- Hossein Soleimani
 - 1- Department of Religious Descended from Abraham, Center for Religious Studies and Research, Qom, Iran
- 2- Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Qom, Iran
Received: 10/1/2005 Accepted: 10/1/2005 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute |
| Related Articles |
|
| Other Format |
|
|
|
Abstract
In Torah, the first and most important source of Jewish laws, there is no direct mention of a willful abortion. This book only refers to the abortion of a pregnant woman’s fetus in the course of a quarrel. In similar cases one who causes this kind of abortion shall pay fines. Talmud, the second important source of Jewish laws, refers to willful abortions. According to Talmud, abortion, although prohibited, is not punishable by death penalty. In spite of prohibition of abortion in Tal-mud, this book sometimes permits abortion. According to Talmudic laws, abortion is permitted if the fetus endangers the mother’s life, but from the moment that the head or the greater part of its body has emerged into the world, no one can abort it; because here there are two living beings, and no one can say the life of the mother is more important than that of the fetus. Yet, when the mother’s life is endangered, she herself may destroy the fetus even if the greater part of the fetus has come out of her body, according to "self-defense" rule. Some Jewish texts maintain that abor-tion should be permitted if it is necessary for rescuing the mothers life, even if there is no fatality attached to the pregnancy or the mother’s illness is not directly caused by the fetus. The permissi-bility of abortion in relation to a pregnancy resulting from adultery has been a matter of contro-versy. Many Jewish scholars have permitted abortion by a married woman made pregnant through adultery,but not by an unmarried woman who becomes pregnant, because, according to the Jewish laws, the child of the former woman is regarded as a bastard, but the child of the latter, i.e. unmarried womans, is not regarded so. According to Talmud, abortion is permitted, if a womans pregnancy results from adultery and she is condemned to death. In this case, abortion is permitted, and it is even said that it is obligatory to do it before execution process starts, except the time when delivery has started. In recent years, the question of permissibility of abortion has been raised in cases where there is the fear of malformation or of a birth defect in the fetus. The general tendency is to uphold the prohibition against abortion in such cases. Yet, some neo-Jewish jurists have adopted a lighter view and permitted abortion in some cases.
Keywords:
Abortion, Judaism, Jewish laws, Torah, Talmud, Malformation, Birth defect adultery, Neo-Jewish jurists To cite this article:References
- سفر خروج، 21:22-25؛ همة ارجاعات به کتاب مقدس از نسخة زير است: کتاب مقدس. به همت انجمن پخش کتب مقدسه، 1985 (افست از روي نسخة 1904).
- Spec. 3: 108: cf. M.E., "Abortion", Encyclopaedia Judaica, v.2. p.98. .3
- Ant.4:478;cf.M.E., op.cit. p.99.
- ميک تئوفيل . قانون¬نامة حمورابي. ترجمة کاميار عبدي. چاپ دوم، سازمان ميراث فرهنگي، تهران (1376).
- Tos. Sanhedrin 59b; Hulin 33a. cf The Babylonion Talmud. 18 vols, ed.: J. Epstein, the soneino Press, London, 1935-52.
- Talmud, Yevamut 62b. Nida 13a and 31a.
- Apion 2:202;cf. M.E., op.cit., p.99.
- سفر خروج، 22:1؛ همة ارجاعات به کتاب مقدس از نسخة زير است: کتاب مقدس. به همت انجمن پخش کتب مقدسه، 1985 (افست از روي نسخة 1904).
- Zohar, Exodus, 3b; cf. The Zohar. Translated by Harvy Sperling and others. v.3.
- Michael Fishbane, op. cit., p.23.ونيز رک: پاديادند (پژوهشنامه? يهود ايران)، ج¬2، ص¬ 372 -373 .
- Sanhedrin 72a; 8:7.
- Tos. Sanhedrin 72b; Hulin 72a. cf The Babylonion Talmud. 18 vols, ed.: J. Epstein, the soneino Press, London, 1935-52.
- TJ, Sanhedrin, 8:9; 26c.
- Meiri, Sanhedrin 72b.
- Cf. M.E., op. cit., p.100.
- Maharit, Resp. no 99; cf. M.E. , Op.Cit., p. 100.
- Cf. M.E. op. cit., p. 100.
- Cf. M.E. , op.cit., p. 101.
- Cf. B. Z. Sch., "Mamzer", Encyclopaedia dudaica, v.11, P. 810-842.
- Cf. M.E., op.cit, p. 111.
- پادياوند، ج¬ 2 ، ص 374 .
- Cf. Michael Fishbane, op. 23-24.
- Ibid; Catechism Of The Catholic Church, Veritas. 1st Ed. ,publietion.1994;p:24.
- Cf. M.E. , op.cit., p.111.
- پادياوند، ج¬ 2 ، ص 377 .
- از سخنان خاخام يديديا شوفط، به نقل از پادياوند، ج2 ، ص 387 – 398.
- حافظ محمد(صبري). المقارنات و المقابلات بين احکام المرافعات و المعاملات و الحدود في شرع اليهود و نظائرها في الشريعة الاسلاميه، چاپ اول، مطعبة هنديه، مصر (1902)، ص569-586.
- M. Oholot 7:6. cf. Michael Fishbane. "the Image of the Human and the Rights of the Individual in Jewish Tradition." In: Leroy S.Rouner (ed.). Human Rights and the World's Religions. University of Notre Dam Press, 1988; p23.
- و نيز رک: نتصر امنون (به کوشش) . پادياوند (پژوهشنامة يهود ايران) . ج2، انتشارات فردا، لسآنجلس (1997)، ج2، ص372-373.
- Michael Fishbane, op. cit., p.23.
- ونيز رک: پاديادند (پژوهشنامهٴ يهود ايران)، ج2، ص 372 -373 .