JRI 
Vol. 24, Issue 2, / April-June 2023
(Original Article, pages 132-138)

Mojgan Javedani Masroor
- Shahid Akbar-Abadi Clinical Research Development Unit, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
Ladan Younesi Asl
- Shahid Akbar-Abadi Clinical Research Development Unit, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
Niloufar Sarchami Corresponding Author
- Shahid Akbar-Abadi Clinical Research Development Unit, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran

Received: 9/12/2022 Accepted: 2/8/2023 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute

Related Articles

 

Other Format

 


Abstract

Background: The relationship between uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer and the success of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) has not been properly investigated. In this study, the effect of uterine contractions on embryo implantation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles was investigated to determine whether the frequency of uterine contractions can be used as a quantitative marker to assess endometrial receptivity.
Methods: In this cohort study of 68 eligible FET candidates, one hour before embryo transfer (ET), frequency of uterine contractions was assessed with transvaginal ultrasonography. Patients were followed up for 20 weeks. The association between FET outcomes including clinical pregnancy, abortion, and ectopic pregnancy with uterine contractions was evaluated. Binary logistic regression was conducted to test the association between clinical pregnancy outcomes in different groups. The p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: Of 68 patients, 25 (36.8%) experienced clinical pregnancy. Multiple logistic regression for omitted confounders (age, BMI, duration, type and cause of infertility) revealed that patients with uterine peristaltic wave frequency less than 2≤ wave/min had higher chance of successful pregnancy compared to those with ≥4 wave/min (odds ratio: 10.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-79.4, p=0.019). The Pearson's correlation showed a statistically significant relationship between the frequency of uterine contraction and endometrial thickness (r= 0.42, p=0.002).
Conclusion: Patients with uterine peristalsis of <4.0 wave/min before embryo transfer had a higher chance of successful implantation and pregnancy compared with those with higher contraction frequencies. It seems that measuring uterine contraction frequency before embryo transfer might help to predict pregnancy outcomes.



Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology, Clinical pregnancy, Uterine peristalsis


To cite this article:


Full Text

Introduction
Despite widespread advances in assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs), infertility still affects a large number of patients and is distributed in approximately 10-15% of couples (1). Various methods have been used to overcome to the fertility problems of young infertile couples. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is one of the most commonly used modalities (2). Success rate of IVF depends on multiple factors especially the age of the woman, as well as the cause of infertility such as male factors, immunological factors, anatomical factors, etc. (3) which sometimes lead to planning multiple IVF cycles (4, 5). Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a serious challenge in infertility management (6, 7).
IVF is performed by both fresh (ET) and frozen embryo transfer (FET) (8). Studies have shown that the probability of fertility success following FET is higher than that of fresh ET (9). However, a large number of FET-transferred embryos are not implanted in the first few days (10). Identifying the factors that play critical role in FET cycles failure can increase the likelihood of success and reducing the risk of miscarriage and thus preventing repeated IVF.
The peristaltic contractions of the uterus is defined as wave-like movements in the sub-endometrial layer that can be detected by ultrasound scanning (11). These contractions vary during the menstrual cycle (12). So that at the beginning of the follicular phase, the frequency of these contractions is one to two per minute with small amplitudes around 30 mmHg. Thereafter, the frequency increases to about 3 to 4 per/min towards the time of ovulation. During the luteal phase, both the frequency and amplitude of contractions are decreased to facilitate the implantation of embryo. In ART cycles in which the ovary is stimulated using exogenous hormones compared with normal cycles, the uterine activity appears slightly more in the early luteal phase (4-6 contractions per/min versus 2-4 per/min) (12); thus, a calm uterus is necessary in IVF cycles for embryo implantation (13).
Recent studies have shown that there is an inverse association between uterine contractions and IVF success rate. Therefore, the more uterine contractions, the more embryo expulsion from the uterine cavity (14, 15). However, the number of studies in this area is small and there is still no comprehensive agreement regarding the role of uterine contractions in IVF success. In this study, the role of uterine contractions was investigated in pregnancy outcome in FET cycles to determine whether the frequency of uterine contractions can be used as a quantitative marker to assess endometrial receptivity.

Methods
In this cohort study, 68 eligible FET cycles candidates who were referred to Akbar-Abadi hospital from April 2019 to April 2020 were studied. Patients were those who had previously undergone ovulation stimulation cycles due to various infertility causes and now were candidates for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Inclusion criteria were women aged 25 to 40 years. To limit the interference of confounding variables affecting embryo quality and uterine receptivity, patients were only selected if they had a normal uterus, had at least two good-quality (A or B) day 3-5 embryos with at least 7 cells, with no apparent morphological abnormalities, and fragmentation ≤20%. Women who had received donor eggs and those with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) did not participate in the study. Moreover, women with major systemic or immunologic diseases, intrauterine lesions (polyps and intracavitary myoma), and adenomyosis were excluded. Patients underwent a planned artificial cycle. In "artificial cycle" of FET, the patient is treated with estrogen and progesterone to mimic the natural cycle. All the participants in the study had undergone the FET protocol of the Akbar-Abadi infertility center. In this protocol, they received increasing doses of oral estrogen (estradiol valerate 2 mg, Aburaihan Pharmaceutical Co, Iran), two to three times daily, started from day one of the cycle in which the endometrium is too thin and uterine lining should be improved. Endometrial thickness was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound before adjusting the doses of estradiol valerate (added up to 8-10 mg daily). If the endometrial thickness is ≥7 mm, micronized progesterone (Vaginal suppository, Cyclogest 400 mg, Actavis, Iran) once per day, is administered to the regime. About 4-5 days later, thawing and transferring the embryo is commenced, according to the stage of cryopreservation. Luteal support is continued until 1 month after confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy or until pregnancy is ruled out by negative serum HCG pregnancy test.
One hr before embryo transfer, endometrial thickness was measured by an expert radiologist using a SuperSonic Mach 20 vaginal probe (Hologic, US). The probe was then gently inserted into the vagina by the same radiologist to prevent cervical irritation. After scanning the mid-sagittal plane of the uterus, the probe was introduced into the vagina as gently as possible to avoid stimulating the cervix. The probe was fixed as steady as possible while a 5-min video of uterine peristalsis was recorded simultaneously. The records were analyzed at 4× regular speed using a VLC media player (VideoLAN, France) by two blind experienced radiologists. The uterine peristaltic wave frequency was the mean of the results reported by each observer. The next step was the embryo transfer, under the guidance of abdominal ultrasound to locate the catheter correctly and prevent unwanted trauma to the endometrium. All the embryo transfers were performed by an expert who was blind to the study design. Patients were followed up to 20 weeks of ongoing pregnancy, whether they ended in normal pregnancy or abortion. Clinical pregnancy was defined as ultra-sonographic visualization of gestational sac, 2-3 weeks after the positive chemical pregnancy test and around 7 weeks after the embryo transfer, and miscarriage was defined as an abortion between 7-20 weeks. The mean frequency of uterine contractions, which was documented by an expert radiologist, was categorized into three subgroups: ≤2, 2.1-4, and ≥4 wave/min. The leading purpose of the study was measuring the uterine contraction frequency before the frozen embryo transfer and analyzing its association with the embryo transfer outcomes including clinical pregnancy as the primary outcome and abortion as the secondary outcome. In addition, the association of other factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), duration of infertility, and previous pregnancy history was assessed based on pregnancy outcomes. It should be noted that luteal phase support was continued for one month after confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy or until pregnancy was ruled out by a negative serum HCG measurement result.
Statistical analysis and sample size calculation: SPSS vs. 16 (IBM, US) was used for data analysis. Mean and standard deviation were used to express quantitative descriptive data and frequency and percentage for qualitative findings. Independent t-test and chi-square were used to analyze normal data and Mann-Whitney U test for abnormally distributed ones. Multiple logistic regression with backward approach was used to test the relations between dependent parameters (pregnancy and abortion) and independent parameters (frequency and confounders), and also Pearson test was used to evaluate the correlations. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The sample size was calculated using the findings of previous studies and G–Power software with a power of 90% (19).
The participants’ information was used without disclosing their identities. Also, a written informed consent was obtained from all patients. They also had the right to withdraw from the study whenever they wished. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Code IR. IUMS.FMD.REC.1398.266).

Results
The mean age of study population was 34.50± 5.60 years (25 to 40 years). The mean body mass index was 26.63±3.83 kg/m2. In addition, the mean duration of infertility was 6.17 years (1 to 15 years). A total of 41 (60.3%) patients had primary infertility and 27 (39.7%) had secondary infertility. Of 68 patients, 33(48.5%) had undergone ART before. Among participants, 27 (39%) had a history of a prior successful pregnancy, 17 (25%) had prior abortions, and only one (3.7%) had experienced ectopic pregnancy before. The mean numbers of embryos transferred, in pregnant and non-pregnant subjects, were 2.3±0.7 and 2.2± 0.9, respectively (p=0.727).
Of 68 participants, 25 (36.8%) had successful embryo transfer and became clinically pregnant. Ectopic pregnancy was not observed in any of these women. Seven (28.0%) women with clinical pregnancy experienced abortion in the 20th week of follow-up. In most abortions (71.4%), higher uterine frequencies (more than 3 wave/min) were reported. The range of uterine frequency was reported between one to eight wave/min. There was also no significant association between demographic factors and pregnancy outcomes in the study participants (Table 1).
All patients were subjectively divided into three groups according to uterine peristaltic wave frequency on embryo transfer day: ≤2.0, 2.1–4, and ≥4.0 waves/min. Frequency in most patients (60%) who became pregnant was equal to or below 2 wave/min, and only 2 (8.0%) had higher frequencies. In this study, those who had frequencies higher than 4 waves/min demonstrated the lowest pregnancy rate. The mean of uterine peristaltic wave frequency in the pregnant group was lower in comparison to non-pregnant group (2.2±1.6 vs. 3.3±1.2 waves/min, p=0.002).
Binary logistic regression revealed that lower uterine peristaltic wave frequency on the day of embryo transfer was significantly related to the chance of clinical pregnancy. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that patients with uterine peristaltic wave frequency less than 2≤ wave/min (odds ratio: 5.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-31.3, p=0.042) and those with 2 to 4 wave/min (odds ratio: 2.0; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-11.2, p=0.431) had higher chance of successful pregnancy compared to those with 4≥ wave/min (Table 2). Multiple logistic regression for omitted confounders (age, BMI, cause and type of infertality) revealed that patients with uterine peristaltic wave frequency less than 2≤ wave/min (odds ratio: 10.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-79.4, p=0.019) had higher chance of successful pregnancy compared to those with 4≥ wave/min. The endometrial thickness ranged from 7 mm to 15 mm, and the mean endometrial thickness was 9.02±2.2 mm. There was no significant difference in the mean of endometrial thickness between the groups of pregnant and non-pregnant ones (9.03±2.58 mm vs. 8.05±1.90 mm, p=0.631) as well as who experienced abortion (p=0.38). Furthermore, the Pearson’s correlation showed a significant correlation between uterine contraction frequency and endometrial thickness (r=0.420, p=0.002).

Discussion
Improvement in controlled ovarian stimulation and laboratory advances have provided high-quality embryos for infertile couples, leading to a steady increase in IVF success over the past years. Mock embryo transfer studies have also demonstrated the important role of uterine peristalsis in controlling the migration of analogs (14, 16, 17). Lesny et al. observed that the transferred fluid, after touching the uterine fundus with a catheter, can be removed from the uterine cavity with severe uterine contractions (18). Another study also showed that the frequency of uterine peristaltic waves was positively correlated with the distance that fluids move after deposition in the uterine cavity (14). Since uterine peristalsis can affect analog drift during the implantation window, it may also affect the outcome of subsequent clinical pregnancies during the actual embryo transfer cycle. Therefore, it was decided to assess the association between uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer and the rate of clinical pregnancy by frozen embryo transfer. There is still controversy regarding the effect of uterine contractions on pregnancy outcomes after IVF. In some studies, a lower frequency of uterine contractions has been associated with better outcomes in successful clinical pregnancies. Fanchin et al. prospectively studied 209 infertile women undergoing 220 cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation (19). They showed that the high frequency of uterine contractions on the day of embryo transfer affects the IVF outcomes, possibly by expelling the embryo from the uterine cavity. In addition, in Chung et al.’s study, live births were found to be significantly reduced in those with higher uterine contractions 5 minutes after embryo transfer, whereas uterine contractions before embryo transfer did not affect pregnancy outcomes (20). In another study by Zhu et al., the effect of uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer on the likelihood of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles was investigated and it was revealed that clinical pregnancy rate was the highest when less than 3 waves per minute were recorded (17). With increasing peristaltic wave frequency, the rate of clinical pregnancy decreased significantly, especially at frequencies greater than 3. In contrast, the overall results of our study showed that women with a frequency of uterine peristalsis less than 4 waves per/min before embryo transfer were more likely to become pregnant than those with a higher frequency. In a pilot study by Blank et al., it was found that uterine activity after embryo transfer, characterized by high frequency and low amplitude, may be beneficial to embryo implantation (21). In our study, women who became pregnant after successful embryo transfer had lower uterine contraction frequency on the day of embryo transfer. In addition, an inverse correlation between the frequency and clinical pregnancy was observed in frequencies higher than 4 per minute. This is in line with some previous studies which emphasized an optimal range of contraction frequencies for successful implantation (17, 20). Another factor affecting the consequences of pregnancy following embryo transfer cycles is the direction of uterine contractions (14, 20, 22). In the study of Kim et al., pregnancy outcome was significantly correlated with endometrial movements related to the number of contractions, intense movement, cervicofundal direction, and hyperechoic change; so a higher rate of cervicofundal movement was reported in the pregnant group (22). However, this was not evaluated in our investigation. Endometrial thickness is the most widely used prognostic indicator to predict endometrial acceptance. Although observations show that the association between endometrial thickness and IVF results is still controversial (23, 24), there is a general agreement that thin endometrium is associated with lower pregnancy rates. In addition, several studies have shown that there is an association between endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer (25, 26). It seems that an appropriate range of endometrium thickness is more effective than just a thicker endometrium in implantation success. Since embryo transfer was done when endometrial thickness was ≥7 mm similar to previous studies (27), no statistical relationship between pregnant and non-pregnant cases was seen based on the endometrial thickness. Incidentally, in our study, a positive correlation between endometrial thickness and uterine contraction frequency was seen and the two subjects with the highest endometrial thickness, ≥ 14 mm, showed the highest frequencies and both experienced transfer failure. It might be another evidence which indicates the inverse correlation between frequency and the embryo transfer outcomes. Nonetheless, the number of subjects with the thickest endometrium was very low and further studies should be conducted. Moreover, our study shows statistically significant inverse correlation between the contraction frequency and the occurrence of abortion in those who became pregnant, which illustrates the role of high uterine contraction frequencies even after implantation, that may interfere with final success of pregnancy. It is known that very thin endometrial thickness is not appropriate for implantation and it may lead to abortion. On the other hand, abortion might occur in the endometrium with the lowest contraction frequency. In fact, our sample size with thin endometrium was limited and further studies are required to be conducted to prove the claim (28). Moreover, no cases of ectopic pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer were reported in our study.

Conclusion
In this study, the optimal range of uterine contraction frequency was effective in successful implantation and ongoing pregnancy rate before embryo transfer. In fact, very high frequencies had adverse effects on the embryo transfer outcomes. A new finding from the current study was the association of endometrial thickness with uterine contractions. Thus, measuring the frequency of uterine contraction before embryo transfer seems to have some diagnostic values in predicting pregnancy outcomes. However, in addition to frequency, other indicators such as amplitude and directions of uterine contractions should be evaluated in future studies to expand our knowledge about the role of uterine contractions in IVF.

Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the Shahid-Akbarabadi Clinicical Research Development Unit (SHACDU), Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), Tehran Iran for their cooperation through the period of study (Grant number:15077).

Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding: None.




Figures, Charts, Tables


Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristics based on pregnancy outcomes
Note: BMI: Body Mass Index, ART: Assisted Reproductive Techniques, SD: Standard Deviation
* Independent t-test, ** Mann-Whitney test, # Chi-square test

Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristics based on pregnancy outcomes

Note: BMI: Body Mass Index, ART: Assisted Reproductive Techniques, SD: Standard Deviation

* Independent t-test, ** Mann-Whitney test, # Chi-square test




Table 2. Pregnancy outcomes in different uterine peristaltic wave frequency groups
Dependent variable: pregnancy=1, OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval

Table 2. Pregnancy outcomes in different uterine peristaltic wave frequency groups

Dependent variable: pregnancy=1, OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval



References

  1. Taylor HS, Pal L, Sell E. Speroff's clinical gyneco-logic endocrinology and infertility. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. 973 p.
  2. Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1755-61.   [PubMed]
  3. Szamatowicz M. Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine-possibilities and limitations. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(12):820-3.   [PubMed]
  4. Lahav-Baratz S, Koifman M, Shiloh H, Ishai D, Wiener-Megnazi Z, Dirnfeld M. Analyzing factors affecting the success rate of frozen–thawed embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(11):444-8.   [PubMed]
  5. Baker VL, Jones CE, Cometti B, Hoehler F, Salle B, Urbancsek J, et al. Factors affecting success rates in two concurrent clinical IVF trials: an examination of potential explanations for the difference in pregnancy rates between the United States and Europe. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1287-91.   [PubMed]
  6. Younglai EV, Holloway AC, Foster WG. Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(1):43-57.   [PubMed]
  7. Bretherick KL, Fairbrother N, Avila L, Harbord SH, Robinson WP. Fertility and aging: do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know? Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2162-8.   [PubMed]
  8. Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, De Mouzon J, Erb K, D'Hooghe T, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(10):2099-113.   [PubMed]
  9. Shen C, Shu D, Zhao X, Gao Y. Comparison of clinical outcomes between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(6):409-14.   [PubMed]
  10. Li M, Xie Y, Park H, Kumar A, Hubert G, Buyalos R. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer improves clinical outcomes in patients receiving IVF treatment. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):S177.
  11. Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, van Katwijk C, Lo CR, Hoogland HJ. Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(4):746-9.   [PubMed]
  12. Bulletti C, de Ziegler D, Polli V, Diotallevi L, Ferro ED, Flamigni C. Uterine contractility during the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2000;15 Suppl 1:81-9.   [PubMed]
  13. Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, Schönauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1115-9.   [PubMed]
  14. Zhu L, Xiao L, Che H, Li Y, Liao J. Uterine peristalsis exerts control over fluid migration after mock embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(2):279-85.   [PubMed]
  15. Kuijsters NPM, Methorst WG, Kortenhorst MSQ, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Schoot BC. Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(1):50-71.   [PubMed]
  16. Hunt S, Abdallah KS, Ng E, Rombauts L, Vollenhoven B, Mol BW. Impairment of uterine contractility is associated with unexplained infertility. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(1):61-73.   [PubMed]
  17. Zhu L, Che H, Xiao L, Li Y. Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1238-43.   [PubMed]
  18. Lesny P, Killick S, Tetlow R, Robinson J, Maguiness S. Embryo transfer--can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1540-6.   [PubMed]
  19. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(7):1968-74.   [PubMed]
  20. Chung CHS, Wong AWY, Chan CPS, Saravelos SH, Kong GWS, Cheung LP, et al. The changing pattern of uterine contractions before and after fresh embryo transfer and its relation to clinical outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(3):240-7.   [PubMed]
  21. Blank C, Sammali F, Kuijsters N, Huang Y, Rabotti C, de Sutter P, et al. Assessment of uterine activity during IVF by quantitative ultrasound imaging: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(6):1045-53.   [PubMed]
  22. Kim A, Lee JY, Ji YI, Lee HH, Lee ES, Kim HY, et al. Do endometrial movements affect the achievement of pregnancy during intrauterine insemination? Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8(4):399-408.   [PubMed]
  23. Check JH, Dietterich C, Graziano V, Lurie D, Choe JK. Effect of maximal endometrial thickness on outcome after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1399-400.   [PubMed]
  24. Groenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Al‐Oraiby A, Brinkhuis EA, Broekmans FJ, de Bruin JP, et al. Influence of endometrial thickness on pregnancy rates in modified natural cycle frozen‐thawed embryo transfer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(7):808-15.   [PubMed]
  25. Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ. Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):53-9.   [PubMed]
  26. Bu Z, Sun Y. The impact of endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration on ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with different ovarian response. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145703.   [PubMed]
  27. Wang Y, Zhu Y, Sun Y, Di W, Qiu M, Kuang Y, et al. Ideal embryo transfer position and endometrial thickness in IVF embryo transfer treatment. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(3):282-8.   [PubMed]
  28. Xu J, Zhang S, Jin L, Mao Y, Shi J, Huang R, et al. The effects of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of over 40,000 cycles among five reproductive centers in China. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;12:788706.   [PubMed]

COPE
SID
NLM
AJMB
IJBMLE
IJBMLE

Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and managed by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution –NonCommercial 4.0 International License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2024 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.