<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">


<journal>
<language>en</language>
<journal_id_issn>1726-7536</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>1735-8507</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_isnet></journal_id_isnet>
<journal_id_iranmedex>69</journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran>2139</journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>288</journal_id_sid>
<pubdate PubStatus="epublish">
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2022</year>
	<month>7</month>
	<day>23</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>23</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>

<article>
	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
	<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
	<article_id_pubmed>36415499</article_id_pubmed>
	<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
	<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
	<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Does Embryonic Culture Environment Affect Ploidy Rates in ART Cycles: A Single Center Study in UK</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;Background: The purpose of the current study was to assess whether embryonic culture conditions has an impact on embryo ploidy in a preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: In this retrospective single center cohort study, a total of 1099 blastocysts from 278 PGT-A cycles were analyzed. The generated blastocysts were biopsied on days 5 and 6. Inseminated oocytes were allocated in different incubators (benchtop and time lapse) and assisted zona hatching was performed on day 3 of embryo development to facilitate the biopsy process which was performed on days 5 and 6 (blastocyst stage).&lt;br /&gt;
Results: The average age across the groups was 38.7&amp;plusmn;3.6 years and the total number of mature eggs was 2912 which were randomly distributed across both incubators. The euploidy rate obtained from both groups showed a higher proportion of euploid embryos in the TLM incubator (37.03%, 95% CI 31.9-42.1) compared to those cultured in the BT incubator (30.4%, 95% CI 23.1-37.7). Regression analysis showed that female age remains to be the key variable driving euploidy rates (0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.88) although incubator type could be an important covariable (0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.59). A subgroup analysis of 74 single euploid embryo transfers showed comparable pregnancy and live birth rates.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: This large cohort study demonstrates that uninterrupted controlled culture environment provides increased probability to develop euploid embryo in a PGT-A cycle. However, further evaluation is required to assess how environmental culture conditions at a cellular level could affect epigenetic mechanisms in embryo development and higher aneuploidy rate.&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Benchtop incubator, Blastocyst, Euploi, Time lapse incubato</keyword>
	<start_page>169</start_page>
	<end_page>177</end_page>
	<web_url>https://www.jri.ir/article/120157</web_url>
	<pdf_url>https://www.jri.ir/documents/fullpaper/en/120157.pdf</pdf_url>
	<author_list><author><first_name>Rabi</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Odia</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email>rabiodia@yahoo.co.uk</email><code>41895</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Vinals-Gonzalez</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Xavier</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112424</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Carleen</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Heath</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>41897</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Wael</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Saab</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112098</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Ozkan</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Ozturk</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112294</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Srividya</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Seshadri</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112100</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Paul</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Serha</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>112299</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author></author_list>
</article>

</articleset>
</journal>

