<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">


<journal>
<language>en</language>
<journal_id_issn>1726-7536</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>1735-8507</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_isnet></journal_id_isnet>
<journal_id_iranmedex>69</journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran>2139</journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>288</journal_id_sid>
<pubdate PubStatus="epublish">
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2015</year>
	<month>8</month>
	<day>25</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>16</volume>
<number>4</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>

<article>
	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
	<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
	<article_id_pubmed>27110519</article_id_pubmed>
	<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
	<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
	<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>The Effect of a Newly Designed Needle on the Pain and Bleeding of Patients During Oocyte Retrieval of a Single Follicle</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of needle type on pain and bleeding during oocyte pick-up (OPU).&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: From May through November 2013, patients undergoing OPU from a single follicle without any analgesic treatment were including this study. Eligible patients (n=75) were randomized 1:1 to undergo the procedure with either a reduced needle (17 gauge body, 20 gauge tip; RN group) or a standard needle (19 gauge; SN group). Overall pain was assessed by patients using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and vaginal bleeding after the procedure was recorded. Fisher exact, t-test or Wilcoxon test were used, and p&amp;lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: The percentage of mature oocytes was 86.5% in the RN group and 91.7% in the SN group. Pain during OPU was significantly lower in the RN group than in the SN group (mean VAS score&amp;plusmn;SD: 3.2&amp;plusmn;2.0 &lt;em&gt;cm vs.&lt;/em&gt; 4.9&amp;plusmn;2.2 &lt;em&gt;cm&lt;/em&gt;, p&amp;lt;0.01; mean&amp;plusmn;SD).&amp;nbsp;The frequency of bleeding in the RN group was also significantly lower than that in the SN group (26.3% vs. 48.6%; p&amp;lt;0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to fertilization and pregnancy rates.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: The newly designed needle significantly reduced pain and vaginal bleeding associated with single-follicle OPU in patients receiving no analgesic treatment, in comparison with a standard needle. The RN had no adverse effect on the quality of retrieved oocytes.&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Aspiration needle, Bleeding, Oocyte aspiration, Pain</keyword>
	<start_page>207</start_page>
	<end_page>212</end_page>
	<web_url>https://www.jri.ir/article/656</web_url>
	<pdf_url>https://www.jri.ir/documents/fullpaper/en/656.pdf</pdf_url>
	<author_list><author><first_name>Koji</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Nakagawa</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Division of Reproductive Medicine, Sugiyama Clinic, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email>koji@sugiyama.or.jp</email><code>1521</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Yayoi</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Nishi</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Division of Reproductive Medicine, Sugiyama Clinic, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>1522</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Masayo</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Kaneyama</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Division of Reproductive Medicine, Sugiyama Clinic, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>1523</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Rie</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Sugiyama</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Center for Reproductive Medicine and Endoscopy, Sugiyama Clinic Marunouchi, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>1524</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Hiroshi</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Motoyama</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Center for Reproductive Medicine and Endoscopy, Sugiyama Clinic Marunouchi, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>1525</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Rikikazu</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Sugiyama</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Division of Reproductive Medicine, Sugiyama Clinic, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>1526</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author></author_list>
</article>

</articleset>
</journal>

