This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
Background
Recurrent miscarriage is a major concern in the couples with reproductive problems. The chromosomal abnormalities, mainly balanced rearrangements are reported in variable phenotypes and the prevalence of them is 2-8% in such couples.
Case Presentation
In this study, the clinical, cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic evaluations were performed on a couple with RM. The cytogenetic analysis of the husband revealed a balanced reciprocal translocation of t(18;22)(q21.1;q12) whereas wife had a normal karyotype of 46,XX. Further spectral karyotyping was performed to rule out the involvement of any other chromosomal aberrations present in the genome. Additional whole chromosome paint FISH (Fluorescence in situ hybridization) with paint probes 18 and 22 confirmed the translocation.
Conclusion
To our knowledge, this is the first report of a novel (18;22) translocation with unique breakpoints and their association with RM. The reciprocal translocations provide a good opportunity for the identification of disease associated genes. However, in recurrent miscarriages, most of them do not disrupt any gene at the breakpoint but can lead to unbalanced gametes and hence poor reproductive outcome like RM or birth of a child with malformations and intellectual disability. The translocation breakpoints might be risk factors for RM. Moreover, the impact of the balanced translocations in association with RM is discussed in this report.
To cite this article: Dutta UR, Ponnala R, Dalal A. A Novel de novo Balanced Reciprocal Translocation t(18;22) Associated with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case Report. J Reprod Infertil. 2014;15(2):113-116.
Introduction
Arecurrent miscarriage (RM) is defined as a condition of three or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 24 weeks of gestation (1). The etiology is unknown in 50% of the cases. The causes of RM are parental chromosomal abnormalities, uterine anomalies, endocrine dysfunction, autoimmune disorders, maternal and paternal age, infectious diseases, environmental toxins, etc. Among the various etiologies, genetic factors appear to be highly associated with reproductive loss (2).
Balanced chromosomal rearrangements are the most frequent genetic abnormalities in humans; an estimated 0.5% of the population carries a balanced translocation or inversion (3). These balanced rearrangements are common in couples with reproductive disorders (4). There is a 15-20% chance of all pregnancies ending up in RM and 70% of them represent the chromosomal abnormalities. Parental chromosomal abnormalities also represent an important etiology of RM with a prevalence of 2-8% (5). Due to malsegregation during meiosis, unbalanced gametes can be produced. The unbalanced distribution of the chromosomes involved in the translocation, leads to partial trisomy for one chromosome and partial monosomy for the other chromosome (6). The severity of the phenotype depends on the chromosomes involved and the position of the breakpoint regions. The clinical consequences of such imbalances are usually lethal to the developing embryo leading to spontaneous miscarriages or early neonatal deaths (7). Since there is the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent miscarriages, it is important for the clinicians to suggest cytogenetic analysis in such couples. This eventually helps to know the existence of any rearrangements as well as also increase the know-ledge of the recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in a given population.
Although there are few reports in literature involving translocation (18;22), they are mostly associated with lymphomas. For example, B-cell lymphomas with a t(18;22)(q21;q11) (8) and a t(18;22) in a case of lymphocytic lymphoma are the typical ones (9). But to our knowledge, there are no reports showing t(18;22) associated with RM.
We report here on the clinical cytogenetic and Molecular cytogenetic finding in a patient with t(18;22). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report with t(18;22) showing the unique breakpoints associated with RM.
Case Presentation
A non-consanguineous couple, wife (29 years) and husband (33 years), were referred to our genetic clinic with poor reproductive history evaluation. The wife had three miscarriages, all in her first trimester and one neonatal death. The detailed family history and written consent were taken from the couple. Both the partners were physically and intellectually normal. There was no family history of any other disorders and miscarriages. Other possible factors like infectious diseases, immunological incompetence and anatomical defects in the female reproductive tract were ruled out.
Cytogenetic analyses
Chromosomal analysis was carried out on peripheral blood lymphocytes in both the partners by standard methods. Metaphases were analyzed by G-banding using Trypsin and Giemsa in the couple.
Spectral karyotyping (SKY)
SKY was performed using SKY Paint kit-Human (Applied Spectral Imaging). The denaturation and hybridization of the probe and the target DNA with recommended parameters of time and temperature, final post-hybridization washes and counterstaining with 4′-6-diamidino 2-phenylindole hydrochloride (DAPI) were carried out as per manufacturer's protocol on the patient slide.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis
FISH was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions on the metaphase spreads of the patient by standard procedures. Commercially available whole chromosome paint probes of chromosomes 18 and 22 were used (Kreatech, Netherlands).
Cytogenetic analysis of the GTG banded chromosomes of the husband revealed a karyotype of t(18;22)(q21.1;q12) (Figure 1) whereas wife had a normal female karyotype of 46,XX.
The chromosomes involved in the translocation t(18;22)(q21.1;q12) of the illustrated case. A. The GTG banded karyogram showing the translocation breakpoint regions. B. The partial ideogram showing normal chromosome 18 in red and normal 22 in green and both derivative 18 and derivative 22 in red and green
Confirmation of the chromosomal translocation
Spectral karyotyping (SKY) was performed which showed the balanced reciprocal translocation (BRT) involving only chromosomes 18 and 22. SKY also ruled out the involvement of other chromosomal aberrations present in the genome (Figure 2). Apparently, the balanced translocation was further confirmed by FISH. FISH with whole chromosome paint 18 (red) and paint 22(green) showed normal 18 and 22 chromosomes in red and green colors and both the derivatives 18 and 22 in both red and green (Figure 3). Hence, the refined karyotype according to ISCN 2013 is 46,XY.ish t(18;22)(q21.1;q12)(wcp18+,wcp22 + ; wcp22+,wcp18 + ) (10).
SKY on the lymphocyte metaphase showing the representative karyotypes illustrating the display colours on the left and the classification colours on the right. In the center, there are the DAPI band images
WCP FISH on the metaphase spreads of the proband. The normal chromosome 18 is in red and the normal 22 in green. Derivative 18 and derivative 22 are shown both in red and green
Conclusion
Reciprocal translocation is the most common chromosomal abnormality found in 1 in 500 people (11). These translocations do not show any phenotypic effect in most carriers, but can give rise to reproductive problems, usually RM, chromosomally abnormal offspring or in some cases infertility (12). In this study, a couple with RM was studied. The husband revealed a BRT and the molecular cytogenetic technique like FISH confirmed the translocation and SKY ruled out the involvement of other chromosomal rearrangements.
BRT is ascertained in 68% of phenotypically normal couples because of their reproductive problems (13). They can cause pregnancy loss be-cause segregation during meiosis results in gametes with duplication or deficiency of chromosome segments (14). The severity depends on the chromosomes involved and also the breakpoint regions. When one member of a couple carries a BRT, the risk of having a miscarriage is approximately doubled (15).
In BRT, the translocated chromosomes and their homologues align in a cross shaped structures called quadrivalent during meiosis (16). These quadrivalents segregate with or without recombination, to give gametes with different balanced or unbalanced chromosome complements (17). Likely, there are 32 possible types of meiotic outcomes, out of which only two are genetically balanced; one having normal chromosomes and the other carrying the balanced form of the translocation (12).
Also, in the present study, it was probable that the proper alignment of the homologous chromosomes was not possible due to the reciprocal translocation, thereby resulting in unbalanced gametes. This could be the reason of the three RM in the wife and a neonatal death.
Most likely, pathogenic mechanism behind RM is a multifactorial mode of inheritance. Several causes such as skewed X-chromosome inactivation, genomic imprinting, single gene mutations, chromosomal instability and sperm chromosomal abnormalities have been suggested to explain the reproductive losses (13).
Identification of each case is important as it leads to insights into the mechanisms of the rearrangements and characterization of such rearrangements helps in the identification of the disease involved. In RM cases, the parental chromosomal analysis plays a significant role as the cause of the RM can be understood. When a BRT is identified, the future pregnancies can be monitored by offering prenatal diagnosis. This helps in confirming the balanced and unbalanced state of the offspring. Where available, the products of conception can also be analyzed to confirm the partial trisomy and monosomy of the fetus.
Apparently, precise molecular characterization of BRT could pave the way for the identification of new genes or genes involved in RM and also help in elucidating the molecular mechanism underlying the aberrations. It also establishes the cause of the miscarriage and helps in genetic counseling.
In summary, the problem of the reported case in this study can increase our knowledge about RM. Genetics of RM also helps especially in assisted reproductive procedures. Hence, cytogenetic studies leading to RM still remain an important tool. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of t(18;22) with the unique breakpoints in RM.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by a core grant to the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. URD is grateful to Prof Dr med Evelin Schrock from Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat, Dresden, Germany for kindly providing the training in SKY.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ReferencesRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG)The management of recurrent miscarriage1998LondonRoyal College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSierraSStephensonMGenetics of recurrent pregnancy lossSemin Reprod Med.20062411724JacobsPABrowneCGregsonNJoyceCWhiteHEstimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of bandingJ Med Genet.19922921038FrynsJPVan BuggenhoutGStructural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastageEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.19988121716ElghezalHHidarSMougouSKhairiHSaadAPrevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent miscarriageFertil Steril.20078837213ChaitraPTMaliniSSSharat kumarCAn overview of genetic and molecular factors responsible for recurrent preganancy lossInt J Hum Genet.20111121725RaoLMurthyKBabuAVenkataPDeenadayalMSinghLChromosome inversions and a novel chromosome insertion associated with recurrent miscarriages in South IndiaArch Gynecol Obstet.200527242737LinPJetlyRLennonPAAbruzzoLVPrajapatiSMedeirosLJTranslocation (18;22)(q21;q11) in B-cell lymphoma: a report of 4 cases and review of the literatureHum Pathol.20083911166472SeitePLerouxDHillionJMonteilMBergerRMathieu-MahulDMolecular analysis of a variant 18;22 translocation in a case of lymphocytic lymphomaGenes Chromosomes Cancer.1993613944ShafferLGMcGowan-JordanJSchmidMAn international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature2013Basel, SwitzerlandKarger publicationsHookEBHamertonJLThe frequency of chromosome abnormalities detected in consecutive newborn studies-differences between studies- results by sex and by severity of phenotypic involvementPopulation Cytogenetic1977New YorkAcademic Press66MackieOgilvie CScrivenPNMeiotic outcomes in reciprocal translocation carriers ascertained in 3-day human embryosEur J Hum Genet199810128016DuttaURRajithaPPiduguVKDalalABCytogenetic abnormalities in 1162 couples with recurrent miscarriages in Southern region of India: report and reviewJ Assist Reprod Genet.20112821459BhasinMKFoersterWFuhrmannWA cytogenetic study of recurrent abortionHumangenetik.197318213948MozdaraniHMeybodiAMZari-MoradiSA cytogenetic study of couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions and infertile patients with recurrent IVF/ICSI failureIndian J Hum Genet.200814116AnanthapurVAwariSVeenaKSujathaMJyothyANon-Robertsonian translocation t (2;11) is associated with infertility in an oligospermic manAndrologia.20144644535ScrivenPNHandysideAHOgilvieCMChromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosisPrenata Diagn.19981813143749