<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">


<journal>
<language>en</language>
<journal_id_issn>1726-7536</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>1735-8507</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_isnet></journal_id_isnet>
<journal_id_iranmedex>69</journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran>2139</journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>288</journal_id_sid>
<pubdate PubStatus="epublish">
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2022</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>26</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>23</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>

<article>
	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
	<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
	<article_id_pubmed>36045884</article_id_pubmed>
	<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
	<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
	<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Dual Trigger with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin of Fresh Autologous Cycles in High Responders: A Systematic Review</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;Background: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of coadministration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) trigger (dual trigger) in high responders for fresh autologous cycles in order to investigate the pregnancy outcomes and rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in comparison to GnRH-a trigger alone.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from inception through February 2020. The included materials were case-control, cohort and, cross-sectional studies as well as clinical trials in which the outcomes of dual trigger with GnRH-a were compared for final oocyte maturation in high responders undergoing GnRH-ant cycles.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: Five retrospective studies were included for this review. Three of the studies showed that the use of dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger resulted in no statistically significant difference in rates of OHSS while achieving a statistically significant difference in favor of the dual trigger group in ongoing pregnancy rates, early pregnancy loss, and fertilization rates.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support improved clinical pregnancy rate, fertilization rate, live birth rate, and early pregnancy loss rate by the use of dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger. Larger double-blind clinical studies are required to properly evaluate the efficacy of this protocol for use in high responders.&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Dual trigger, Fresh autologous cycles, Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), Systematic review</keyword>
	<start_page>03</start_page>
	<end_page>18</end_page>
	<web_url>https://www.jri.ir/article/120139</web_url>
	<pdf_url>https://www.jri.ir/documents/fullpaper/en/120139.pdf</pdf_url>
	<author_list><author><first_name>Andreas A</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Vyrides</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112315</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Essam El</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Mahdi</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Newham University Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112316</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Demetris</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Lamnisos</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112317</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Konstantinos</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Giannakou</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email>K.Giannakou@euc.ac.cy</email><code>112318</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author></author_list>
</article>

</articleset>
</journal>

