

<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">

<article xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Reprod Infert</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">arij001</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Reproduction &amp; Infertility</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2228-5482</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2251-676X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Avicenna Research Institute</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jri30046</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi"></article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="pmid"></article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
             <subject></subject> 
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
            <subject></subject>
        </subj-group> 
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effect of Artificial Oocyte Activation on Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes in Patients with Lower Percentage of Sperm Containing Phospholipase Cζ: A Randomized Clinical Trial</article-title>
      </title-group>
        <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nazarian</surname><given-names>Hamid</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Azad</surname><given-names>Nahid</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff><aff>Department of Reproductive Biology, School of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nazari</surname><given-names>Leila</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Piryaei</surname><given-names>Abbas</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff><aff>Urogenital Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Heidari</surname><given-names>Mohammad Hassan</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Masteri Farahani</surname><given-names>Reza</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Karimi</surname><given-names>Maryam</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ghaffari Novin</surname><given-names>Marefat</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</aff></contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <day></day>
        <month></month>
        <year></year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day></day>
        <month></month>
        <year></year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>03</fpage>
      <lpage>10</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>28</day>
          <month>9</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>24</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <abstract>
      <p>
      &lt;p&gt;Background: Artificial oocyte activation (AOA) is a specialized method in assisted reproductive technique (ART). According to increasing concern about using AOA, it is necessary to evaluate sperm-borne oocyte activating factors (SOAFs) including phospholipase C zeta (PLC&amp;zeta;). In this study, PLC&amp;zeta; before AOA was evaluated first and then the impact of AOA on pre-implantation embryo development was investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: This prospective clinical trial enrolled couples subjected to ICSI. By evaluating PLC&amp;zeta;, semen samples were categorized into two groups; I (Control) and II (PLC&amp;zeta; deficient). Retrieved oocytes from partners were put into three categories: control group (Injected with sperm from group I, n=113), group without AOA (Injected with sperm from group II and no exposure to AOA, n=106), and group AOA (Injected with sperm from group II and exposure to AOA, n=114). Finally, fertilization results were compared via Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn&amp;rsquo;s multiple comparison test. The p&amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: Fertilization rate was significantly lower in the group without AOA compared to control group (41.9&amp;plusmn;6.3 &lt;em&gt;vs.&lt;/em&gt; 78.1&amp;plusmn;4.7, p&amp;lt;0.001). AOA improved fertilization rate in group AOA compared to the group without AOA (69.5&amp;plusmn;3.9 &lt;em&gt;vs.&lt;/em&gt; 41.9&amp;plusmn;6.3, p&amp;lt;0.01); however, cleavage (91.7&amp;plusmn;2.8, 90.9&amp;plusmn;4.6, and 95.2&amp;plusmn;3.4, respectively) and embryo quality (2.5&amp;plusmn;0.1, 2.3&amp;plusmn;0.2, and 2.4&amp;plusmn;0.2, respectively) scores were not substantially different between groups of control, with and without AOA.&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: We showed that PLC&amp;zeta; can be considered as a good biomarker in evaluation of oocyte activation capability. Further studies are required to establish the best use of PLC&amp;zeta; as a biomarker in clinics.&lt;/p&gt;

      </p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>

    
</article>

