Nesa Asnafi Corresponding Author
- Department of Obstet . and Gynecol , Yahyanejad Hospital, Babol Medical Sciences University, Babol, Iran
Karimollah Hajian
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Science & Health Services, Babol, Iran
Asieh Abdollahi
- Department of Obstet . and Gynecol , Yahyanejad Hospital, Babol Medical Sciences University, Babol, Iran

Received: 10/1/2004 Accepted: 10/1/2004 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute

Related Articles


Other Format



Introduction: Hysterectomy is one of the most common operations in the world. It is divided into two main abdominal and vaginal categories. Each type has usually specific indications but sometimes they have common indications. The main causes of abdominal hysterectomy are uterine fibroma, AUB, resistant PID, endometriosis, gynecologic malignancies, adenomyosis with vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain and cervical CIN and the most important indication for vaginal hysterectomy is uterine prolaps. Considering the importance and prevalence of hysterectomy and its side effects, we decided to compare the complications of vaginal versus abdominal hysteric-tomy to try to define more solid criteria for selecting hysterectomy method for the candidate patients. Materials and Methods: This is a case-control (retrospective) analytic study.Data was collected from March 2001 until March 2003 of patient who had hysterectomies in GYN Department of Yahyanejad hospital in Babol. Of the 339 women who had undergone hysterectomy, 57 (16.8%) had received vaginal and 282 (83.2%) abdominal hysterectomy. The Variables Considered included age, days of hospitalization, decrease in hemoglobin concentration and other early side effects of hysterectomy. The data was analyzed by SPSS software Program using 2, t- test and fisher's exact test and multiple logistic model. Results: The mean age of the Patients who had undergone hysterectomy was 58.512 years for Vaginal and 44.697.9 years for abdominal hysterectomy. The overall Complication rates were 23.7% and 5.3% (p=0.01) for abdominal and Vaginal hysterectomies, respectively. Fever was the main complication after surgery with a frequency of 18.4% and 3.5% for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies, respectively. The decrease in hematocrit was lower in abdominal (2.392.05%) than in vaginal (3.761.32%) hysterectomy (p<0.001 ). conclusion: the results indicate that the overall complications in vaginal hysterectomy are less than abdominal which may suggest that vaginal hysterectomy may be an appropriate alternative for abdominal hysterectomy.< pan>

Keywords: Hysterectomy, Abdominal hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy, Uterine fibroma, Abenomyosis

To cite this article:


  1. John A., Rock- Howard W., Jones III. Te linde’s operative gynecology. (9th Edition) Lipini-cott, Williams & Wilkins.2003;(2)pp: 799-824.
  2. Graves E.J. Detailed diagnosis and procedures: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1993. Vital Health Stat.1995;122:1-288.
  3. Wilcox L.S., Koonin L.M., Pokras R. Hysterec-tomies in the United States, 1998-1990. Obstete Gynecol.1994;83:549-55.
  4. Kjerulff K.H., Guzinski G.M., Langenberg P.W., Hysterectomy and race. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:757-764.
  5. Jonathan S., B. Novak’s Gynecology. (3th Edition). Lippinincott willams and wilkins co, 2001;(1)pp:590.
  6. Saini J., kucyzynski E., Gretz H.F. (3th Edition) Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdomi-nal hysterectomy: Perceived eefects on sexual function. BMC Womens Health.2002;2(1):1.
  7. Kovac S.R.Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol.1995; 85:18-23.
  8. Dicker R.C., Greenspan J.R., Strauss L.T., et al. Complication of abdominal and vaginal hyste-rictomy among women of reproductive age in the united states. Am J obstet Gynecol.1982;144: 841-845.
  9. Doucette R.C., Shorp H.T., Alder S.C. Chale-nging generally accepted contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy. Am J obstet Gynecol.2001; 184(7):1386-9.
  10. Korn A.P., Groullonk K., Hessol N. Infections morbidity associated with abdominal hystetereco-tmy. J Am Coll Surg.1997;185(4): 404-7.
  11. Moller C., Kehlet H., Utzon J. Hysterectomy in Denmark. An analysis of post operative hospit-allization, morbidity and readmittion.Ugesker Le-ager.2002;164(34):4539-45.
  12. National center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Discharge Survey,1997. CD-Rom.Wash-ington, DC: National center for health Statistics.
  13. Kovec S.R., Transvaginal hysterectomy: ratio-nale and Surgical approach. Obstet Gynecol.2004; 103(6):1321-5.
  14. Cynthia M., Faraquhr, M.D. Franzcog. Hyste-rectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstet Gynecol.2002;99:229-34.
  15. Hau K., Lin J., Liu X., et al. Four surgical pat-terns for hysterectomy for uterine without prola-psis: a clinical study. Zhonghua YL Xue Zo Zhi. 2002;82(23):1599-603.
  16. Fountain J., Gallagher J., Brown J.A practical approach to a multi- level analysis with a sparse binary outcome whitin a large surgical trial. J Eval Clin Pract.2004;10(2):323-7.
  17. Cosson M., Lambaudie E., Boukerrou M. Vaginal, Laparoscopic, or abdominal hysterecto-myyies for benign disorders: immediate and early postoperative complications.Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2001;98(2):231-6.
  18. Makinen J., Johansson J., Tomas C., et al. Morbiditiy of 10110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Repord. 2001;16(7):1473-8.
  19. Garry R., Fountain J., Mason S., Hawe J., Napp V., Abbott J., Clayton F., Philips G., Whitt-aker M., Lilford R., Bridgman S., Brown J. The evaluate study: two Parallel randomised trails, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysteric-tomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ.2004;328(7432):129.
  20. AI- Kadri H.M., Al-Turki H.A., Saleh A. Short and long term complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for disease. Saudi Med J. 2002;23(7):806-15.
  21. Benassi L., Rossit. K. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2002;187(6): 1561-5.
  22. Davies A., Hart R., Magos A. Hysterectomy: Surgical route and complications. Eur J Obset Gynecol.2002;104:148-151.
  23. Larsson P.G., Carlsson B.Does pre_and post operaitive metronidazole treatment lower vaginal cuff infection rate after abdominal hysterectomy? Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol.2002;10(3):133-40.
  24. Chongsomchai C., Lumbigonon P. Placebo controlled, double-blind, randomiyed study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective abdominal hys-terictomy: J Hosp Infect.2002;52(4):302-6.
  25. Lambaudie E., Boukerrou M., Cosson M. Hysterectomy for benign lesions: preoperative and early postoperative complications. Ann Chir.2002 ;125(4):340-5.
  26. Hau K., lin J., lia X., et al. Four surgical patte-rns for hysterectomy for uterine with out prolap-sis:a clinical study. Zhonghua YL xue Za zhi. 2002;82(23):1599-1603.
  27. Kovac SR.Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol.2000;45: 18-23.
  28. Al-fozan H., Dufort J., Kaplow M et al. Cost analysis of myomectomy. Hysterectomy and uter-ine artery embolization. Am J obstet Gynecol. 2002;87(5):1401-4.


Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and managed by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution –NonCommercial 4.0 International License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2024 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.