

<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">

<article xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Reprod Infert</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">arij001</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Reproduction &amp; Infertility</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2228-5482</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2251-676X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Avicenna Research Institute</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jri60079</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi"></article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="pmid"></article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
             <subject></subject> 
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
            <subject></subject>
        </subj-group> 
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Outcomes of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Single Gene Defects in a Privately Funded Period and Publicly Funded Period: A North-American Single Center Experience</article-title>
      </title-group>
        <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Shaulov</surname><given-names>Talya</given-names></name></contrib><aff>MUHC Reproductive Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name></contrib><aff>MUHC Reproductive Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>Jin-Tae</given-names></name></contrib><aff>MUHC Reproductive Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Son</surname><given-names>Weon-Young</given-names></name></contrib><aff>MUHC Reproductive Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Buckett</surname><given-names>William</given-names></name></contrib><aff>MUHC Reproductive Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ao</surname><given-names>Asangla</given-names></name></contrib><aff>MUHC Reproductive Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff><aff>Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff><aff>McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</aff></contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <day></day>
        <month></month>
        <year></year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day></day>
        <month></month>
        <year></year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>107</fpage>
      <lpage>116</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>1</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>8</day>
          <month>5</month>
          <year>2019</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <abstract>
      <p>
      &lt;p&gt;Background: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the outcomes from IVF-preimplantation genetic testing (IVF-PGT) cycles for single gene defects (SGD) (PGT-M) differ between a privately funded period (PRP) and publicly funded period (PUP).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a North-American single tertiary center. The PRP (March 1998 to July 2010) comprised 56 PGT-M cycles from 58 IVF cycles in 38 couples, and the PUP (August 2010 to May 2015) comprised 59 PGT-M cycles from 87 IVF cycles in 38 couples. One PGT-M cycle is defined as one biopsy procedure from one or serial IVF cycles. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
Results: The clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per PGT-M cycle were 30.4% and 52.5% in each period, respectively (p=0.021). The live birth rates (LBR) per PGT-M cycle were 21.5% versus 40.9% in each period, respectively (p=0.037). A sub-analysis within the PUP comparing 39 PGT-M cycles from 39 IVF cycles with 20 PGT-M cycles from 49 IVF cycles yielded CPRs per PGT-M cycle of 64.1% and 30.0% and LBRs per PGT-M cycle of 53.8% and 15.0%, in each group, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.05 for both).&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: The transition from private to public funding and a single embryo transfer (ET) guideline has little impact on embryological and clinical outcomes of PGT-M cycles, and results in lower rates of multiple pregnancies. However, these two systems may serve different populations.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

      </p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>

    
</article>

