference regarding marital status (94.7% vs. 95.2%), history of abortion (22.4% vs. 23.9%) or history of premature delivery (1.8% vs. 1.7%). Meanwhile, women with hypertensive disorder in pregnancy were at early teenage years (16.4% vs. 6.8%) and in nulliparous status (71.1% vs. 57%) compared to control women. The illiteracy rate was also higher among the women with hypertension disorder (48.7% vs. 35.7%) (Table 1).

The number of patients with hypertensive disease in pregnancy was significantly greater in pregnancy when taking into account a personal history of hypertension in pregnancy (14.5% vs.2.2%), a personal history of chronic hypertension (5.3% vs.1.0%), a history of paternal hypertension (17.8% vs. 6.5%), or a history of hypertension for siblings (8.6% vs. 2.9%) (Table 2). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups concerning the history of maternal hypertension.

Univariate analysis revealed (Table 3) a greater risk of having hypertension during pregnancy for the age group 13-16 years (OR: 2.6; 95%CI: 1.5-4.7; p= 0.0005), women without any school education (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1-2.4; p= 0.0052), housewives (OR: 2,8; 95%CI: 1.05-4.2; p= 0.0313), women with no previous deliveries (OR: 1.8; 95%CI: 1.2-2.7; p= 0.0024), women with histories of paternal hypertension (OR: 3.0; 95%CI: 1.7-5.4; p< 0.0001), women with histories of sibling hypertension (OR: 3.1; 95%CI: 1.3-7.0; p= 0.0037), women with histories of hypertension in pregnancy (OR: 7.6; 95%CI: 3.4-16.9; p< 0.0001), and women with histories of chronic hypertension (OR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.6-19.1; p= 0.0016).

At multivariate analysis and after adjustment for different factors linked to the occurrence of hypertension, the risk of having hypertension during pregnancy remained greater for women without any school education (OR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.0-2.3; p= 0.0117); housewives (OR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.1-6.9; p= 0.0167); women with no previous deliveries (OR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.5-3.6; p= 0.0001); women with histories of sibling hypertension (OR: 3.6; 95%CI: 1.6-8.5; p= 0.0014) and women with histories of hypertension in pregnancy (OR: 7.0; 95%CI: 3.0-16.4; p< 0.0001).


Discussion

We conducted this study in order to identify the possible risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in Maroua, Cameroon. We found that, the risk factors for hypertensive diseases in pregnancy in Maroua, Cameroon included early teenage status, illiteracy, housewife status, nulliparity, and family and the personal histories of hypertension.

The extreme ages of reproductive years are well-known risk factors for hypertension during pregnancy with high incidence rates in teenagers (15, 16).

Many authors have identified young age as a risk factor for hypertension during pregnancy, as is the case in the present study (17, 18). Adeyinka et al. found the prevalence of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia among adolescents to be 20% in comparison to only 3.33% among the controls (17). In another study, a 2.9% vs. 0.6% preeclampsia prevalence was reported in teenagers compared to women aged 25-34 years (18). In the present study, the number of early teenagers among patients with hypertension was 16.4% compared to 6.8% among the controls. We found that early teenage status (13-16 years) was associated with an increased risk for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (OR: 2.6; 95%CI: 1.5-4.7; p= 0.0005). Similar findings were reported by Saftlas et al. (16) who revealed that black teenagers aged 15-17 years had 2.6-fold risk for preeclampsia compared to women aged 24-34 years.

Studies have reported that a higher age is also an important risk factor for hypertension in pregnancy, especially in developed countries (19, 20). Assis et al. (20) found that age above 30 years was associated with a risk for preeclampsia super-imposed on chronic hypertension (OR: 5.218; 95% CI: 1.873 to 14.536) (20). A similar result was reported by Suzuki et al. (19) who found that, in singleton pregnancies, the developing pre-eclampsia was associated with maternal age 35 years or above. Both studies reported the association of infertility treatment with an increased risk for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy as this was also recently reported by Poon et al. (21), but Maroua, Cameroon is a semi-urban area and few women are likely to be under ovulation treatment.

In the present study, the percentage of women aged 35 to 44 years old was similar in the two study populations revealing that, this age group was not associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Some studies are necessary to understand better why there is lack of effect of the age progress on the occurrence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

The absence of previous deliveries is widely reported as a risk factor for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (19, 22, 23). Assis et al. (20) identified primiparity as a risk factor for gestational hypertension (OR: 5.435; 95% CI: 1.9-15.4). In the present study, we found that nulliparity was associated with a nearly 2-fold risk for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1. 2-2.7). Our findings are in conformity with the aforementioned literature reports.

In the present study, women with at least two previous deliveries represented 15.1% vs. 13% when respectively comparing hypertensive to non- hypertensive women. Previous studies did find multiparity as a risk factor for hypertension in pregnancy, however, they reported an increased risk the nulliparous women had a different partner (24, 25).

We found that illiteracy was associated with about 2-fold risk for presenting hypertensive disorder in pregnancy (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.4). The absence of school education, identified as an independent risk factor for hypertensive disorder in pregnancies, is well-documented in the literature (26, 27). Among the risk factors for pre-eclampsia Mittendorf et al. (28) identified less than a high school education (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1-3.6). The illiteracy rate in our population could influence the occurrence of hypertension in pregnancy by the simple reason that the low school level is associated indirectly to the precocious marriage and to limited access to health care, including family planning.

Even though some authors have not found any difference in pregnancy outcomes between housewives and employed women (29), most publications state that workers have adverse outcomes (3032). In the present study, housewives had an increased risk for hypertensive disorder in pregnancy (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.05-4.2). However, housewives, respectively, represent 93.4% and 87% in hypertensive and non-hypertensive study populations and could randomly influence the pregnancy risks.

Hypertension during pregnancy is also known to be an important risk factor for developing hypertension in pregnancy (23). Previous pre-eclampsia as an independent risk for super-imposed preeclampsia was reported to be associated with about 5-fold increase for the risk (OR: 4.757; 95% CI: 1.261-17.938). A higher risk of hypertensive disorder in pregnancy was reported among women with previous hypertension in pregnancy (OR: 7.6; 95% CI: 3.4-16.9) (20).

Personal history of chronic hypertension is one of the reported risk factors for hypertensive diseases in pregnancy (21, 33). Family history of hypertension was identified as a risk factor for hypertension in Cameroon (11). However, little is known separately about histories of paternal, sibling or maternal hypertension, although we were able to illustrate that the last one is not a risk factor for hypertensive disease in pregnancy.

Some studies have reported body mass index and birth spacing as risk factors for hypertension in pregnancy, but those variables were not analyzed in the present study (34, 35).


Conclusion

Risk factors for hypertensive diseases in pregnancy in Maroua, Cameroon included early teenage status, illiteracy, housewife status, nulliparity, and family and personal histories of hypertension. Knowledge of risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy may give tracks for prevention in the population of Maroua, Cameroon and beyond. Some more extended prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings. The confirmation of these findings should help towards the development of the national strategies of hypertension in pregnancy prevention. Prevention must include campaigns and education from the medical and paramedical staff.


Acknowledgement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.


References
1. ACOG. ACOG technical bulletin. Hypertension in pregnancy. Number 219--January 1996 (replaces no. 91, February 1986). Committee on Technical Bulletins of the American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsInt J Gynaecol Obstet1996;53(2):175–83.
2. CunninghamFG, LevenoKJ, BloomSL, HauthJC, GilstrapLCIII, WenstromKD. , . Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. 22nd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2005. Williams Obstetrics; p. 426.-50.Chapter 34
3. McCaw BinnsAM, MacGillivrayI, HawkinsN, GoldingJ, AshleyDEC. International variation in the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy among primiparae: the Jamaican experienceWest Indian Med J.1997;46Suppl 2:29.
4. SchroederBM. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin on diagnosing and managing preeclampsia and eclampsia. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsAm Fam Physician.2002;66(2):330–1.
5. Working Group on High Blood Pressure. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in PregnancyAm J Obstet Gynecol2000;183(1):S1–S22.
6. RobertsCL, AlgertCS, MorrisJM, FordJB, Henderson-SmartDJ. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a population-based studyMed J Aust.2005;182(7):332–5.
7. GoldingJ. A randomised trial of low dose aspirin for primiparae in pregnancy. The Jamaica Low Dose Aspirin Study GroupBr J Obstet Gynaecol.1998;105(3):293–9.
8. LevineRJ, HauthJC, CuretLB, SibaiBM, CatalanoPM, MorrisCD, et al.Trial of calcium to prevent preeclampsiaN Engl J Med.1997;337(2):69–76.
9. Conde-AgudeloA, BelizánJM. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in a large cohort of Latin American and Caribbean womenBJOG.2000;107(1):75–83.
10. TrogstadLI, EskildA, MagnusP, SamuelsenSO, NesheimBI. Changing paternity and time since last pregnancy; the impact on pre-eclampsia risk. A study of 547 238 women with and without previous pre-eclampsiaInt J Epidemiol.2001;30(6):1317–22.
11. Shey WiysongeCU, Ngu BlackettK, MbuagbawJN. Risk factors and complications of hypertension in Yaounde, CameroonCardiovasc J S Afr.2004;15(5):215–9.
12. PridjianG, PuschettJB. Preeclampsia. Part 1: clinical and pathophysiologic considerationsObstet Gynecol Surv.2002;57(9):598–618.
13. LeenersB, RathW, KuseS, IrawanC, ImthurnB, Neumaier-WagnerP. BMI: new aspects of a classical risk factor for hypertensive disorders in pregnancyClin Sci (Lond)2006;111(1):81–6.
14. TebeuPM, NgassaP, KouamL, MajorAL, FomuluJN. Maternal mortality in Maroua Provincial Hospital, Cameroon (2003-2005)West Indian Med J.2007;56(6):502–7.
15. ChesleyLC. History and epidemiology of pre-eclampsia-eclampsiaClin Obstet Gynecol.1984;27(4):801–20.
16. SaftlasAF, OlsonDR, FranksAL, AtrashHK, PokrasR. Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979-1986Am J Obstet Gynecol.1990;163(2):460–5.
17. AdeyinkaDA, OladimejiO, AdekanbiTI, Adeyin-kaFE, FalopeY, AimakhuC. Outcome of adolescent pregnancies in southwestern Nigeria: a case-control studyJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.2010;23(8):785–9.
18. UstaIM, ZoorobD, Abu-MusaA, NaassanG, NassarAH. Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies compared with adult pregnanciesActa Obstet Gynecol Scand.2008;87(2):178–83.
19. SuzukiS, IgarashiM. Risk factors for preeclampsia in Japanese twin pregnancies: comparison with those in singleton pregnanciesArch Gynecol Obstet.2009;280(3):389–93.
20. AssisTR, VianaFP, RassiS. Study on the major maternal risk factors in hypertensive syndromesArq Bras Cardiol.2008;91(1):11–7.
21. PoonLC, KametasNA, ChelemenT, LealA, NicolaidesKH. Maternal risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a multivariate approachJ Hum Hypertens.2010;24(2):104–10.
22. JacobsDJ, VreeburgSA, DekkerGA, HeardAR, PriestKR, ChanA. Risk factors for hypertension during pregnancy in South AustraliaAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.2003;43(6):421–8.
23. KimballyKG, BarassoumbiH, BuamboSF, GombetT, KibekeP, MonabekaHG, et al.Arterial hypertension: epidemiological aspects and risk factors on pregnant and delivered woman]Dakar Med.2007;52(2):148–52.French
24. LiDK, WiS. Changing paternity and the risk of preeclampsia/eclampsia in the subsequent pregnancyAm J Epidemiol.2000;151(1):57–62.
25. TrupinLS, SimonLP, EskenaziB. Change in paternity: a risk factor for preeclampsia in multi-parasEpidemiology.1996;7(3):240–4.
26. SilvaLM, CoolmanM, SteegersEA, JaddoeVW, MollHA, HofmanA, et al.Low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for preeclampsia: the Generation R StudyJ Hypertens.2008;26(6):1200–8.
27. SilvaL, CoolmanM, SteegersE, JaddoeV, MollH, HofmanA, et al.Maternal educational level and risk of gestational hypertension: the Generation R StudyJ Hum Hypertens.2008;22(7):483–92.
28. MittendorfR, LainKY, WilliamsMA, WalkerCK. Preeclampsia. A nested, case-control study of risk factors and their interactionsJ Reprod Med.1996;41(7):491–6.
29. NajmanJM, MorrisonJ, WilliamsGM, AndersenMJ, KeepingJD. The employment of mothers and the outcomes of their pregnancies: an Australian studyPublic Health.1989;103(3):189–98.
30. JansenPW, TiemeierH, VerhulstFC, BurdorfA, JaddoeVW, HofmanA, et al.Employment status and the risk of pregnancy complications: the Generation R StudyOccup Environ Med.2010;67(6):387–94.
31. El-GilanyAH, El-WehadyA, El-HawaryA. Maternal employment and maternity care in Al-Hassa, Saudi ArabiaEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.2008;13(3):304–12.
32. BaoY, HuY, FuS, ZhangJ, ZhangF, WangX. Studies on relationship between occupation and pregnancy outcome]Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi.1999;33(1):30–3.Chinese
33. CraiciI, WagnerS, GarovicVD. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular risk: formal risk factor or failed stress test?Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis.2008;2(4):249–59.
34. LuealonP, PhupongV. Risk factors of preeclampsia in Thai womenJ Med Assoc Thai.2010;93(6):661–6.
35. HjartardottirS, LeifssonBG, GeirssonRT, Stein-thorsdottirV. Paternity change and the recurrence risk in familial hypertensive disorder in pregnancyHypertens Pregnancy.2004;23(2):219–25.

Tables
[TableWrap ID: T0001] Table 1 

Classification of patients according to their socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics


Socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics Preeclampsia/eclampsia N = 152, N (%) No hypertension N = 414, N (%) Total N = 566, N (%) P-value
Age: Mean (SD) (Range) 23.5 (7.1) (14-42) 24.3 (6.4) (13-43)

Age (groups)
  10-16 years 25 (16.4) 28 (6.8) 53 (9.4) 0.0128
  17-19 years 32 (21.1) 82 (19.8) 114 (20.1)
  20-24 years 32 (21.1) 117 (28.3) 149 (26.3)
  25-29 years 32 (21.1) 92 (22.2) 124 (21.9)
  30-34 years 12 (7.8) 45 (10.8) 57 (10.1)
  35-44 years/ others 19 (12.5) 50 (12.1) 69 (12.2)
Marital status
  Married 144 (94.7) 394 (95.3) 538 (95.0) 0.83
  Others 8 (5.3) 20 (4.7) 28 (5.0)
Husband
  Unmarried 7 (4.6) 16 (3.9) 23 (4.0) 0.8169
  Polygamous 38 (25.0) 96 (23.2) 134 (23.7)
  Monogamous 107 (70.4) 302 (72.9) 409 (72.3)
Education level
  None 74 (48.7) 148 (35.7) 222 (39.2) 0.0127
  Primary 38 (25.0) 147 (35.6) 185 (32.7)
  Secondary/ University 40 (26.3) 119 (28.7) 159 (28.1)
Socio-professional group
  Housewife 142 (93.5) 360 (87.0) 502 (88.7) 0.0313
  Salary owne/ others 10 (6.5) 54 (13.0) 64 (11.3)
History of ectopic pregnancy
  Yes 4 (2.6) 7 (1.7) 11 (1.9) 0.496*
  No 148 (97.4) 407 (98.3) 555 (98.1)
History of abortion
  Yes 34 (22.4) 99 (23.9) 133 (23.5) 0.7008
  No 118 (77.6) 315 (76.1) 433 (76.5)
Number of deliveries
  0 108 (71.1) 236 (57.0) 344 (60.7) < 0.001
  1 21 (13.8) 122 (29.5) 143 (25.3)
  ≥ 2 23 (15.1) 56 (13.5) 79 (14.0)
History of premature delivery
  No 149 (98.0) 407 (98.3) 556 (98.2) 0.732*
  Yes 3 (1.8) 7 (1.7) 10 (1.8)

*Fisher exact test


[TableWrap ID: T0002] Table 2 

Classification of patients according to the personal and family history of hypertension


History of hypertensive disease Preeclampsia/eclampsia N = 152, N (%) No hypertension N = 414, N (%) Total N = 566, N (%) P-value
History of maternal hypertension
  Yes 14 (9.2) 20 (4.8) 34 (6.0) 0.0519
  No 138 (90.8) 394 (95.2) 532 (94.0)
History of brother/sister hypertension
  Yes 13 (8.6) 12 (2.9) 25 (4.4) 0.0037
  No 139 (91.4) 402 (97.1) 541(95.6)
History of paternal hypertension
  Yes 27 (17.8) 27 (6.5) 54 (9.5) <0.0001
  No 125 (82.2) 387 (93.5) 512 (90.5)
History of hypertension in pregnancy
  Yes 22 (14.5) 9 (2.2) 31 (5.5) <0.0001
  No 130 (85.5) 405 (97.8) 535 (94.5)
History of chronic hypertension
  Yes 8 (5.3) 4 (1.0) 12 (2.1) 0.0041*
  No 144 (94.7) 410 (99.0) 554 (97.9)

*Fisher's exact test


[TableWrap ID: T0003] Table 3 

Risk factors for developing hypertensive disorders in pregnancy


Variables Total number of women (N) Preeclampsia/ Eclampsia (N = 152) Rate (%) (Odds Ratio)* (95% CI) P-value (Odds Ratio)** (95% CI) P-valuex
Age
  20-43 years 509 127 25.0 1c 0.0005 1c -
  13-16 years 53 25 47.2 2.6* (1.5 - 4.7) -
Education level
  Others 344 78 22.7 1c 0.0052 1c 0.0177
  None 222 74 33.3 1.7* (1.1 – 2.4) 1.6b (1.0 – 2.3)
Socioprofessional group
  Others 64 10 15.6 1c 0.0313 1c 0.0167
  Housewife 502 142 28.3 2.8* (1.05 – 4.2) 2,8d (1,1-6,9)
Number of deliveries
   ≥ 1 222 44 19.8 1c 0.0024 1c 0.0001
  No delivery 344 108 31.4 1.8* (1.2 - 2.7) 2.8e (1.5 - 3.6)
History of paternal hypertension
  No 512 125 24.4 1c 0.0000 1c -
  Yes 54 27 50.0 3.0* (1.7 – 5.4) -
History of brother/sister hypertension
  No 541 139 25.7 1c 0.0037 1c 0.0014
  Yes 25 13 52.0 3.1* (1.3 – 7.0) 3.6f (1.6 – 8.5)
History of hypertension in pregnancy
  No 535 130 24.3 1c 0.0000 1c 0.0000
  Yes 31 22 71.0 7.6* (3.4 - 16.9) 7.0g (3.0 - 16.4)
History of chronic hypertension
  No 554 144 26.0 1c 0.0016 1c 0.2242
  Yes 12 8 66.7 5.6* (1.6 – 19.1) 2.0h (0.5 – 7.5)

*Non adjusted OR

**Adjusted OR

areference category

badjusted on socio-professional group

cadjusted on level of education, number of deliveries, history of hypertension in siblings, history of hypertension in pregnancy

dadjusted on continuous age and number of deliveries

eadjusted on socio-professional group, history of hypertension in pregnancy, history of chronic hypertension

fadjusted on education level

gadjusted on number of deliveries, history of chronic hypertension

hadjusted on socio-professional group, history of paternal hypertension, history of hypertension in pregnancy



Article Categories:
  • Original Article

Keywords: Hypertension, Pregnancy, Risk factor.