<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<XML>
  <JOURNAL>   
    <YEAR>2017</YEAR>
    <VOL>18</VOL>
    <NO>3</NO>
    <MOSALSAL>72</MOSALSAL>
    <PAGE_NO>76</PAGE_NO>  
    <ARTICLES>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>How Can Personalized Medicine Improve Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes?</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>720</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Personalized medicine or precision medicine was first defined for management of cancer patients with the idea that information of patient’s genes, proteins, metabolites and environment can be applied for its individualized management and it encompasses prevention, screening, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, follow up, detection of recurrence and categorization of patient to defined subgroups for more effective treatment. Current evidence suggests the relative success of this approach in cancer patients. The development and implementation of personalized medicine required a set of objectives and valid biomarkers through genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics knowledge of huge samples cohorts regarding confounding factors, such as age, gender, habits, diet, and environment. For the first time, human genome sequencing cost up to $3 billion; however, it costs less than $5000 recently and it continues to decline in price and time rapidly. This is the direct approach for genetic biomarker discovery through genome and transcriptome but the current metabolomics and proteomics techniques require high expertise, labor, and infrastructure, and therefore are more expensive than genomics and transcriptomics technologies at present (1).&lt;br /&gt;
Personalized medicine in reproductive medicine is still in its nonage since it is not yet a fully strengthened mature arena. Reproductive medicine is at the priliminary stage of discovering and validating genomic, protein and metabolite biomarkers. Perhaps what is currently being offered as personalized treatment of infertile patient is more&#160; based on &quot;the best expert opinion of the attending clinician&quot; than &quot; the best evidence-based data available&quot;. Clinicians from all disciplines now accepted the concept &quot;one size does not fit all&quot; accordingly to their practice in diagnosis and treatments should consider patients’ specific molecular profiles. The past and present &quot;one size fits all&quot; practice would inescapably hamper some patients from more efficient treatments. Albert Einstein wrote: &quot;If you want different results, do not do the same&quot;. This concept is representative of our current practice in reproductive medicine; &quot;failed IVF cycles followed by repeating the same cycles for all couples&quot;. Thus, the consequence of this approach is facing with hordes of infertile couples as the victims of repeated implantation failure (RIF) (2).&lt;br /&gt;
Historical facts show that inability of reproductive medicine in applying personalized therapy for efficient treatment is remunerated by transfer of numerous embryos to guarantee higher chance of successful pregnancy. The consequence of this practice is dangerous situations of multiple pregnancies in %30-40 of IVF cycles (3).&lt;br /&gt;
At the first glance, infertility treatment suffers from lack of standardization in the field reproductive medicine.The most evident variations are in oocyte and embryo grading, endometrial assessment, semen analysis, and also in diagnosis and treatment within and between clinics, technicians and physicians that lead to varying success rates between clinics and even different physicians in one clinic. Another feature of reproductive medicine is that it is not &quot;personalized&quot; to only one individual but in reality, you are faced with at least three different individuals; the mother, father and embryos. Another complication is personalization of different biological systems; the egg, sperm, embryo and uterus. Even more importantly, one or more systems may be involved in etiology of infertility and its efficient treatment in a particular couple with great impact on treatment outcomes (3).&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary data on large cohorts of samples revealed genetic biomarkers linked to spontaneous ovulation for PCOS patients, efficacy of low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of spontaneouse abortion, specific allells of FSH receptor linked with OHSS or poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The other clinically available biomarkers are anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) for tailoring gonadotropin dosage, and also the expression of 238 genes as the transcriptomic signature of endometrium entitled as endometrial receptivity array (ERA). It personalized embryo transfer via personalization of implantation window and determination of proper time for embryo transfer in patients with repeated implantation failures (3, 4).&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, reproductive medicine requires identification and verification of ideal biomarkers that personalize the entire process to make possible convenient preventive and/or preferable targeted therapy including prevention, screening, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment such as prediction of ovarian reserve, stimulation outcome, gametes and embryos quality, endometrial receptivity, ectopic pregnancy, and probability of pre-eclampsia and preterm labor. Therefore, the answer to above question would not be very accurate in the present situation. It requires identification of new biomarkers from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data in several available large databases and subsequently verification and validation of each biomarker through prospective large randomized clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>265</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>267</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Mohammad Reza</Name>
<MidName>MR</MidName>
<Family>Sadeghi</Family>
<NameE> محمدرضا</NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE>صادقی</FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>sadeghi@avicenna.ac.ir</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>No Keyword</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>720.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Beim PY, Elashoff M, Hu-Seliger TT. Personalized reproductive medicine on the brink: progress, opportunities and challenges ahead. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(6):611-23.##Sim&#243;n C. Personalized assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):922-3.##Simon C, Sakkas D, Gardner DK, Critchley HO. Biomarkers in reproductive medicine: the quest for new answers. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):695-7.##Collins SC. Precision reproductive medicine: multigene panel testing for infertility risk assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 May 3. [Epub ahead of print].##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>The Challenge of Human Spermatozoa Proteome: A Systematic Review</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>712</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Currently, there are 20,197 human protein-coding genes in the most expertly curated database (UniProtKB/Swiss-Pro). Big efforts have been made by the international consortium, the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project (C-HPP) and independent researchers, to map human proteome. In brief, anno 2017 the human proteome was outlined. The male factor contributes to 50% of infertility in couples. However, there are limited human spermatozoa proteomic studies. Firstly, the development of the mapping of the human spermatozoa was analyzed. The human spermatozoa have been used as a model for missing proteins. It has been shown that human spermatozoa are excellent sources for finding missing proteins. Y chromosome proteome mapping is led by Iran. However, it seems that it is extremely challenging to map the human spermatozoa Y chromosome proteins based on current mass spectrometry-based proteomics technology. Post-translation modifications (PTMs) of human spermatozoa proteome are the most unexplored area and currently the exact role of PTMs in male infertility is unknown. Additionally, the clinical human spermatozoa proteomic analysis, anno 2017 was done in this study.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>267</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>280</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Kambiz</Name>
<MidName>K</MidName>
<Family>Gilany</Family>
<NameE>کامبیز</NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE>گیلانی</FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>k.gilany@avicenna.ac.ir</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Arash</Name>
<MidName>A</MidName>
<Family>Minai-Tehrani</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Nanobiotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Nanobiotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Mehdi</Name>
<MidName>M</MidName>
<Family>Amini</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Niloofar</Name>
<MidName>N</MidName>
<Family>Agharezaee</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Babak</Name>
<MidName>B</MidName>
<Family>Arjmand</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Metabolomics and Genomics Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Metabolomics and Genomics Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>Human</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Proteome</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Proteomics</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Spermatozoa</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Y Chromosome</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>712.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Database issue):D61-5.##Schl&#252;ter H, Apweiler R, Holzh&#252;tter HG, Jungblut PR. Finding one&#39;s way in proteomics: a protein species nomenclature. Chem Cent J. 2009;3:11.##O&#39;Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(10):4007-21.##Crutchfield CA, Thomas SN, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW. Advances in mass spectrometry-based clinical biomarker discovery. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:1.##Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA, Appel RD, Humphery-Smith I, Hochstrasser DF, et al. Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1996;13:19-50.##Bray D. The protein explosion. Nature. 1977;267(5611):481-2.##Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):198-207.##Hondermarck H. Proteomics: biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. 407 p.##Tyers M, Mann M. From genomics to proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):193-7.##Gilany K, Van Elzen R, Mous K, Coen E, Van Dongen W, Vandamme S, et al. The proteome of the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y: an enlarged proteome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1784(7-8):983-5.##Gilany K, Moens L, Dewilde S. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in the life sciences: a review. J Paramed Sci. 2010;1(1).##Tran JC, Zamdborg L, Ahlf DR, Lee JE, Catherman AD, Durbin KR, et al. Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics. Nature. 2011;480(7376):254-8.##Chait BT. Chemistry. Mass spectrometry: bottom-up or top-down? Science. 2006;314(5796):65-6.##Smith LM, Kelleher NL; Consortium for Top Down Proteomics. Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity. Nat Methods. 2013;10(3):186-7.##Patrie SM. Top-down mass spectrometry: proteomics to proteoforms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;919:171-200.##Toby TK, Fornelli L, Kelleher NL. Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2016;9(1):499-519.##Cravatt BF, Simon GM, Yates JR 3rd. The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2007;450(7172):991-1000.##Bensimon A, Heck AJ, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and network biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:379-405.##Legrain P, Aebersold R, Archakov A, Bairoch A, Bala K, Beretta L, et al. The human proteome project: current state and future direction. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(7):M111.009993.##Paik YK, Jeong SK, Omenn GS, Uhlen M, Hanash S, Cho SY, et al. The chromosome-centric human proteome project for cataloging proteins encoded in the genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(3):221-3.##Hancock W, Omenn G, Legrain P, Paik YK. Proteomics, human proteome project, and chromosomes. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(1):210.##Paik YK, Omenn GS, Uhlen M, Hanash S, Marko-Varga G, Aebersold R, et al. Standard guidelines for the chromosome-centric human proteome project. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(4):2005-13.##Omenn GS. The strategy, organization, and progress of the HUPO human proteome project. J Proteomics. 2014;100:3-7.##Marko-Varga G, Omenn GS, Paik YK, Hancock WS. A first step toward completion of a genome-wide characterization of the human proteome. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(1):1-5.##Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, Nirujogi RS, Manda SS, Chaerkady R, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509(7502):575-81.##Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Gholami AM, Lieberenz M, Savitski MM, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509(7502):582-7.##Ezkurdia I, V&#225;zquez J, Valencia A, Tress M. Analyzing the first drafts of the human proteome. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(8):3854-5.##Ezkurdia I, Calvo E, Del Pozo A, V&#225;zquez J, Valencia A, Tress ML. The potential clinical impact of the release of two drafts of the human proteome. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2015;12(6):579-93.##Omenn GS, Lane L, Lundberg EK, Beavis RC, Nesvizhskii AI, Deutsch EW. Metrics for the human proteome project 2015: progress on the human proteome and guidelines for high-confidence protein identification. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(9):3452-60.##Uhl&#233;n M, Fagerberg L, Hallstr&#246;m BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, et al. Proteomics. tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419.##Zhang B, Wang J, Wang X, Zhu J, Liu Q, Shi Z, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2014;513(7518):382-7.##Hathout Y. Proteomic methods for biomarker discovery and validation. Are we there yet? Expert Rev Proteomics. 2015;12(4):329-31.##Aebersold R, Bader GD, Edwards AM, van Eyk JE, Kussmann M, Qin J, et al. The biology/disease-driven human proteome project (B/D-HPP): enabling protein research for the life sciences community. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(1):23-7.##Gilany K, Minai-Tehrani A, Savadi-Shiraz E, Rezadoost H, Lakpour N. Exploring the human seminal plasma proteome: an unexplored gold mine of biomarker for male infertility and male reproduction disorder. J Reprod Infertil. 2015;16(2):61-71.##Kabiri M, Amoozegar MA, Tabebordbar M, Gilany K, Salekdeh GH. Effects of selenite and tellurite on growth, physiology, and proteome of a moderately halophilic bacterium. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(6):3098-108.##Kahn P. From genome to proteome: looking at a cell&#39;s proteins. Science. 1995;270(5235):369-70.##Ainsworth C. Cell biology: the secret life of sperm. Nature. 2005;436(7052):770-1.##Baker MA, Reeves G, Hetherington L, M&#252;ller J, Baur I, Aitken RJ. Identification of gene products present in Triton X-100 soluble and insoluble fractions of human spermatozoa lysates using LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007;1(5):524-32.##Gilany K, Lakpour N, Vafakhah M, Sadeghi MR. The profile of human sperm proteome; a mini-review. J Reprod Infertil. 2011;12(3):193-9.##Wang G, Guo Y, Zhou T, Shi X, Yu J, Yang Y, et al. In-depth proteomic analysis of the human sperm reveals complex protein compositions. J Proteomics. 2013;79:114-22.##Amaral A, Castillo J, Ramalho-Santos J, Oliva R. The combined human sperm proteome: cellular pathways and implications for basic and clinical science. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(1):40-62.##Johnston DS, Wooters J, Kopf GS, Qiu Y, Roberts KP. Analysis of the human sperm proteome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1061:190-202.##de Godoy LM, Olsen JV, de Souza GA, Li G, Mortensen P, Mann M. Status of complete proteome analysis by mass spectrometry: SILAC labeled yeast as a model system. Genome Biol. 2006;7(6):R50.##Geiger T, Wehner A, Schaab C, Cox J, Mann M. Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(3):M111.014050.##Breuza L, Poux S, Estreicher A, Famiglietti ML, Magrane M, Tognolli M, et al. The UniProtKB guide to the human proteome. Database (Oxford). 2016;2016.##ProteomicsDB [Internet]. Technische Universit&#228;t M&#252;nchen (TUM) and SAP SE: Germany; 2014 [cited 2017 July 6]. Available from: https://www.proteomicsdb.org/.##Gaudet P, Michel PA, Zahn-Zabal M, Cusin I, Duek PD, Evalet O, et al. The neXtProt knowledgebase on human proteins: current status. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D764-70.##Vogel C, Abreu Rde S, Ko D, Le SY, Shapiro BA, Burns SC, et al. Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:400.##Beck M, Schmidt A, Malmstroem J, Claassen M, Ori A, Szymborska A, et al. The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:549.##Farrah T, Deutsch EW, Omenn GS, Campbell DS, Sun Z, Bletz JA, et al. A high-confidence human plasma proteome reference set with estimated concentrations in PeptideAtlas. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(9):M110.006353.##Gaudet P, Argoud-Puy G, Cusin I, Duek P, Evalet O, Gateau A, et al. neXtProt: organizing protein knowledge in the context of human proteome projects. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(1):293-8.##Lane L, Bairoch A, Beavis RC, Deutsch EW, Gaudet P, Lundberg E, et al. Metrics for the human proteome project 2013-2014 and strategies for finding missing proteins. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(1):15-20.##Reddy PJ, Ray S, Srivastava S. The quest of the human proteome and the missing proteins: digging deeper. OMICS. 2015;19(5):276-82.##Fago A, Hundahl C, Dewilde S, Gilany K, Moens L, Weber RE. Allosteric regulation and temperature dependence of oxygen binding in human neuroglobin and cytoglobin. molecular mechanisms and physiological significance. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(43):44417-26.##Horvatovich P, Lundberg EK, Chen YJ, Sung TY, He F, Nice EC, et al. Quest for missing proteins: update 2015 on chromosome-centric human proteome project. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(9):3415-31.##Paik YK, Omenn GS, Overall CM, Deutsch EW, Hancock WS. Recent advances in the chromosome-centric human proteome project: missing proteins in the spot light. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(9):3409-14.##Jumeau F, Com E, Lane L, Duek P, Lagarrigue M, Lavigne R, et al. Human spermatozoa as a model for detecting missing proteins in the context of the chromosome-centric human proteome project. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(9):3606-20.##Hosseini Salekdeh Gh. I-49: Human Y chromosome proteomeproject. Int J Fertil Steril. 2010;4(Suppl 1):49.##Goodfellow P, Darling S, Wolfe J. The human Y chromosome. J Med Genet. 1985;22(5):329-44.##German J, Simpson JL, Chaganti RS, Summitt RL, Reid LB, Merkatz IR. Genetically determined sex-reversal in 46,XY humans. Science. 1978;202(4363):53-6.##Pryor JL, Kent-First M, Muallem A, Van Bergen AH, Nolten WE, Meisner L, et al. Microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(8):534-9.##Cooke HJ. Y chromosome and male infertility. Rev Reprod. 1999;4(1):5-10.##Krausz C, McElreavey K. Y chromosome and male infertility. Front Biosci. 1999;4:E1-8.##Jangravi Z, Alikhani M, Arefnezhad B, Sharifi Tabar M, Taleahmad S, Karamzadeh R, et al. A fresh look at the male-specific region of the human Y chromosome. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(1):6-22.##Rengaraj D, Kwon WS, Pang MG. Bioinformatics annotation of human Y chromosome-encoded protein pathways and interactions. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(9):3503-18.##Gilany K, Aerts M, Dewilde S, Devreese B, Moens L, Vafakhah M. Proteome analysis of mouse brain exposed to chronic hypoxia. Cell. 2011;12(4):503-10.##Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D447-52.##Croft D, Mundo AF, Haw R, Milacic M, Weiser J, Wu G, et al. The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D472-7.##Premkumar E, Bhargava PM. Transcription and translation in bovine spermatozoa. Nat New Biol. 1972;240(100):139-43.##Baker MA. The &#39;omics revolution and our understanding of sperm cell biology. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):6-10.##Zhou T, Xia X, Liu J, Wang G, Guo Y, Guo X, et al. Beyond single modification: reanalysis of the acetylproteome of human sperm reveals widespread multiple modifications. J Proteomics. 2015;126:296-302.##Khoury GA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. Proteome-wide post-translational modification statistics: frequency analysis and curation of the swiss-prot database. Sci Rep. 2011;1:90.##Wang G, Wu Y, Zhou T, Guo Y, Zheng B, Wang J, et al. Mapping of the N-linked glycoproteome of human spermatozoa. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(12):5750-9.##Ficarro S, Chertihin O, Westbrook VA, White F, Jayes F, Kalab P, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of capacitated human sperm. evidence of tyrosine phosphorylation of a kinase-anchoring protein 3 and valosin-containing protein/p97 during capacitation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(13):11579-89.##Sun G, Jiang M, Zhou T, Guo Y, Cui Y, Guo X, et al. Insights into the lysine acetylproteome of human sperm. J Proteomics. 2014;109:199-211.##World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. 286 p.##Oliva R, Castillo J, editors. Sperm nucleoproteins. USA: Springer; 2011. 504 p. (Zini A, Agarwal A, editors. Sperm chromatin: Biological and clinical applications in male infertility and assisted reproduction).##de Mateo S, Mart&#237;nez-Heredia J, Estanyol JM, Dom&#237;nguez-Fandos D, Vidal-Taboada JM, Ballesc&#224; JL, et al. Marked correlations in protein expression identified by proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa. Proteomics. 2007;7(23):4264-77.##Aitken RJ, Smith TB, Jobling MS, Baker MA, De Iuliis GN. Oxidative stress and male reproductive health. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(1):31-8.##Hamada A, Sharma R, du Plessis SS, Willard B, Yadav SP, Sabanegh E, et al. Two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis-based proteomics of male gametes in relation to oxidative stress. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1216-26.e2.##Sharma R, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, Hamada AJ, Gopalan B, Willard B, et al. Proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa proteins with oxidative stress. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:48.##Jafarzadeh N, Mani-Varnosfaderani A, Minai-Tehrani A, Savadi-Shiraz E, Sadeghi MR, Gilany K. Metabolomics fingerprinting of seminal plasma from unexplained infertile men: a need for novel diagnostic biomarkers. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(3):150.##Pixton KL, Deeks ED, Flesch FM, Moseley FL, Bj&#246;rndahl L, Ashton PR, et al. Sperm proteome mapping of a patient who experienced failed fertilization at IVF reveals altered expression of at least 20 proteins compared with fertile donors: case report. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(6):1438-47.##Zhao C, Huo R, Wang FQ, Lin M, Zhou ZM, Sha JH. Identification of several proteins involved in regulation of sperm motility by proteomic analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):436-8.##Mart&#237;nez-Heredia J, de Mateo S, Vidal-Taboada JM, Ballesc&#224; JL, Oliva R. Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(4):783-91.##Chan CC, Shui HA, Wu CH, Wang CY, Sun GH, Chen HM, et al. Motility and protein phosphorylation in healthy and asthenozoospermic sperm. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(11):5382-6.##Frapsauce C, Pionneau C, Bouley J, de Larouzi&#232;re V, Berthaut I, Ravel C, et al. [Unexpected in vitro fertilization failure in patients with normal sperm: a proteomic analysis]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009;37(10):796-802. French.##Liao TT, Xiang Z, Zhu WB, Fan LQ. Proteome analysis of round-headed and normal spermatozoa by 2-D fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(6):683-93.##Secciani F, Bianchi L, Ermini L, Cianti R, Armini A, La Sala GB, et al. Protein profile of capacitated versus ejaculated human sperm. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(7):3377-89.##Kriegel TM, Heidenreich F, Kettner K, Pursche T, Hoflack B, Grunewald S, et al. Identification of diabetes- and obesity-associated proteomic changes in human spermatozoa by difference gel electrophoresis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(5):660-70.##Siva AB, Kameshwari DB, Singh V, Pavani K, Sundaram CS, Rangaraj N, et al. Proteomics-based study on asthenozoospermia: differential expression of proteasome alpha complex. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(7):452-62.##Thacker S, Yadav SP, Sharma RK, Kashou A, Willard B, Zhang D, et al. Evaluation of sperm proteins in infertile men: a proteomic approach. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2745-8.##Paasch U, Heidenreich F, Pursche T, Kuhlisch E, Kettner K, Grunewald S, et al. Identification of increased amounts of eppin protein complex components in sperm cells of diabetic and obese individuals by difference gel electrophoresis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(8):M110.007187.##Xu W, Hu H, Wang Z, Chen X, Yang F, Zhu Z, et al. Proteomic characteristics of spermatozoa in normozoospermic patients with infertility. J Proteomics. 2012;75(17):5426-36.##Parte PP, Rao P, Redij S, Lobo V, D&#39;Souza SJ, Gajbhiye R, et al. Sperm phosphoproteome profiling by ultra performance liquid chromatography followed by data independent analysis (LC-MS(E)) reveals altered proteomic signatures in asthenozoospermia. J Proteomics. 2012;75(18):5861-71.##Redgrove KA, Nixon B, Baker MA, Hetherington L, Baker G, Liu DY, et al. The molecular chaperone HSPA2 plays a key role in regulating the expression of sperm surface receptors that mediate sperm-egg recognition. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50851.##Shen S, Wang J, Liang J, He D. Comparative proteomic study between human normal motility sperm and idiopathic asthenozoospermia. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1395-401.##Behrouzi B, Kenigsberg S, Alladin N, Swanson S, Zicherman J, Hong SH, et al. Evaluation of potential protein biomarkers in patients with high sperm DNA damage. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013;59(3):153-63.##Kichine E, Di Falco M, Hales BF, Robaire B, Chan P. Analysis of the sperm head protein profiles in fertile men: consistency across time in the levels of expression of heat shock proteins and peroxiredoxins. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77471.##Intasqui P, Camargo M, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KH, et al. Unraveling the sperm proteome and post-genomic pathways associated with sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(9):1187-202.##Zhu Y, Wu Y, Jin K, Lu H, Liu F, Guo Y, et al. Differential proteomic profiling in human spermatozoa that did or did not result in pregnancy via IVF and AID. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2013;7(11-12):850-8.##Azpiazu R, Amaral A, Castillo J, Estanyol JM, Guimer&#224; M, Ballesc&#224; JL, et al. High-throughput sperm differential proteomics suggests that epigenetic alterations contribute to failed assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1225-37.##Wang S, Wang W, Xu Y, Tang M, Fang J, Sun H, et al. Proteomic characteristics of human sperm cryopreservation. Proteomics. 2014;14(2-3):298-310.##Pilatz A, Lochnit G, Karnati S, Paradowska-Dogan A, Lang T, Schultheiss D, et al. Acute epididymitis induces alterations in sperm protein composition. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1609-17.e1-5.##Frapsauce C, Pionneau C, Bouley J, Delarouziere V, Berthaut I, Ravel C, et al. Proteomic identification of target proteins in normal but nonfertilizing sperm. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(2):372-80.##McReynolds S, Dzieciatkowska M, Stevens J, Hansen KC, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Toward the identification of a subset of unexplained infertility: a sperm proteomic approach. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):692-9.##Liu Y, Guo Y, Song N, Fan Y, Li K, Teng X, et al. Proteomic pattern changes associated with obesity-induced asthenozoospermia. Andrology. 2015;3(2):247-59.##Amaral A, Castillo J, Estanyol JM, Ballesc&#224; JL, Ramalho-Santos J, Oliva R. Human sperm tail proteome suggests new endogenous metabolic pathways. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12(2):330-42.##Cui Z, Sharma R, Agarwal A. Proteomic analysis of mature and immature ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile men. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(5):735-46.##Amaral A, Paiva C, Attardo Parrinello C, Estanyol JM, Ballesc&#224; JL, Ramalho-Santos J, et al. Identification of proteins involved in human sperm motility using high-throughput differential proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(12):5670-84.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Elevated Levels of Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Are Not Related to NK Cell Parameters in Recurrent IVF Failure</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>706</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and NK cells have an inter-related role in angiogenesis that is critical for placentation and success of &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; fertilization. An attempt was made to assess a possible relationship between the two in this study.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: A case control study was performed comparing the serum levels of VEGF-A and its receptor VEGF-R1 with levels of NK cells, activated NK cells and NK cytotoxicity in 62 women with Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF). The healthy control group consisted of 72 women of similar age, without known issues in achieving pregnancy or evidence of autoimmunity. Levels of VEGF-A and VEGF-R1 were quantified by ELISA methods with standard curve interpolation. NK cell subsets were determined with flow cytometry using fluorescent-tagged anti-CD56, anti-CD16, anti-CD3 and anti-CD69. NK cytotoxicity was performed by incubating peripheral blood mononuclear cells and K562 cultured cells with propidium iodide, steroid, intralipid and intravenous immunoglobulin, using previously described methods. Statistical analysis involved Mann-Whitney-U and Spearman’s rank correlation testing with p-values defined as &lt;0.05.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: It was found that VEGF-A levels were significantly raised in women with RIF compared to healthy controls (362.9&lt;em&gt; vs&lt;/em&gt;. 171.6 &lt;em&gt;pg/ml&lt;/em&gt;, p&lt;0.0001), with no difference in VEGF-R1 levels between groups (1499 &lt;em&gt;vs.&lt;/em&gt; 1202 &lt;em&gt;pg/ml&lt;/em&gt;, p=0.4082). There was no correlation between VEGF-A or VEGF-R1 and the absolute levels of circulating NK cells, CD69 activated NK cells or NK cytotoxicity.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: The absence of correlation between VEGF-A or VEGF-R1 and NK cells suggests VEGF secretion and regulation is independent of NK cell activity in RIF.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>280</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>288</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Rhea </Name>
<MidName>R</MidName>
<Family>Bansal</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Brian</Name>
<MidName>B</MidName>
<Family>Ford</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Shree</Name>
<MidName>S</MidName>
<Family>Bhaskaran</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Meenyau</Name>
<MidName>M</MidName>
<Family>Thum</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Fertility Clinic, Lister Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Fertility Clinic, Lister Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Amolak</Name>
<MidName>A</MidName>
<Family>Bansal</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Immunology and Allergy, St Helier Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>amolak.bansal@esth.nhs.uk</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>NK cell cytotoxicity</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Recurrent failed IVF</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (s-FLT-1)</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Vascular endothelial growth factor</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>706.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Tan BK, Vandekerckhove P, Kennedy R, Keay SD. Investigation and current management of recurrent IVF treatment failure in the UK. BJOG. 2005;112(6):773-80.##Polanski LT, Barbosa MA, Martins WP, Baumgarten MN, Campbell B, Brosens J, et al. Interventions to improve reproductive outcomes in women with elevated natural killer cells undergoing assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review of literature. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(1):65-75.##Llurba E, Crispi F, Verlohren S. Update on the pathophysiological implications and clinical role of angiogenic factors in pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;37(2):81-92.##Muttukrishna S, Suri S, Groome N, Jauniaux E. Relationships between TGFbeta proteins and oxygen concentrations inside the first trimester human gestational sac. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2302.##Weimar CH, Kavelaars A, Brosens JJ, Gellersen B, de Vreeden-Elbertse JM, Heijnen CJ, et al. Endometrial stromal cells of women with recurrent miscarriage fail to discriminate between high- and low-quality human embryos. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41424.##Duffy AM, Bouchier-Hayes DJ, Harmey JH. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its role in non-endothelial cells: Autocrine signalling by VEGF. In: Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6482/##Li XF, Charnock-Jones DS, Zhang E, Hiby S, Malik S, Day K, et al. Angiogenic growth factor messenger ribonucleic acids in uterine natural killer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(4):1823-34.##Charnock-Jones DS, Kaufmann P, Mayhew TM. Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. I. Molecular regulation. Placenta. 2004;25(2-3):103-13.##Taylor CM, Stevens H, Anthony FW, Wheeler T. Influence of hypoxia on vascular endothelial growth factor and chorionic gonadotrophin production in the trophoblast-derived cell lines: JEG, JAr and BeWo. Placenta. 1997;18(5-6):451-8.##Waltenberger J, Claesson-Welsh L, Siegbahn A, Shibuya M, Heldin CH. Different signal transduction properties of KDR and Flt1, two receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(43):26988-95.##Gerber HP, Condorelli F, Park J, Ferrara N. Differential transcriptional regulation of the two vascular endothelial growth factor receptor genes. Flt-1, but not Flk-1/KDR, is up-regulated by hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(38):23659-67.##Ratsep MT, Felker AM, Kay VR, Tolusso L, Hofmann AP, Croy BA. Uterine natural killer cells: supervisors of vasculature construction in early decidua basalis. Reproduction. 2015;149(2):R91-102.##Robson A, Harris LK, Innes BA, Lash GE, Aljunaidy MM, Aplin JD, et al. Uterine natural killer cells initiate spiral artery remodeling in human pregnancy. FASEB J. 2012;26(12):4876-85.##Fu B, Li X, Sun R, Tong X, Ling B, Tian Z, et al. Natural killer cells promote immune tolerance by regulating inflammatory TH17 cells at the human maternal-fetal interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(3):E231-40.##Gao Y, Wang PL. Increased CD56( ) NK cells and enhanced Th1 responses in human unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(4):18103-9.##Karami N, Boroujerdnia MG, Nikbakht R, Khodadadi A. Enhancement of peripheral blood CD56(dim) cell and NK cell cytotoxicity in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion or in vitro fertilization failure. J Reprod Immunol. 2012;95(1-2):87-92.##Ghafourian M, Karami N, Khodadadi A, Nikbakht R. Increase of CD69, CD161 and CD94 on NK cells in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion and in vitro fertilization failure. Iran J Immunol. 2014;11(2):84-96.##Thum MY, Bhaskaran S, Abdalla HI, Ford B, Sumar N, Shehata H, et al. An increase in the absolute count of CD56dimCD16 CD69  NK cells in the peripheral blood is associated with a poorer IVF treatment and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2395-400.##Papamitsou T, Toskas A, Papadopoulou K, Sioga A, Lakis S, Chatzistamatiou M, et al. Immunohistochemical study of immunological markers: HLAG, CD16, CD25, CD56 and CD68 in placenta tissues in recurrent pregnancy loss. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29(8):1047-55.##Wang S, Li YP, Ding B, Zhao YR, Chen ZJ, Xu CY, et al. Recurrent miscarriage is associated with a decline of decidual natural killer cells expressing killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors specific for human leukocyte antigen C. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(5):1288-95.##Almasry SM, Elmansy RA, Elfayomy AK, Algaidi SA. Ultrastructure alteration of decidual natural killer cells in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a possible association with impaired decidual vascular remodelling. J Mol Histol. 2015;46(1):67-78.##Jakovljevic A, Bogavac M, Lozanov-Crvenkovic Z, Milosević-Tosic M, Nikolic A, Mitic G. Early pregnancy angiogenic proteins levels and pregnancy related hypertensive disorders. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(5):534-9.##Andraweera PH, Dekker GA, Roberts CT. The vascular endothelial growth factor family in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(4):436-57.##Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, Mondal S, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(5):649-58.##Keskin U, Ulubay M, Dede M, Ozgurtas T, Ko&#231;yigit YK, Aydin FN, et al. The relationship between the VEGF/sVEGFR-1 ratio and threatened abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(3):557-61.##Pang L, Wei Z, Li O, Huang R, Qin J, Chen H, et al. An increase in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF soluble receptor-1 (sFlt-1) are associated with early recurrent spontaneous abortion. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75759.##Xu X, Du C, Li H, Du J, Yan X, Peng L, et al. Association of VEGF genetic polymorphisms with recurrent spontaneous abortion risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123696.##Yalcintepe SA, Silan F, Hacivelioglu SO, Uludag A, Cosar E, Ozdemir O. Fetal Vegf Genotype is More Important for Abortion Risk than Mother Genotype. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2014;3(2):88-94.##Chiossone L, Vacca P, Orecchia P, Croxatto D, Damonte P, Astigiano S, et al. In vivo generation of decidual natural killer cells from resident hematopoietic progenitors. Haematologica. 2014;99(3):448-57.##Lima PD, Tu MM, Rahim MM, Peng AR, Croy BA, Makrigiannis AP. Ly49 receptors activate angiogenic mouse DBA⁺ uterine natural killer cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2014;11(5):467-76.##Zhang J, Dunk CE, Lye SJ. Sphingosine signalling regulates decidual NK cell angiogenic phenotype and trophoblast migration. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(11):3026-37.##Chiba H, Fukui A, Fuchinoue K, Funamizu A, Tanaka K, Mizunuma H. Expression of Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors on and Intracellular Cytokine Production by NK Cells in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75(5):529-38.##Mosimann B, Wagner M, Shehata H, Poon LC, Ford B, Nicolaides KH, et al. Natural killer cells and their activation status in normal pregnancy. Int J Reprod Med. 2013;2013:906813.##Gilman-Sachs A, DuChateau BK, Aslakson CJ, Wohlgemuth GP, Kwak JY, Beer AE, et al. Natural killer (NK) cell subsets and NK cell cytotoxicity in women with histories of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999;41(1):99-105.##Plaisier M, Dennert I, Rost E, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh VW, Helmerhorst FM. Decidual vascularization and the expression of angiogenic growth factors and proteases in first trimester spontaneous abortions. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(1):185-97.##Banerjee P, Ghosh S, Dutta M, Subramani E, Khalpada J, Roychoudhury S, et al. Identification of key contributory factors responsible for vascular dysfunction in idiopathic recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80940.##Col-Madendag I, Madendag Y, Altinkaya S&#214;, Bayramoglu H, Danisman N. The role of VEGF and its receptors in the etiology of early pregnancy loss. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(2):153-6.##Lash GE, Innes BA, Drury JA, Robson SC, Quenby S, Bulmer JN. Localization of angiogenic growth factors and their receptors in the human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle and in recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):183-95.##Almawi WY, Saldanha FL, Mahmood NA, Al-Zaman I, Sater MS, Mustafa FE. Relationship between VEGFA polymorphisms and serum VEGF protein levels and recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2628-35.##Amirchaghmaghi E, Rezaei A, Moini A, Roghaei MA, Hafezi M, Aflatoonian R. Gene expression analysis of VEGF and its receptors and assessment of its serum level in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Cell J. 2015;16(4):538-45.##Muttukrishna S, Swer M, Suri S, Jamil A, Calleja-Agius J, Gangooly S, et al. Soluble Flt-1 and PlGF: new markers of early pregnancy loss? PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e18041.##Fernandes da Silva MO, Elito J Jr, Daher S, Camano L, Fernandes Moron A. Association of serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and early ectopic pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(4):489-91.##Roussev RG, Dons&#39;koi BV, Stamatkin C, Ramu S, Chernyshov VP, Coulam CB, et al. Preimplantation factor inhibits circulating natural killer cell cytotoxicity and reduces CD69 expression: implications for recurrent pregnancy loss therapy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(1):79-87.##Miko E, Manfai Z, Meggyes M, Barakonyi A, Wilhelm F, Varnagy A, et al. Possible role of natural killer and natural killer T-like cells in implantation failure after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(6):750-6.##Kalu E, Bhaskaran S, Thum MY, Vishwanatha R, Croucher C, Sherriff E, et al. Serial estimation of Th1:th2 cytokines profile in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008;59(3):206-11.##Vodolazkaia A, Yesilyurt BT, Kyama CM, Bokor A, Schols D, Huskens D, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in endometriosis: genetic variants and plasma biomarkers. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):988-96.##Sergent F, Hoffmann P, Brouillet S, Garnier V, Salomon A, Murthi P, et al. Sustained Endocrine Gland-Derived Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels Beyond the First Trimester of Pregnancy Display Phenotypic and Functional Changes Associated With the Pathogenesis of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. Hypertension. 2016;68(1):148-56.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Ultra-low Doses of Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Progesterone Attenuate the Severity of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Features in a Hyperandrogenized Mouse Model</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>713</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: Polycystic-ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a reproductive illness characterized by hyperandrogenism and anovulation. Using hyperandrogenized mice, it was demonstrated that the oral administration of incremental dose of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) attenuated some of PCOS characteristics. This work aimed to study the effect of ultra-low doses of combined FSH and progesterone orally administered on PCOS murine model. Moreover, the effect of sequential kinetic activation of administered hormones was tested.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: Thirty-two female mice were used as animal model (four groups of eight animals each). Mice were hyperandrogenized by injection of dehyidroepiandro-sterone diluted in sesame oil. Control group received only oil. Simultaneously, each animal daily received per os an activated or a not-activated combination of FSH (0.44 &lt;em&gt;pg&lt;/em&gt;) plus progesterone (0.44 &lt;em&gt;pg&lt;/em&gt;) or saline solution as control. Serum testosterone, estradiol, progesterone and luteinizing hormone were analyzed as endocrine markers and a morphological study of antral follicle was conducted. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparison test. The p&lt;0.05 was considered significant.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: Dehyidroepiandrosterone treatment increased both estradiol and progesterone serum levels, besides testosterone, while reduced luteinizing hormone (p&lt;0.05); histological examination revealed an increase of cystic follicles (p&lt;0.05). Irrespective of activation, the combined FSH and progesterone treatments restored estradiol level (p&gt;0.05 &lt;em&gt;vs.&lt;/em&gt; control group) and reduced cystic signs in the follicles (p&lt;0.05 &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt;. dehyidroepiandrosterone treatment).&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: This study indicate that ultra-low doses of FSH and progesterone orally administrated can reduce the sternness of PCOS in the mouse model and open a route for the study of innovative approaches for PCOS treatment.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>288</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>298</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Irene</Name>
<MidName>I</MidName>
<Family>Tessaro</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Silvia</Name>
<MidName>S</MidName>
<Family>Modina</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Valentina </Name>
<MidName>V</MidName>
<Family>Lodde</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Giulia</Name>
<MidName>G</MidName>
<Family>Sivelli</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Federica</Name>
<MidName>F</MidName>
<Family>Franciosi</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Laura</Name>
<MidName>L</MidName>
<Family>Terzaghi</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Patrizia</Name>
<MidName>P</MidName>
<Family>Luchini</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Cristiano</Name>
<MidName>C</MidName>
<Family>Rumio</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Interdepartmental Centre for the Study of Biological Effects of Nano-Concentrations (CREBION), University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Interdepartmental Centre for the Study of Biological Effects of Nano-Concentrations (CREBION), University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Alberto</Name>
<MidName>AM</MidName>
<Family>Luciano</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Italy</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>alberto.luciano@unimi.it</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>Follicle cyst</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>FSH</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Mouse</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Polycystic ovary syndrome</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Progesterone</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Sequential kinetic activation</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Ultra-low dose</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>713.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Barthelmess EK, Naz RK. Polycystic ovary syndrome: current status and future perspective. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2014;6:104-19.##Franks S, Stark J, Hardy K. Follicle dynamics and anovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(4):367-78.##Webber LJ, Stubbs S, Stark J, Trew GH, Margara R, Hardy K, et al. Formation and early development of follicles in the polycystic ovary. Lancet. 2003;362(9389):1017-21.##Burt Solorzano CM, Beller JP, Abshire MY, Collins JS, McCartney CR, Marshall JC. Neuroendocrine dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome. Steroids. 2012;77(4):332-7.##Marshall JC, Dalkin AC, Haisenleder DJ, Paul SJ, Ortolano GA, Kelch RP. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulses: regulators of gonadotropin synthesis and ovulatory cycles. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1991;47:155-87; discussion 188-9.##Blank SK, McCartney CR, Marshall JC. The origins and sequelae of abnormal neuroendocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(4):351-61.##McCartney CR, Eagleson CA, Marshall JC. Regulation of gonadotropin secretion: implications for polycystic ovary syndrome. Semin Reprod Med. 2002;20(4):317-26.##Franks S, Gilling-Smith C, Watson H, Willis D. Insulin action in the normal and polycystic ovary. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1999;28(2):361-78.##Qu J, Wang Y, Wu X, Gao L, Hou L, Erkkola R. Insulin resistance directly contributes to androgenic potential within ovarian theca cells. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5 Suppl):1990-7.##Sirmans SM, Pate KA. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;6:1-13.##Van Der Meer M, Hompes PG, De Boer JA, Schats R, Schoemaker J. Cohort size rather than follicle-stimulating hormone threshold level determines ovarian sensitivity in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(2):423-6.##Perales-Puchalt A, Legro RS. Ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Steroids. 2013;78(8):767-72.##Swanton A, Storey L, McVeigh E, Child T. IVF outcome in women with PCOS, PCO and normal ovarian morphology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149(1):68-71.##Homburg R, Howles CM. Low-dose FSH therapy for anovulatory infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: rationale, results, reflections and refinements. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(5):493-9.##Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):505-22.##Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on women&#39;s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):14-24.##Orvieto R, Homburg R. Chronic ultra-low dose follicle-stimulating hormone regimen for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: one click, one follicle, one pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4 Suppl):1533-5.##Walters KA, Allan CM, Handelsman DJ. Rodent models for human polycystic ovary syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2012;86(5):149, 1-12.##Shi D, Vine DF. Animal models of polycystic ovary syndrome: a focused review of rodent models in relationship to clinical phenotypes and cardiometabolic risk. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):185-93.##McNeilly AS, Duncan WC. Rodent models of polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;373(1-2):2-7.##Tessaro I, Modina SC, Franciosi F, Sivelli G, Terzaghi L, Lodde V, et al. Effect of oral administration of low-dose follicle stimulating hormone on hyperandrogenized mice as a model of polycystic ovary syndrome. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:64.##Avvakumov E, Chizhevskaya S, Stoyanov E, Povetkina M, Chekmarev A, Shafirov V. Influence of the nature of components in mechanically activated mixture of zirconium and silicon oxides on solid-phase synthesis of zircon. Russ J Appl Chem. 1999;72(9):1498-503.##Zec S, Boskovic S. Cerium silicates formation from mechanically activated oxide mixtures. J Mater Sci. 2004;39(16):5283-6.##Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412.##Lai H, Jia X, Yu Q, Zhang C, Qiao J, Guan Y, et al. High-fat diet induces significant metabolic disorders in a mouse model of polycystic ovary syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2014;91(5):127.##Gariboldi S, Palazzo M, Zanobbio L, Dusio GF, Mauro V, Solimene U, et al. Low dose oral administration of cytokines for treatment of allergic asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2009;22(6):497-510.##Barygina V, Becatti M, Lotti T, Moretti S, Taddei N, Fiorillo C. Treatment with low-dose cytokines reduces oxidative-mediated injury in perilesional keratinocytes from vitiligo skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2015;79(2):163-70.##Modina SC, Tessaro I, Lodde V, Franciosi F, Corbani D, Luciano AM. Reductions in the number of mid-sized antral follicles are associated with markers of premature ovarian senescence in dairy cows. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014;26(2):235-44.##Griffin J, Emery BR, Huang I, Peterson CM, Carrell DT. Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human). J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2006;3:2.##Pedersen T, Peters H. Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil. 1968;17(3):555-7.##Wang XN, Roy SK, Greenwald GS. In vitro DNA synthesis by isolated preantral to preovulatory follicles from the cyclic mouse. Biol Reprod. 1991;44(5):857-63.##Anderson E, Lee MT, Lee GY. Cystogenesis of the ovarian antral follicle of the rat: ultrastructural changes and hormonal profile following the administration of dehydroepiandrosterone. Anat Rec. 1992;234(3):359-82.##Luchetti CG, Solano ME, Sander V, Arcos ML, Gonzalez C, Di Girolamo G, et al. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone on ovarian cystogenesis and immune function. J Reprod Immunol. 2004;64(1-2):59-74.##Manner&#229;s L, Cajander S, Holm&#228;ng A, Seleskovic Z, Lystig T, L&#246;nn M, et al. A new rat model exhibiting both ovarian and metabolic characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology. 2007;148(8):3781-91.##Peluso JJ, England-Charlesworth C. Formation of ovarian cysts in aged irregularly cycling rats. Biol Reprod. 1981;24(5):1183-90.##Peluso JJ, England-Charlesworth C, Bolender DL, Steger RW. Ultrastructural alterations associated with the initiation of follicular atresia. Cell Tissue Res. 1980;211(1):105-15.##Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA, Hoeger KM, Murad MH, Pasquali R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):4565-92.##Conway G, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Franks S, Gambineri A, et al. The polycystic ovary syndrome: a position statement from the European Society of Endocrinology. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(4):P1-29.##Azziz R, Marin C, Hoq L, Badamgarav E, Song P. Health care-related economic burden of the polycystic ovary syndrome during the reproductive life span. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4650-8.##Raja-Khan N, Stener-Victorin E, Wu X, Legro RS. The physiological basis of complementary and alternative medicines for polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011;301(1):E1-E10.##Passalacqua R, Caminiti C, Buti S, Porta C, Camisa R, Braglia L, et al. Adjuvant low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus interferon-α (IFN-α) in operable renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a phase III, randomized, multicentre trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC). J Immunother. 2014;37(9):440-7.##Radice E, Miranda V, Bellone G. Low-doses of sequential-kinetic-activated interferon-γ enhance the ex vivo cytotoxicity of peripheral blood natural killer cells from patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. A preliminary study. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014;19(1):66-73.##Roberti ML, Ricottini L, Capponi A, Sclauzero E, Vicenti P, Fiorentini E, et al. Immunomodulating treatment with low dose interleukin-4, interleukin-10 and interleukin-11 in psoriasis vulgaris. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2014;28(1):133-9.##van Houten EL, Visser JA. Mouse models to study polycystic ovary syndrome: a possible link between metabolism and ovarian function? Reprod Biol. 2014;14(1):32-43.##Loughlin T, Cunningham S, Moore A, Culliton M, Smyth PP, McKenna TJ. Adrenal abnormalities in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62(1):142-7.##Elia E, Sander V, Luchetti CG, Solano ME, Di Girolamo G, Gonzalez C, et al. The mechanisms involved in the action of metformin in regulating ovarian function in hyperandrogenized mice. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;12(8):475-81.##Sander V, Luchetti CG, Solano ME, Elia E, Di Girolamo G, Gonzalez C, et al. Role of the N, N&#39;-dimethylbiguanide metformin in the treatment of female prepuberal BALB/c mice hyperandrogenized with dehydroepiandrosterone. Reproduction. 2006;131(3):591-602.##Solano ME, Sander VA, Ho H, Motta AB, Arck PC. Systemic inflammation, cellular influx and up-regulation of ovarian VCAM-1 expression in a mouse model of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). J Reprod Immunol. 2011;92(1-2):33-44.##Fauser BC, Van Heusden AM. Manipulation of human ovarian function: physiological concepts and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev. 1997;18(1):71-106.##Doldi N, Gessi A, Destefani A, Calzi F, Ferrari A. Polycystic ovary syndrome: anomalies in progesterone production. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(2):290-3.##Montville CP, Khabbaz M, Aubuchon M, Williams DB, Thomas MA. Luteal support with intravaginal progesterone increases clinical pregnancy rates in women with polycystic ovary syndrome using letrozole for ovulation induction. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):678-83.##Buckler HM, Phillips SE, Cameron IT, Healy DL, Burger HG. Vaginal progesterone administration before ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins in polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67(2):300-6.##Taylor AE, McCourt B, Martin KA, Anderson EJ, Adams JM, Schoenfeld D, et al. Determinants of abnormal gonadotropin secretion in clinically defined women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(7):2248-56.##Giudice LC. Endometrium in PCOS: Implantation and predisposition to endocrine CA. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;20(2):235-44.##Palomba S, Santagni S, La Sala GB. Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue? J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:77.##Apparao KB, Lovely LP, Gui Y, Lininger RA, Lessey BA. Elevated endometrial androgen receptor expression in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2002;66(2):297-304.##Franks S, Mason H, Willis D. Follicular dynamics in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;163(1-2):49-52.##Roy SK, Greenwald GS. In vitro steroidogenesis by primary to antral follicles in the hamster during the periovulatory period: effects of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and prolactin. Biol Reprod. 1987;37(1):39-46.##Roy SK, Greenwald GS. In vitro effects of epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I, fibroblast growth factor, and follicle-stimulating hormone on hamster follicular deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and steroidogenesis. Biol Reprod. 1991;44(5):889-96.##Campion CE, Trewin AL, Hutz RJ. Effects of follicle-stimulating hormone administration on oestradiol-induced cystic ovaries in guinea pigs. Zoolog Sci. 1996;13(1):137-42.##Greenwald GS, Roy SK. Follicular development and its control. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994. p. 629-724.##Lederer KJ, Luciano AM, Pappalardo A, Peluso JJ. Proliferative and steroidogenic capabilities of rat granulosa cells of different sizes. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;103(1):47-54.##Mahato RI, Narang AS, Thoma L, Miller DD. Emerging trends in oral delivery of peptide and protein drugs. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2003;20(2-3):153-214.##Sun L. Peptide-Based Drug Development. Mod Chem Appl. 2013;1(1):1-2.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Computational Analysis of High Risk Missense Variant in Human UTY Gene: A Candidate Gene of AZFa Sub-region</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>715</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: The human Ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat gene, Y-linked (UTY) gene encodes histone demethylase involved in protein-protein interactions. UTY protein evidence at protein level predicted intracellular and secreted protein. UTY is also involved in spermatogenesis process.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: The high-risk non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism in the coding region of the UTY gene was screened by SNP database and identified missense variants were subjected to computational analysis to understand the effect on protein function, stability and structure by SIFT, PolyPhen 2, PANTHER, PROVEAN, I-Mutant 2, iPTREE-STAB, ConSurf, ModPred, SPARKS-X, QMEAN, PROCHECK, project HOPE and STRING.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: A total of 151 nsSNPs variants were retrieved in UTY gene out of which one missense variant (E18D) was predicted to be damaging or deleterious using SIFT, PolyPhen 2, PANTHER and PROVEAN. Additionally, E18D variant showed less stability, high conservation and having role in post translation modification using i-Mutant 2 and iPTREE-STAB, ConSurf and ModPred, respectively. The predicted 3D model of UTY using SPARKS-X with z-score of 15.16 was generated and validated via QMEAN (Z-score of 0.472) and PROCHECK which plots Ramachandran plot (85.3% residues in most favored regions, 12.3% in additionally allowed regions, 2.0% in generously allowed regions and 4.0% were in disallowed regions) and it indicates a good quality model. STRING showed that UTY interacts with ten different proteins.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: This study revealed that SNP data available on database was deduced to find out the most damaging nsSNPs &lt;em&gt;i.e&lt;/em&gt;. rs3212293 (E18D). Therefore, it provides useful information about functional SNPs for future prospects concerning infertility in men.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>298</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>307</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Mili</Name>
<MidName>M</MidName>
<Family>Nailwal</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>P.G. Department of Genetics, Ashok &amp;amp; Rita Patel Institute of Integrated Study &amp;amp; Research in Biotechnology and Allied Sciences (ARIBAS)</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>P.G. Department of Genetics, Ashok &amp; Rita Patel Institute of Integrated Study &amp; Research in Biotechnology and Allied Sciences (ARIBAS)</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Jenabhai</Name>
<MidName>JB</MidName>
<Family>Chauhan</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>P.G. Department of Genetics, Ashok &amp;amp; Rita Patel Institute of Integrated Study &amp;amp; Research in Biotechnology and Allied Sciences (ARIBAS)</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>P.G. Department of Genetics, Ashok &amp; Rita Patel Institute of Integrated Study &amp; Research in Biotechnology and Allied Sciences (ARIBAS)</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Iran</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>jenabhaichauhan@aribas.edu.in, jbc109@gmail.com, chauhanjena@gmail.com</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>AZFa</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Computational analysis</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Male infertility</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Missense</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>nsSNP</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>UTY gene</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>715.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Naasse Y, Charoute H, El Houate B, Elbekkay C, Razoki L, Malki A, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men from Morocco. BMC Urol. 2015;15:95.##Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility--a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):575-88.##Kleiman SE, Almog R, Yogev L, Hauser R, Lehavi O, Paz G, et al. Screening for partial AZFa microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men: is it of clinical relevance? Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):43-7.##Nailwal M, Chauhan JB. Genetic investigation at azoospermia factor region for male infertility. Indo Am J Pharm Sci. 2016;3(12):1498-1510.##Masoudi R, Mazaheri-Asadi L. Y chromosome mi-crodeletions in infertile men from south west of Iran. International Conference on Chemical, Environmental and Biological Sciences; 2015 March 18-19; Dubai: International Institute of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering. 2015. p. 110-12.##Ambulkar P, Chuadhary A, Waghmare J, Tarnekar A, Pal A. Prevalence of Y Chromosome Microdeletions in Idiopathic Azoospermia Cases in Central Indian Men. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(9):GC01-4.##Sun C, Skaletsky H, Rozen S, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E, Oates R, Page DC. Deletion of azoospermia factor a (AZFa) region of human Y chromosome caused by recombination between HERV15 proviruses. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(15):2291-6.##Greenfield A, Carrel L, Pennisi D, Philippe C, Quaderi N, Siggers P, et al. The UTX gene escapes X inactivation in mice and humans. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7(4):737-42.##Shen P, Wang F, Underhill PA, Franco C, Yang WH, Roxas A, et al. Population genetic implications from sequence variation in four Y chromosome genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(13):7354-9.##Abilash VG, Ramgir Sh. Genetic and environmental factors involved in human male infertility: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;8(6):34-43.##Foresta C, Moro E, Ferlin A. Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(2):226-39.##Vineeth VS, Malini SS. A journey on Y chromosomal genes and male infertility. Int J Hum Genet. 2011;11(4):203-15.##Drazen JM, Yandava CN, Dub&#233; L, Szczerback N, Hippensteel R, Pillari A, et al. Pharmacogenetic association between ALOX5 promoter genotype and the response to anti-asthma treatment. Nat Genet. 1999;22(2):168-70.##Akhoundi F, Parvaneh N, Modjtaba EB. In silico analysis of deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms in human BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase B gene. Meta Gene. 2016;9:142-50.##Rasal KD, Shah TM, Vaidya M, Jakhesara SJ, Joshi CG. Analysis of consequences of non-synonymous SNP in feed conversion ratio associated TGF-β receptor type 3 gene in chicken. Meta Gene. 2015;4:107-17.##Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073-81.##Sen S, Pasi AR, Dada R, Shamsi MB, Modi D. Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men: prevalence, phenotypes and screening markers for the Indian population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(3):413-22.##Liu XG, Hu HY, Guo YH, Sun YP. Correlation between Y chromosome microdeletion and male infertility. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(2).##Benoff SH, Millan C, Hurley IR, Napolitano B, Marmar JL. Bilateral increased apoptosis and bilateral accumulation of cadmium in infertile men with left varicocele. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(3):616-27.##Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3812-4.##Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248-9.##Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, Guo N, Mi H, Campbell MJ, Muruganujan A, et al. Applications for protein sequence-function evolution data: mRNA/protein expression analysis and coding SNP scoring tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W645-50.##Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46688.##Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R. I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W306-10.##Huang LT, Saraboji K, Ho SY, Hwang SF, Ponnuswamy MN, Gromiha MM. Prediction of protein mutant stability using classification and regression tool. Biophys Chem. 2007;125(2-3):462-70.##Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W529-33.##Pejaver V, Hsu WL, Xin F, Dunker AK, Uversky VN, Radivojac P. The structural and functional signatures of proteins that undergo multiple events of post-translational modification. Protein Sci. 2014;23(8):1077-93.##Yang Y, Faraggi E, Zhao H, Zhou Y. Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2076-82.##Venselaar H, Te Beek TA, Kuipers RK, Hekkelman ML, Vriend G. Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:548.##Benkert P, Biasini M, Schwede T. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(3):343-50.##Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J App Cryst. 1993;26:283-91.##von Mering C, Jensen LJ, Snel B, Hooper SD, Krupp M, Foglierini M, et al. STRING: known and predicted protein-protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Database issue):D433-7.##Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2129-41.##Teng S, Srivastava AK, Wang L. Sequence feature-based prediction of protein stability changes upon amino acid substitutions. BMC Genomics. 2010;11 Suppl 2:S5.##Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schomburg D. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins. 2008;71(1):261-77.##Datta A, Mazumder MH, Chowdhury AS, Hasan MA. Functional and structural consequences of damaging single nucleotide polymorphisms in human prostate cancer predisposition gene RNASEL. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:271458.##Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, Muller J, et al. STRING 8--a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D412-6.##Miller MP, Kumar S. Understanding human disease mutations through the use of interspecific genetic variation. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(21):2319-28.##Srivastava M, Gupta SK, Abhilash PC, Singh N. Structure prediction and binding sites analysis of curcin protein of Jatropha curcas using computational approaches. J Mol Model. 2012;18(7):2971-9.##Chen X, Sullivan PF. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping: biochemistry, protocol, cost and throughput. Pharmacogenomics J. 2003;3(2):77-96.##Nailwal M, Chauhan JB. Analysis of consequences of non-synonymous SNPs of USP9Y gene in human using bioinformatics tools. Meta Gene. 2017;12:13-7.##Nailwal M, Chauhan JB. In silico analysis of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in human DAZL gene associated with male infertility. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2017;1-11.##de Carvalho MD, De Mesquita JF. Structural modeling and in silico analysis of human superoxide dismutase 2. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65558.##George Priya Doss C, Rajith B. A new insight into structural and functional impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in PTEN gene. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;66(2):249-63.##Thusberg J, Vihinen M. Pathogenic or not? And if so, then how? Studying the effects of missense mutations using bioinformatics methods. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(5):703-14.##Hicks S, Wheeler DA, Plon SE, Kimmel M. Prediction of missense mutation functionality depends on both the algorithm and sequence alignment employed. Hum Mutat. 2011;32(6):661-8.##Hussain MR, Shaik NA, Al-Aama JY, Asfour HZ, Khan FS, Masoodi TA, et al. In silico analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in human BRAF gene. Gene. 2012;508(2):188-96.##Mohamoud HS, Hussain MR, El-Harouni AA, Shaik NA, Qasmi ZU, Merican AF, et al. First comprehensive in silico analysis of the functional and structural consequences of SNPs in human GalNAc-T1 gene. Comput Math Methods Med. 2014;2014:904052.##Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D561-8.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Y Chromosome Microdeletions in Infertile Men with Non-obstructive Azoospermia and Severe Oligozoospermia</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>714</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: The purpose of the study was to investigate the frequencies and types of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men and to analyze the relationship between the levels of reproductive hormones and Y microdeletions.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: A total of 1,226 infertile men were screened for Y chromosome microdeletions using multiplex PCR assay. Karyotype analysis was performed on peripheral blood lymphocytes with standard G-banding. Serum reproductive hormone levels were measured.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: Out of 1,226 infertile patients, 134 (10.93%) had Y microdeletions. One hundred seven of 765 (13.99%) non-obstructive azoospermic patients and 27 of 133 (20.30%) severe oligozoospermic patients had Y microdeletions. Among the 134 infertile men with Y microdeletions, the most frequent microdeletions were detected in the AZFc region, followed by AZFbc, AZFb, AZFa, AZFabc(Yq), Yp(SRY)+Yq, and partial AZFc regions. Karyotype analysis was available for 130 of the 134 patients with Y microdeletions. Of them, 36 (27.69%) patients had sex chromosomal abnormalities. Levels of FSH and LH in patients with AZFc microdeletion were significantly lower, while those in patients with Yp(SRY)+Yq were significantly higher than in patients without Y microdeletions. Level of testosterone in patients with AZFabc(Yq) or Yp(SRY)+Yq was significantly lower than that in patients without Y microdeletions. However, there was no significant difference in the levels of reproductive hormones between all patients with and without Y microdeletions.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: These results highlight the need for Y chromosome microdeletion screening for correct diagnosis of male infertility. Obtaining reliable genetic information for assisted reproductive techniques can prevent unnecessary treatment and vertical transmission of genetic defects to offspring.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>307</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>316</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Shin</Name>
<MidName>SY</MidName>
<Family>Kim</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&amp;#39;s Healthcare Center</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&#39;s Healthcare Center</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Korea</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Hyun</Name>
<MidName>HJ</MidName>
<Family>Kim</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&amp;#39;s Healthcare Center</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&#39;s Healthcare Center</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Korea</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Bom</Name>
<MidName>BY</MidName>
<Family>Lee</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&amp;#39;s Healthcare Center</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&#39;s Healthcare Center</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Korea</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>So</Name>
<MidName>SY</MidName>
<Family>Park</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&amp;#39;s Healthcare Center</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Cheil General Hospital and Women&#39;s Healthcare Center</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Korea</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Hyo</Name>
<MidName>HS</MidName>
<Family>Lee</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Urology, Cheil General Hospital and Women&amp;#39;s Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Urology, Cheil General Hospital and Women&#39;s Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Korea</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Ju</Name>
<MidName>JT</MidName>
<Family>Seo</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Urology, Cheil General Hospital and Women&amp;#39;s Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Urology, Cheil General Hospital and Women&#39;s Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Korea</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>jtandro@cgh.co.kr</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>Male infertility</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Non-obstructive azoospermia</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Reproductive hormone</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Severe oligozoospermia</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Y chromosome microdeletion</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>714.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Hopps CV, Mielnik A, Goldstein M, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(8):1660-5.##Mohammed F, Al-Yatama F, Al-Bader M, Tayel SM, Gouda S, Naguib KK. Primary male infertility in Kuwait: a cytogenetic and molecular study of 289 infertile Kuwaiti patients. Andrologia. 2007;39(3):87-92.##Jarow JP, Troiani J, McNellis D, Wiederhorn R, Fang G, Handelsman H. Use of biomarkers to assess tissue specific androgen adequacy: defining male hypogonadism. J Urol. 2013;189(2):633-7.##Bonde JP. Occupational causes of male infertility. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20(3):234-9.##Krausz C, Degl&#39;Innocenti S. Y chromosome and male infertility: update, 2006. Front Biosci. 2006;11:3049-61.##Mitra A, Dada R, Kumar R, Gupta NP, Kucheria K, Gupta SK. Screening for Y-chromosome microdeletions in infertile Indian males: utility of simplified multiplex PCR. Indian J Med Res. 2008;127(2):124-32.##Vogt PH, Edelmann A, Kirsch S, Henegariu O, Hirschmann P, Kiesewetter F. Human Y chromosome azoospermia factors (AZF) mapped to different subregions in Yq11. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5(7):933-43.##Foresta C, Ferlin A, Garolla A, Moro E, Pistorello M, Barbaux S, et al. High frequency of well-defined Y-chromosome deletions in idiopathic Sertoli cell-only syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(2):302-7.##Foresta C, Moro E, Ferlin A. Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(2):226-39.##Bor P, Hindkjaer J, K&#248;lvraa S, Ingerslev HJ. Y-chromosome microdeletions and cytogenetic findings in unselected ICSI candidates at a Danish fertility clinic. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19(5):224-31.##World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. 286 p.##Park SH, Lee HS, Choe JH, Lee JS, Seo JT. Success rate of microsurgical multiple testicular sperm extraction and sperm presence in the ejaculate in korean men with y chromosome microdeletions. Korean J Urol. 2013;54(8):536-40.##van der Ven K, Montag M, Peschka B, Leygraaf J, Schwanitz G, Haidl G, et al. Combined cytogenetic and Y chromosome microdeletion screening in males undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Mol Hum Reprod. 1997;3(8):699-704.##Kumtepe Y, Beyazyurek C, Cinar C, Ozbey I, Ozkan S, Cetinkaya K, et al. A genetic survey of 1935 Turkish men with severe male factor infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(4):465-74.##Fu L, Xiong DK, Ding XP, Li C, Zhang LY, Ding M, et al. Genetic screening for chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in Chinese infertile men. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(6):521-7.##Zhu YJ, Liu SY, Wang H, Wei P, Ding XP. The prevalence of azoospermia factor microdeletion on the Y chromosome of Chinese infertile men detected by multi-analyte suspension array technology. Asian J Androl. 2008;10(6):873-81.##Al-Achkar W, Wafa A, Moassass F. Cytogenetic abnormalities and Y-chromosome microdeletions in infertile Syrian males. Biomed Rep. 2013;1(2):275-279.##Ferlin A, Arredi B, Speltra E, Cazzadore C, Selice R, Garolla A, et al. Molecular and clinical characterization of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men: a 10-year experience in Italy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):762-70.##Simoni M1, T&#252;ttelmann F, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E. Clinical consequences of microdeletions of the Y chromosome: the extended M&#252;nster experience. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16(2):289-303.##Silber SJ, Nagy Z, Devroey P, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC. Distribution of spermatogenesis in the testicles of azoospermic men: the presence or absence of spermatids in the testes of men with germinal failure. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2422-8.##Machev N, Saut N, Longepied G, Terriou P, Navarro A, Levy N, et al. Sequence family variant loss from the AZFc interval of the human Y chromosome, but not gene copy loss, is strongly associated with male infertility. J Med Genet. 2004;41(11):814-25.##Repping S, Skaletsky H, Brown L, van Daalen SK, Korver CM, Pyntikova T, et al. Polymorphism for a 1.6-Mb deletion of the human Y chromosome persists through balance between recurrent mutation and haploid selection. Nat Genet. 2003;35(3):247-51.##G&#252;nd&#252;z G, L&#252;leci G, Baykara M. Cytogenetic study in 102 infertile men. Urol Int. 1998;61(1):32-4.##Kleiman SE, Yogev L, Gamzu R, Hauser R, Botchan A, Lessing JB, et al. Genetic evaluation of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):33-8.##Willis MJ, Bird LM, Dell&#39;aquilla M, Jones MC. Natural history of prenatally diagnosed 46,X,isodicentric Y. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(2):134-7.##Kim JW, Park SY, Ryu HM, Lee DE, Lee BY, Kim SY, et al. Molecular and clinical characteristics of 26 cases with structural Y chromosome aberrations. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2012;136(4):270-7.##Zhang YS, Dai RL, Wang RX, Zhang ZH, Fadlalla E, Liu RZ. Azoospermia factor microdeletions: occurrence in infertile men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia from China. Andrologia. 2014;46(5):535-40.##Abid S, Maitra A, Meherji P, Patel Z, Kadam S, Shah J, et al. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of idiopathic male infertility in a secondary referral center in India. J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22(1):29-38.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Is More Successful After r-hCG Administration Than Spontaneous LH Surge</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>716</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether clinical pregnancy rate is affected by timing intrauterine insemination (IUI) according to serum LH surge, r-hCG trigger, or a combination of LH surge and r-hCG trigger in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles for patients with a variety of infertility etiologies.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: The last 365 consecutive COH-IUI cycles performed at ONE Fertility Burlington in 2014 were reviewed and categorized according to method of IUI timing. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using a combination of Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact tests, and between continuous variables using independent sample t-tests and logistic regression to a level of significance of p&lt;0.05.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: The overall clinical pregnancy rate in this sample was 18.1% (66/365). Administration of r-hCG prior to IUI resulted in a higher clinical pregnancy rate compared with spontaneous serum LH surge: 18.2% &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt;. 5.8%, p=0.012. Patients in whom r-hCG was administered concomitantly with a serum LH surge had a higher clinical pregnancy than the r-hCG trigger group (30.8% &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt;. 18.2%, p=0.004) and LH surge group (30.8% &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt;. 5.8%, p&lt;0.001). A sub-group analysis revealed that patients receiving r-FSH, rather than clomiphene or letrozole, had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate after r-hCG trigger as compared to the LH surge group (21.7% &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt;. 2.1%, p=0.01).&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: In subfertile couples undergoing COH-IUI, r-hCG administration was associated with an increased clinical pregnancy rate compared with spontaneous serum LH surge. When r-hCG was administered concomitantly with a serum LH surge, this benefit was amplified. The effect appears to be of particular importance in r-FSH-medicated cycles.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>316</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>323</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Evan</Name>
<MidName>E</MidName>
<Family>Taerk</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>etaerk@onefertility.com</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Edward</Name>
<MidName>E</MidName>
<Family>Hughes</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Cassandra</Name>
<MidName>C</MidName>
<Family>Greenberg</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Michael</Name>
<MidName>M</MidName>
<Family>Neal</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Shilpa</Name>
<MidName>S</MidName>
<Family>Amin</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Mehrnoosh</Name>
<MidName>F</MidName>
<Family>Faghih</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Megan</Name>
<MidName>M</MidName>
<Family>Karnis</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>Canada</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>hCG</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Infertility</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Intra uterine insemination</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>LH surge</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Subfertility</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>716.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Hughes EG. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(9):1865-72.##Federman CA, Dumesic DA, Boone WR, Shapiro SS. Relative efficiency of therapeutic donor insemination using a luteinizing hormone monitor. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(3):489-92.##Curie-Cohen M, Luttrell L, Shapiro S. Current practice of artificial insemination by donor in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1979;300(11):585-90.##Martinez AR, Bernadus RE, Voorhorst FJ, Vermeiden JP, Schoemaker J. A controlled study of human chorionic gonadotrophin induced ovulation versus urinary luteinizing hormone surge for timing of intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(9):1247-51.##Deaton JL, Clark RR, Pittaway DE, Herbst P, Bauguess P. Clomiphene citrate ovulation induction in combination with a timed intrauterine insemination: the value of urinary luteinizing hormone versus human chorionic gonadotropin timing. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(1):43-7.##Fuh KW, Wang X, Tai A, Wong I, Norman RJ. Intrauterine insemination: effect of the temporal relationship between the luteinizing hormone surge, human chorionic gonadotrophin administration and insemination on pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(10):2162-6.##Garcia-Velasco JA, Arici A, Zreik TG. Endogenous LH surge detection versus administration of HCG to correctly time intrauterine insemination: which provides a better pregnancy rate? Hum Reprod. 2000;15(4):975-6.##Zreik TG, Garc&#237;a-Velasco JA, Habboosh MS, Olive DL, Arici A. Prospective, randomized, crossover study to evaluate the benefit of human chorionic gonadotropin-timed versus urinary luteinizing hormone-timed intrauterine inseminations in clomiphene citrate-stimulated treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(6):1070-4.##Mitwally MF, Abdel-Razeq S, Casper RF. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with high pregnancy rates during ovarian stimulation and timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2:55.##Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Grimbizis GF, Theodoridis TD, Camus M, et al. Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(3):278-83.##Allen NC, Herbert CM 3rd, Maxson WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP, Wentz AC. Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril. 1985;44(5):569-80.##Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol-17 beta, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone. I. Probit analysis. World Health Organization, Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138(4):383-90.##Testart J, Frydman R. Minimum time lapse between luteinizing hormone surge or human chorionic gonadotropin administration and follicular rupture. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(1):50-3.##Cantineau AE, Janssen MJ, Cohlen BJ. Synchronised approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(4):CD006942.##Fluhr H, Carli S, Deperschmidt M, Wallwiener D, Zygmunt M, Licht P. Differential effects of human chorionic gonadotropin and decidualization on insulin-like growth factors-I and -II in human endometrial stromal cells. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4 Suppl):1384-9.##Farhi J, Orvieto R, Gavish O, Homburg R. The association between follicular size on human chorionic gonadotropin day and pregnancy rate in clomiphene citrate treated polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26(7):546-8.##Shalom-Paz E, Marzal A, Wiser A, Hyman J, Tulandi T. Does optimal follicular size in IUI cycles vary between clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophins treatments? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(2):107-10.##Arici A, Carr BR, Byrd W. Comparison of two LH monitoring methods in women undergoing intrauterine insemination. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of The American Fertility Society. San Antonio, TX. November 2-5, 1992:S70.##Irons DW, Singh M. Evaluation of transvaginal sonography combined with a urinary luteinizing hormone monitor in timing donor insemination. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(10):1859-62.##Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, Scheffer G, van Kooij RJ, Maria de Brouwer CP, van Zonneveld P. The pattern of the luteinizing hormone surge in spontaneous cycles is related to the probability of conception. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(3):413-7.##Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2000;55:101-8.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Value of &quot;Three Dimensional Multidetector CT Hysterosalpingography&quot; in  Infertile Patients with Non-Contributory Hysterosalpingography: A Prospective Study</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>707</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: Infertility is a common health problem requiring imaging to delineate the anatomical causes in women. Three dimensional multi-detector computed tomography hysterosalpingography (3D-MDCT-HSG) offers an easy workup for uterine, tubal and peritoneal factors.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: To present the spectrum of uterine, tubal and peritoneal factors on 3D- MDCT-HSG and determine its diagnostic accuracy for female factor infertility, a prospective study was conducted on 25 infertile women with non-diagnostic HSG from November 2012 to March 2014. Sixty four slice MDCT acquired the scan during pre-ovulatory phase by contrast instillation into uterine cavity. A blinded reviewer interpreted the 3D-MDCT-HSG and results were compared with final diagnosis made on hystero-laproscopy in 22 patients. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-MDCT-HSG for various factors was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: MDCT-HSG demonstrated definite findings in 96% of patients having non-diagnostic HSG. In this study, tubal, uterine and peritoneal abnormalities were present in 68.75%, 56% and 32% of cases, respectively. 48 tubes in 25 patients were evaluated of which 22 tubes were blocked constituting the commonest finding present in 15 (60%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for uterine factors was 83.33% ,100%, 100% and 96.84%, respectively, for tubal factors 93.55%, 94.68%, 85.29% and 96.83%, respectively and for peritoneal factors 62.5%, 92%, 71.43% and 88.46%, respectively. Mean effective radiation dose was 1.76&#177;0.18 &lt;em&gt;mSv&lt;/em&gt; in MDCT-HSG.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: 3D-MDCT-HSG can detect various factors responsible for female infertility especially tubal and uterine; in cases where HSG fails to clearly delineate the pathology.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>323</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>333</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Shuchi</Name>
<MidName>S</MidName>
<Family>Bhatt</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Radio-Diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi University</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Radio-Diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi University</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>drshuchi@hotmail.com</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Murtaza</Name>
<MidName>M</MidName>
<Family>Sumbul</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Radio-Diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi University</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Radio-Diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi University</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Rajpal</Name>
<MidName>R</MidName>
<Family>Rajpal</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Department of Radio-Diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi University</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Department of Radio-Diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi University</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Gita</Name>
<MidName>G</MidName>
<Family>Radhakrishnan</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>Female factor</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Hystero-laparoscopy</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Hysterosalpangiography</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Infertility</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Multidetector CT</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>707.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Rutstein SO, Shah IH. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization; 2004 Sept. 74 p. Report No.: DHS Comparative Reports No 9.##Irvine DS. Epidemiology and aetiology of male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1998;13 Suppl 1:33-44.##Steinkeler JA, Woodfield CA, Lazarus E, Hillstrom MM. Female infertility: a systematic approach to radiologic imaging and diagnosis. Radiographics. 2009;29(5):1353-70.##Shalev J, Meizner I, Bar-Hava I, Dicker D, Mashiach R, Ben-Rafael Z. Predictive value of transvaginal sonography performed before routine diagnostic hysteroscopy for evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):412-7.##Ragni G, Diaferia D, Vegetti W, Colombo M, Arnoldi M, Crosignani PG. Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up: a comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59(4):184-8.##Alborzi S, Dehbashi S, Khodaee R. Sonohysterosalpingographic screening for infertile patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;82(1):57-62.##Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, Kitagaki H, Sugimura K. MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics. 2003;23(6):1401-21.##Saunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2171-9.##Rastogi R. Role of imaging in female infertility [Dr. K.M. Rai Memorial Oration Award]. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010;20(3):168-73.##Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden M, Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(3):486-91.##Sulak PJ, Letterie GS, Coddington CC, Woodward JE, Klein TA. Histology of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1987;48(3):437-40.##Carrascosa P, Capu&#241;ay C, Baronio M, Mart&#237;n L&#243;pez E, Vallejos J, Borghi M, et al. 64-Row multidetector CT virtual hysterosalpingography. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34(1):121-33.##Carrascosa PM, Capu&#241;ay C, Vallejos J, Mart&#237;n L&#243;pez EB, Baronio M, Carrascosa JM. Virtual hysterosalpingography: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive system. Radiographics. 2010;30(3):643-61.##Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(5):1029-34.##Afzali N, Ahmadi F, Akhbari F. Various hysterosalpingography findings of female genital tuberculosis: A case series. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(6):519-24.##Valentini AL, Muzii L, Marana R, Catalano GF, Summaria V, Felici F, et al. Improvement of hysterosalpingographic accuracy in the diagnosis of peritubal adhesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(4):1173-6.##Patil M. Assessing tubal damage. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009;2(1):2-11.##Carrascosa P, Baronio M, Capu&#241;ay C, L&#243;pez EM, Sueldo C, Papier S. Clinical use of 64-row multislice computed tomography hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of female factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1953-8.##Zanetti E, Ferrari LR, Rossi G. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysterosalpingographic study. Br J Radiol. 1978;51(603):161-70.##Salim R, Regan L, Woelfer B, Backos M, Jurkovic D. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(1):162-6.##Shaaban MM, Awwad IM, Al Beblawy MM, Khalil TH. Comparison between multidetector computed tomography and hysterosalpingography in assessment of infertile couples. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2013;18(3):191-5.##Karasick S, Goldfarb AF. Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: diagnosis with hysterosalpingography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152(4):777-9.##Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Grammatikakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Gourtsoyiannis N. Radiogenic risks from hysterosalpingography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(7):1522-8.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Pregnancy Luteoma in Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>719</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Background: Pregnancy luteoma is a rare non neoplastic condition of the ovary. It is usually asymptomatic and found incidentally during imaging in pregnancy or during cesarean section. Pregnancy luteoma can also occur after ectopic pregnancy.&lt;br /&gt;
Case Presentation: A 30 year old female presented to G.B. Pant Hospital, Andaman and Nicobar Islands institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair in October 2015 with abdominal pain. After initial investigations, exploratory laporotomy was done for ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Enlarged ovary was removed along with the ruptured portion of fallopian tube. Histopathological examination revealed solid aggregates of large cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm; diagnosis of pregnancy luteoma was given.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: It must be considered in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses in pregnant females that early diagnosis of this entity may avoid unnecessary radical surgery.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>333</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>336</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Rupinder</Name>
<MidName>RK</MidName>
<Family>Brar</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>drrupinderbrar@gmail. com</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Jyotsna</Name>
<MidName>JN</MidName>
<Family>Bharti</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Jitendra</Name>
<MidName>JS</MidName>
<Family>Nigam</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Sahil</Name>
<MidName>S</MidName>
<Family>Sehgal</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Hena</Name>
<MidName>HS</MidName>
<Family>Singh</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Dayanand Medical College and Hospital</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Dayanand Medical College and Hospital</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Pushpanjali</Name>
<MidName>P</MidName>
<Family>Ojha</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Andaman and Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>Ectopic pregnancy</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Ovarian masses</KeyText></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><KeyText>Pregnancy luteoma</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>719.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Irving JA, Clement PB, editors. Nonneoplastic lesions of the ovary. USA: Springer US; 2010. 1203 p. (Kurman RJ, Hedrick Ellenson L, Ronnett BM, editors. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital tract; vol 1).##Rosai J. Rosai and Akerman’s surgical pathology. 10th ed. New York: Elsevier; 2011. p. 1555-60.##Lalwani N, Patel S, Ha KY, Shanbhogue AK, Nagar AM, Chintapalli KN, et al. Miscellaneous tumour-like lesions of the ovary: cross-sectional imaging review. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1013):477-86.##Young RH, Dudley AG, Scully RE. Granulosa cell, Sertoli-Leydig cell, and unclassified sex cord-stromal tumors associated with pregnancy: a clinicopathological analysis of thirty-six cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1984;18(2):181-205.##Honor&#233; LH, O&#39;Hara KE. Incidental pregnancy luteoma associated with ectopic tubo-ovarian pregnancy: evidence in favor of origin from theca interna of an atretic follicle. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1978;8(1):15-9.##Spitzer RF, Wherrett D, Chitayat D, Colgan T, Dodge JE, Salle JL, et al. Maternal luteoma of pregnancy presenting with virilization of the female infant. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(10):835-40.##Mazza V, Di Monte I, Ceccarelli PL, Rivasi F, Falcinelli C, Forabosco A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of female pseudohermaphroditism associated with bilateral luteoma of pregnancy: case report. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):821-4.##Kumar RV, Ranjan DS, Rao BR, Rao ES. Maternal luteoma of pregnancy: a rare case report. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci. 2014;3(4):267-9.##Nanda A, Gokhale UA, Pillai GR. Bilateral pregnancy luteoma: a case report. Oman Med J. 2014;29(5):371-2.##Masarie K, Katz V, Balderston K. Pregnancy luteomas: clinical presentations and management strategies. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65(9):575-82.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

<ARTICLE>
    <TitleF></TitleF>
    <TitleE>Environmental Impact on Reproductive Health: Can Biomarkers Offer Any Help?</TitleE>
    <TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
    <ABSTRACTS>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>1</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>709</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
        <ABSTRACT>
            <Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
            <CONTENT>&lt;p&gt;Environmental health is broadly defined as the aspects of human health determined by physical, chemical, biological and social factors in the environment and encompasses the assessment and control of those factors. The exogenous and endogenous environmental health determinants include all that surround us, and environmental impact includes not only physical, chemical and biological factors, but also hormones, diet and lifestyle. As most humans develop in a predictable fashion, growing from a fertilized egg to fetus, newborn, toddler, child, adolescent, and adult, there is little doubt that environment is a powerful modifier of the human reproduction and development (1). Starting 20 years ago, there has been a steady growth in the number of laboratories involved in the investigation on environmental impact on molecular reprogramming during the most critical windows of development, such as pre-conception, pre-implantation, the fetal period, and early childhood. And considerable evidence demonstrates that the gene-environmental regulation of gene expression is crucial, besides change in the DNA sequence (1, 2). The epigenetic information is often stored as chemical modifications falling into two main categories: 1- DNA methylation and 2- changes to the histone proteins that package the genome. By regulating DNA accessibility and chromatin structure, these chemical alterations influence how the genome is translated across diverse developmental stages (3). Untangling all the components of gene-environmental regulation might be problematic in conventional human setting. In this broadest sense, if contributions of multiple factors are substantial and likely to increase susceptibility to reproductive ailments, the effects of these should be apparent in the &quot;normal&quot; tissue prior to the development of disease. As the examination of the role of gene-environmental regulation in the developmental re-programming in humans’ remains relatively new, it is unlikely that a single approach will stand out as being more valuable or appropriate to address a potential mechanistic link (2, 3). Therefore, to yield provocative insights, cutting-edge platform technologies must be employed for studying the gene-environmental interactions in complex reproductive tract ailments that include early or delayed puberty, menstrual irregularities, infertility, sub-fertility, early pregnancy loss, fetal death, impaired fetal growth, low birth weight, premature birth, structural or functional birth defects, polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, reproductive tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and reproductive tract cancers. Given that developmental basis is apparently linked to adult disease outcome, there is a greater need to change our focus from treating diseases after they are detected to prevention and from risk assessment to early disease diagnosis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Environmental stress-induced deformities-evidence from human studies:&lt;/em&gt; A differentiating tissue that is actively proliferating to generate additional cells will respond differently to an insult as compared to a tissue than a fully differentiated tissue that has already generated many of the required cells after molecular reprogramming. Evidence from both epidemiological and mechanistic studies has not only established a potential link of environmental pollutants with impaired human fertility, but also shown that they possess the ability to alter placental function and hamper fetal development. While some of these pollutants act as an endocrine disruptor, others activate a cascade of events which significantly disturbs the intact reproductive system (4). A wide range of female reproductive tract disorders like polycystic ovarian syndrome (5), placental abnormalities and aneuploidy (6) are reported to be closely associated with the environmental chemicals results. Available reports also indicate that exposure of pregnant women to air pollutants results in increased risk of different abnormalities specifically related to heart, brain and lungs. Air pollution affects the normal developmental mechanisms of fetal brain and is related to the different diseases of the central nervous system (7). The expression of two vital genes, brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) and syndecan-1 (SYN1), required for normal fetal brain development decreases significantly with the increasing particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) exposure&lt;em&gt; in utero&lt;/em&gt; (8). In addition, pre-natal toxic exposure interferes with fetal lung development and is associated with the higher risk of developing pulmonary disorders including asthma (9). Breton et al. demonstrated that prenatal exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 is associated with the increased carotid arterial stiffness (10). Interestingly, exposed mothers are at higher risk of giving birth to low weight babies (11). In addition to the developmental artefacts, environmental stress signals can insinuate activation of ion channels, trigger pro-inflammatory cytokine response, induce oxidative stress, and affect cellular proliferation and differentiation orchestrating myriad abnormal changes which are transferred to the daughter progenitor cells. Links between pre-conceptual, peri-conceptual, and prenatal toxic exposure with adult onset of non-communicable diseases such as obesity, auto-immunity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, cancers, neuro-degenerative and mental sickness suggests that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and micro-RNA expression might be intricately involved, however, a thorough validation in human tissue samples remains sparse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Biomarkers: ray of hope?: &lt;/em&gt;Much of the excitement surrounding biomarkers today relates to identification of an ongoing change (genetic/epigenetic) and early disease diagnosis. For example, measuring appropriate biomarker in paternal blood and semen samples may provide early clues for well-timed and proper intervention. As significant amount of maternal chemical burden is shared with the developing fetus and infants, sampling of maternal blood or urine samples at different times of pregnancy allows an evaluation of the exposure of the fetus at different times of development, elucidating the chemicals that cross the placenta. A biomarker in clinical reproductive medicine may be useful to better understand and predict ovarian reserve, gamete quality, embryo viability and euploidy, as well as endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and obstetric complications, &lt;em&gt;e.g.&lt;/em&gt; pre-eclampsia or preterm labor. Also, for effective management of&lt;em&gt; in vitro&lt;/em&gt; fertilization (IVF) protocols, specific biomarkers could be used to discriminate between suitable and unsuitable embryos to be transferred. Some of the widely assessed biomarkers like serum progesterone, hCG and estrogen not only help to identify viable pregnancies but also provide crucial functional information about the disorders that affect testes, ovaries or adrenal glands. Similarly inhibin A is suggested to be beneficial in identification of ectopic pregnancies (12). Other proteins like CRP, placenta growth factor, fms-like tyrosine kinase-1(s-1FLT), leptin, transforming growth factor-a1 and plasminogen activator inhibitor may act as predictive biomarkers for different disorders including pre-eclampsia (13). Yet, these biomarkers have limited clinical exploitation due to poor sensitivity and specificity of the available methods for their detection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Innovative strategies: &lt;/em&gt;Several thousands of environmental contaminants penetrate daily into our environment and exert various kinds of stress response on reproductive health (2). Included in the mixture of exposures are the billions of naturally occurring and man-made chemicals (&lt;em&gt;e.g.&lt;/em&gt;, heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, &lt;em&gt;etc&lt;/em&gt;.); physical agents such as noise, vibration, temperature, &lt;em&gt;etc&lt;/em&gt;.; macro level factors like population density, sanitation, etc.; and a spectrum of lifestyle factors that includes diet, physical activity and sleep. Assessment of cumulative risks for any given biological end-point will involve analysis, characterization, and possible quantification of the combined risks from multiple environmental stressors. When a pollutant enters our body, it either accumulates, or is processed metabolically and excreted. For real-time monitoring, it could be the concentration of the parental compound, its metabolite or conjugated derivative with endogenous molecules via enzymatically catalyzed transformations which can be studied using mass spectroscopy techniques. On the other hand, for understanding the molecular repercussion of the exposure the mainstay of research will have to be on a combined &quot;omics-based approach&quot; involving bio-molecules such as DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites. Large scale quantification of genes coding for proteins, regulatory elements and non-coding sequences (genomics), RNA and gene expression (transcriptomics), protein expression (proteomics), metabolites and metabolic pathways (metabolomics) will enable the identification of important genes, pathways, and protein expression signatures in suitable biological matrix of sizeable cohorts of men and women (2). Previous &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;in vivo&lt;/em&gt; studies have shown that environmental exposure results in the altered metabolic profile, is vital for xenobiotic clearance thereby exposing individuals and upcoming offspring to an increased risk of different disorders including type 1 and type 2 diabetes (14). Significant changes in the chromosomal region 11p15 are reported to be associated with Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome, fetal over growth, or Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) under growth (15). It also disturbs epigenetic mechanism which includes DNA methylation, histone modifications, and mirco RNAs (miRNAs). Earlier studies have also reported that the altered methylation of guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) subunit alpha isoforms short (GNASAS) and insulin (INS) is associated with the increased risk of developing coronary heart disease (16). Exposure to tobacco smoke was reported to be significantly associated with the increasing miR-223 levels in both maternal and cord blood which further co-related with the rising cotinine concentrations in maternal urine (17). Similarly, a significant down-regulation of miR-146a was observed after nicotine and benzopyrene exposure further signifying the utility of epigenetic profile in assessing exposure associated dysregulations (18). Converging lines of evidence support the possibility that epigenetics may be a causal link between the genotype and environment, and hence, between the phenotype and disease which further substantiates that the changes incurred during &lt;em&gt;in utero&lt;/em&gt; development can be transmitted trans-generationally. Recent advances in high-throughput methylated DNA analysis through whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and RNA-Seq, epigenome-wide association studies, epigenome editing approaches are more likely to provide novel insights to developmental origins of adult diseases (2). Although the cost of these technologies might be substantially high for large-scale application at the moment, these techniques can be used for more niche questions on limited samples to gain biological insight for further exploration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Risk prediction, early detection and prevention:&lt;/em&gt; Because of diversities in chemical nature, dose- response relationship and factors associated with susceptibility and vulnerability, design of risk assessment strategy is challenging (19). It is very likely that low and relatively innocuous concentration of contaminants often produce deleterious and reproductive health effect, which are hard to be predicted, because measurable effects are expressed only after prolonged exposure. When these incipient effects are expressed, it might be too late to take corrective actions or steps to reduce risk. Therefore, it is essential to develop biomarkers that convincingly reflect adverse exposure-response relationship. Novel biomarkers might offer vital clues for environmental-associated reproductive system diseases and thus facilitate (i) early diagnosis of a disease; (ii) recurrence or progression of a disease; (iii) identification of individuals for disease prevention; (iv) as a potential target for drugs; (v) as a marker for a drug response. Delineating the molecular signatures of environmental-associated reproductive illness requires comprehensive knowledge of the entire cascade of events from the release of an environmental contaminant through absorption, actions and damage within the body and the development of disease (20). Defining the extent and impact of exposure is a central element for understanding a complex disease form. While ascertaining the possible implication of any exogenous moiety, the precise amount that is available (internal dose) after it is absorbed via ingestion, inhalation,&lt;em&gt; in utero&lt;/em&gt;, and dermal routes is only physiologically relevant. Once inside the body, the entity is transformed and either stored or eliminated, traversing through various metabolic pathways (2). Therefore, before validating a biomarker associated with any kind of environmental exposure (acute/chronic/occupational), it is necessary to discern where in this chemico-biological process the measured index comes from - that is whether it is a biomarker of exposure, susceptibility or effect? A potential biomarker can facilitate better identification of exposure, measure both susceptibility and vulnerability, and increase prediction of outcome. The scientific impact of development and validation of biomarkers in environmental-associated reproductive system diseases is highly significant as it opens the road to the exploitation, using modern-omics technologies, of thousands of biological matrices currently housed in existing bio-banks of several medical institutes. Bodily fluids have emerged as an important source of information in several acute and chronic environmentally associated pathologies (20). A number of investigators have attempted to use circulating bio-entities found in plasma, saliva, urine, milk, seminal plasma, tears, and amniotic fluid as disease biomarkers for reproductive tract ailments. These circulating entities capable of predicting the disease course include high molecular weight complexes, membrane fragments, extracellular vesicles, lipid rafts, exosomes, microvesicles, DNA, non-coding RNA and proteins. Detection of these novel entities in plasma or serum can act as a &quot;liquid biopsy&quot;, which can be useful for a number of biomarker applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Clinical translation:&lt;/em&gt; While identifying and characterizing the significant consequences of these associated factors on human reproduction and development, two defined clusters of population might be the most affected: (i) susceptible and; (2) vulnerable populations. Whereas, &quot;susceptibility&quot; refers to inherent biological factors, &quot;vulnerability&quot; indicates population at higher risk due to personal factors. Population with both susceptibility and vulnerability may together be referred as &quot;sensitive&quot; population. How environmental exposures affect reproductive function and development, and how this knowledge can be translated to reduce associated morbidities and enhance quality of life is precisely warranted. Recently, a large number of environmental and host risk factors have been identified that are associated with reproductive health risk resulting in dramatic fold increase in number of biomarkers reaching for clinical validation. However, the translation of these for use in the population-level screening in such a way as to have a significant impact on clinical practice poses a major challenge. Often the use of a predictive biomarker has poorer test characteristics when it is validated in two separate populations. If validated in a low disease prevalence setting, the predictive value may be low; on the other hand, in high disease prevalence setting, the same biomarker could have enough potential clinical utility. Therefore, the process of identification and validation for clinical application among the large number of purported biomarkers associated with environmental illness is a critical step in the translation process. Key to this process is to understand the differences between evaluating biomarkers and risk factors for prevention versus disease risk prediction and early detection. A robust indulgence in analysing these differences will be necessary to facilitate the translational process. The challenges are enormous but a cutting-edge tailored approach may help to set priorities for future reproductive health research, monitoring, and surveillance activities and for potential risk assessment or risk management follow-up efforts. Such strategies might pave the way to further understand the etiologic processes underlying the exposure-outcome relationship and offer possibilities for risk prediction, early detection and prevention.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Acknowledgement&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The authors are thankful to the Department of Science &amp; Technology, Department of Biotechnology, Council of Scientiﬁc and Industrial Research, and the University Grants Commission, Government of India, New Delhi for providing necessary funding assistance to the laboratory of Prof. Pradyumna Kumar Mishra.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conflict of Interest&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The authors report no conflicts of interest.&lt;/p&gt;</CONTENT>
        </ABSTRACT>
    </ABSTRACTS>
    <PAGES>
        <PAGE>
            <FPAGE>336</FPAGE>
            <TPAGE>341</TPAGE>
        </PAGE>
    </PAGES>
    <AUTHORS>
        <AUTHOR>
<Name>Arpit</Name>
<MidName>A</MidName>
<Family>Bhargava</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Neelam</Name>
<MidName>N</MidName>
<Family>Pathak</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Radhey</Name>
<MidName>RS</MidName>
<Family>Sharma</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Division of Reproductive Biology, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Division of Reproductive Biology, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Nirmal</Name>
<MidName>NK</MidName>
<Family>Lohiya</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>Centre for Advanced Studies in Zoology, University of Rajasthan</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>Centre for Advanced Studies in Zoology, University of Rajasthan</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email></Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>
<Name>Pradyumna</Name>
<MidName>PK</MidName>
<Family>Mishra</Family>
<NameE></NameE>
<MidNameE></MidNameE>
<FamilyE></FamilyE>
<Organizations>
<Organization>School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University</Organization>
</Organizations>
<Universities>
<University>School of Biological Sciences, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University</University>
</Universities>
<Countries>
<Country>India</Country>
</Countries>
<EMAILS>
<Email>pkm_8bh@yahoo.co.uk</Email>
</EMAILS>
</AUTHOR>
    </AUTHORS>
    <KEYWORDS>
        <KEYWORD><KeyText>No Keyword</KeyText></KEYWORD>
    </KEYWORDS>
    <PDFFileName>709.pdf</PDFFileName>
    <REFRENCES>
        <REFRENCE>
            <REF>Mishra PK, Dabadghao S, Modi GK, Desikan P, Jain A, Mittra I, et al. In utero exposure to methyl isocyanate in the Bhopal gas disaster: evidence of persisting hyperactivation of immune system two decades later. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(4):279.##Bunkar N, Pathak N, Lohiya NK, Mishra PK. Epigenetics: A key paradigm in reproductive health. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43(2):59-81.##Mishra PK. A pragmatic &amp; translational approach of human biomonitoring to methyl isocyanate exposure in Bhopal. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(4):479-84.##Caserta D, Di Segni N, Mallozzi M, Giovanale V, Mantovani A, Marci R, et al. Bisphenol A and the female reproductive tract: an overview of recent laboratory evidence and epidemiological studies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:37.##Takeuchi T, Tsutsumi O, Ikezuki Y, Kamei Y, Osuga Y, Fujiwara T, et al. Elevated serum bisphenol A levels under hyperandrogenic conditions may be caused by decreased UDP-glucuronosyl transferase activity. Endocr J. 2006;53(4):485-91.##Taylor TH, Gitlin SA, Patrick JL, Crain JL, Wilson JM, Griffin DK. The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):571-81.##Block ML, Calder&#243;n-Garcidue&#241;as L. Air pollution: mechanisms of neuroinflammation and CNS disease. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(9):506-16.##Saenen ND, Plusquin M, Bijnens E, Janssen BG, Gyselaers W, Cox B, et al. In utero fine particle air pollution and placental expression of genes in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling pathway: An environage birth cohort study. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(8):834-40.##Heederik D, von Mutius E. Does diversity of environmental microbial exposure matter for the occurrence of allergy and asthma? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(1):44-50.##Breton CV, Byun HM, Wang X, Salam MT, Siegmund K, Gilliland FD. DNA methylation in the arginase-nitric oxide synthase pathway is associated with exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(2):191-7.##Habermann M, Gouveia N. Socioeconomic position and low birth weight among mothers exposed to traffic-related air pollution. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113900.##Cole LA, Kardana A, Seifer DB, Bohler HC Jr. Urine hCG beta-subunit core fragment, a sensitive test for ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(2):497-9.##Belo L, Santos-Silva A, Rumley A, Lowe G, Pereira-Leite L, Quintanilha A, et al. Elevated tissue plasminogen activator as a potential marker of endothelial dysfunction in pre-eclampsia: correlation with proteinuria. BJOG. 2002;109(11):1250-5.##Wallace C, Smyth DJ, Maisuria-Armer M, Walker NM, Todd JA, Clayton DG. The imprinted DLK1-MEG3 gene region on chromosome 14q32.2 alters susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):68-71.##Choufani S, Shuman C, Weksberg R. Molecular findings in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163C(2):131-40.##Talens RP, Jukema JW, Trompet S, Kremer D, Westendorp RG, Lumey LH, et al. Hypermethylation at loci sensitive to the prenatal environment is associated with increased incidence of myocardial infarction. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):106-15.##Herberth G, Bauer M, Gasch M, Hinz D, R&#246;der S, Olek S, et al. Maternal and cord blood miR-223 expression associates with prenatal tobacco smoke exposure and low regulatory T-cell numbers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(2):543-50.##Maccani MA, Avissar-Whiting M, Banister CE, McGonnigal B, Padbury JF, Marsit CJ. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with downregulation of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-146a in the placenta. Epigenetics. 2010;5(7):583-9.##Mishra PK, Bunkar N, Raghuram GV, Khare NK, Pathak N, Bhargava A. Epigenetic dimension of oxygen radical injury in spermatogonial epithelial cells. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;52:40-56.##Bhargava A, Khare NK, Bunkar N, Chaudhury K, Pandey KC, Jain SK, et al. Cell-free circulating epigenomic signatures: Non-invasive biomarker for cardiovascular and other age-related chronic diseases. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(8):1175-87.##</REF>
        </REFRENCE>
    </REFRENCES>
</ARTICLE>

    </ARTICLES>
  </JOURNAL>
</XML>
