Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi Corresponding Author
- Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center, Isfahan, Iran
Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
- Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Zohreh Behjati Ardakani
- Avicenna Infertility Clinic, Avicenna Research Institute (ACECR), Tehran, Iran

Received: 10/1/2005 Accepted: 10/1/2005 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute

Related Articles


Other Format



By the means of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracyctoplasmic sperm injection techniques (ICSI), more than one million infants have been born throughout the world. One of the interesting happenings in infertility treatment pro-cedures, that needs to be addressed, is the occurrence of multiple pregnancies which is usually seen following the use of ovary stimulating medications, embryo hatching and transference of a high number of embryos for higher success rates. For reducing the chances of this problem and preventing subsequent complications during pregnancy, embryo reduction is employed for two purposes: 1. Embryo reduction in triple or higher pregnancies, for the prevention of fetal and maternal complications and 2. Selective embryo reduction in cases where one or more fetuses have malformations or chromosomal defects. Embryo reduction methods: Dilatation of cervix and suction of one or more fetuses, via transvaginal route, by the help of sonography and trans-abdominally by the use of sonography. Although medical doctors might not be eager enough to know about embryo reduction in multiple pregnancies, but they have to know about the pro-cedures and be prepared for medical interventions in emergencies, based on ethical and legal principles or on the request of patients. The first step, especially in infertility clinics, is reducing the chances or preventing the occurrence of these instances. Although selective reduction of embryos is ethically and legally accepted, but before any moves taken, offering infertility coun-seling is essential and it should include the expression of the risks of multiple pregnancies and ethical issues in embryo reduction before the transference of embryo(s) to the uterus, as lack of information on these subjects may lead to more problems afterwards. This study reviews the medical and ethical aspects of the issue and also introduces embryo reduction techniques in multiple pregnancies,in methods employing ovarian stimulating medications and in in vitro fer-tilization techniques. This method of embryo reduction, will reduce the risks of abortion, pre-mature births, birth of malformed children and fetal demise,otherwise these would be the case if measures are not taken to correct the problem.

Keywords: Embryo reduction, Multiple pregnancies, Chromosomal defect, Assisted Reproductive Techniques, Transvaginal, Trans-abdominal

To cite this article:


  1. محمد روحاني، فاطمه نوغاني. احكام پزشكي تهيه و تدوين، ارديبهشت ماه 1378.
  2. Evans M.I., Fletcher J.C., Zador I.E., Newton B.W., Quigg M.H., Struyk C.D., Selective first-trimester ter-mination in octuplet and quadruplet pregnancies: clinical and ethical issues. Obstet Gynecol.1988;71: 289-96.
  3. Berkowitz R.L., Lynch L., Chitkara U., Wilkins I.A., Mehlaek K.E., Alvarez E. Selective reduction of multi-fetal pregnancies in the first trimester. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1043-7.
  4. Wapner R.J., Davis G.H., Jahoson A., Weinblatt V.J., Fisher R.L., Jackson L.G., et al. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet.1990;335:90-3.
  5. Jain T., Missmer S.A., Hornstein M.D. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. N Engl J Med.2004;350(16):1639-45.
  6. Scholtes M.C.W., Zelimaker G.H. A prospective, rando-mized study of embryo transfer results after 3 or 5 days of embryo culture In Invitro Fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:1245.
  7. Berkowitz R.L. Ethical issues involving multifetal pregnancies. Mount Sinai J Med.1998;3:185-190.
  8. Zaner R.M., Boehm F.H., Hill G.A. Selective termina-tion in multiple pregnancies: ethical considerations. Fertil Steril.1990;54:203-5.
  9. Salat- Baroux J., Aknin J., Antoine J.M., Alvarez S., Cornet D., et al. Is there an indication for embryo re-duction? Hum Reprod.1992;7(Suppl 1):67-72. Review.
  10. Luke B. The changing pattern of multiple births in the United States: maternal and infant characteristics, 1973 and 1990. Obstet Gynecol.1994;84:101-106.
  11. Martin P.M., Welch H.G. Probabilities for singleton and multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril.1998;70:478-481.
  12. The patients’ guide to IVF clinics. Human Fertilisa-tion and Embryology Authority. London.2000.
  13. The patients’ guide to IVF clinics. Human Fertilisa-tion and Embryology Authority. London.1999.
  14. The patients’ guide to DI and IVF clinics. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. London.1998.
  15. The patients’ guide to DI and IVF clinics. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 3rd Edition. London.1997.
  16. The patients’ guide to DI and IVF clinics. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2nd Edition. London.1996.
  17. Evans M.I., Littmann L., St Louis L., LeBlanc L., Addis J., et al. Evolving patterns of iatrogenic multi-fetal pregnancy generation: implications for aggre-ssiveness of infertility treatments. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1995;172(6):1750-3.
  18. Guzick D.S., Carson S.A., Coutifaris C., Overstreet J.W., Factor-Litvak P., et al. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infer-tility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med.1999;340(3):177-83.
  19. Gleicher N., Oleske D.M., Tur-Kaspa I., Vidali A., Karande V. Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotro-pins. N Engl J Med.2000;343(1):2-7.
  20. Chen S.U., Ko T.M., Hwa H.L., Lu P.J., Ho H.N., Yang Y.S. Maternal serum C-reactive protein level does not change significantly after reduction : It could be used as an indicator of chorioamnineties. J Assist Reported Genet.2001;18:336-40.
  21. Lieberman B. An embryo too many?. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2664-2666.
  22. Sebire N.J. Swedish in-vitro fertilisation study. Lancet 2000;355(9206):845.
  23. Wennerholm U.B., et al. Incidence of congenital mal-formations in children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:944-948.
  24. Kaufman G.E., Malone F.D. Harvey- Wilkes K.B., et al. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies in the first trimester. N Engle J Med.1988;318:1043-1047.
  25. Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cen-ters for Disease Control and Prevention, December 1999.
  26. Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cen-ters for Disease Control and Prevention, December 2000.
  27. 9th annual report and accounts. London, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.2000.
  28. Schieve L.A., Peterson H.B., Meikle S.F., Jeng G., Danel I., et al. Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization.JAMA.1999;282(19):1832-8.
  29. Yokoyama Y., Shimizu T., Hayakawa K. Antenatal complications in triplet pregnancies and birth weights of triplets compared with those of twins. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi.1995;42:113-120.
  30. Syrop C.H., Varner M.W. Triplet gestation: maternal and neonatal implications. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae
  31. Albrecht J.L., Tomich P.G. The maternal and neonatal outcome of triplet gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1551-1556.
  32. Makhseed M., Al-Sharhan M., Egbase P., Al-Essa M., Grudzinskas J.G. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of multiple pregnancy following IVF-ET. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.1998;61(2):155-63.
  33. Doyle P. The outcome of multiple pregnancy. Hum Reprod.1996;11(S4):110-117.
  34. Nadal F., et al. Triplet pregnancies in France. Results of a retrospective, multicenter study of two years (1987-1988).Proposals for optimal management. Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d Obstetrique.1992;87: 267-276.
  35. Wolff K. Excessive use of cesarean section for the second twin? Gynecol Obstet Invest.2000;50:28-32.
  36. Manzur A., et al. Outcome of triplet pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques: how frequent are the vanishing embryos? Fertil Steril.1995;63:252-257.
  37. MacGillivray I. Physiological changes in twin preg-nancy. In: MacGillivray I, Nylander PPS, Corney G, eds. Human multiple reproduction. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders.1975.
  38. MacGillivray I., Campbell D., Duffus G.M. Maternal metabolic response to twin pregnancy in primigra-vidae. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw.1971;78(6): 530-4.
  39. Callahan T.L., et al. The economic impact of multiple gestation pregnancies and the contribution of Assisted Reproduction techniques to their incidence. N Engl J Med.1994;331:244-249.
  40. Seoud M.A., Kruithoff C., Muasher S.J. Outcome of triplet and quadruplet pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;41(2):79-84.
  41. Vauthier-Brouzes D., Lefebvre J. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies: Technical and psychological aspects. Fertil Steril.1992;57:1012-6.
  42. Goldfarb J., Kinzer D.J., Boyle M., Kurit D. Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil Steril.1996;65(4) :815-20.
  43. Yaron Y., Bryant-Greenwood P.K., Dave N., Molden-hauer J.S., Kramer R.L., et al. Multifetal pregnancy reductions of triplets to twins: comparison with non-reduced triplets and twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1999; 180(5):1268-71.
  44. Tallo C.P., Vohr B., Oh W., Rubin L.P., Seifer D.B., Haning R.V.Jr. Maternal and neonatal morbidity asso-ciated with in vitro fertilization. J Pediatr.1995;127(5): 794-800.
  45. Patel N., et al. Scottish Twin Study 1983: Preliminary Report. Glasgow, Greater Glasgow Health Board.1983: 12-13.
  46. Gerris J., Van Royen E. Avoiding multiple pregnan-cies in ART: a plea for single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod.2000;15:1884-1888.
  47. Varma T.R. Ultrasound evidence of early pregnancy failure in patients with multiple conceptions. Bri J Obstet Gynaecol.1979;86:290-292.
  48. Robinson H.P., Caines J.S. Sonar evidence of early pregnancy failure in patients with twin conceptions. Bri J Obstet Gynaecol.1977;84:22-25.
  49. Jauniaux E., et al. Clinical and morphologic aspects of the vanishing twin phenomenon. Obstet Gynecol.1988; 72:577-581.
  50. Dodd J., Crowther C. Multifetal Pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies to twins. Fertile Steril.2004;81:1420-1422.
  51. Dickey R.P., Taylor S.N., Lu P.Y., Sartor B.M., Stor-ment J.M., et al. Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2002;186(1):77-83.
  52. Landy H.J., Weiner S., Corson S.L., Batzer F.R., Bolognese R.J. The "vanishing twin": ultrasonographic assessment of fetal disappearance in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155(1):14-9.
  53. Evans M.I., Goldberg J.D., Horenstein J., Wapner R. J., Ayoub M.A., et al Selective termination for struc-tural, chromosomal, and mendelian anomalies: inter-national experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1999;181 (4):893-7
  54. Geva E., et al. Second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction facilitates prenatal diagnosis before the pro-cedure. Fertil Steril.2000;73:505-508.
  55. Antsaklis A.J., et al. Selective feticide of an affected fetus in the second trimester has comparable risks to those in the first trimester. Prenatal Diagnosis.2001; 2:135-137.
  56. مجله پزشكي قانوني سال پنجم (باروري مصنوعي و حكم فقهي آنها ) شماره 19-17.
  57. Lipitz S., Mashiach S., Seidman D.S. Multifetal preg-nancy reduction: the case for nondirective patient counselling. Hum Reprod.1994;9:1978- 1979.
  58. Herman A., Maymon R., Ron-el R., Halperin R., Ariely S., et al. Improved techniques for first-trimester fetal reduction using simultaneous abdominal and transvaginal ultrasonographic guidance. Preliminary report. Gynecol Obstet Invest.1995;39(3):145-8.
  59. Vauthier-Brouzes D., Lefebvre G. Selective reduction in multifetal pregnancies: technical and psychological aspects. Fertil Steril.1992;57:1012-1016.
  60. Shalev J., et al. Improving pregnancy outcome in twin gestations with one malformed fetus by postponing selective feticide in the third trimester. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:257-260.
  61. Hartoov J., et al. A 3 year, prospectively-designed stu-dy of late selective multifetal pregnancy reduction. Hum Reprod.1998;13:1996-1998.
  62. Lynch L., Berkowitz R.L. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and coagulation profiles after multifetal pregnancy reduction. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1993;169 (4):987-90.
  63. Senat M.V., Deprest J., Boulvain M., Paupe A., Winer N., Ville Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin trans-fusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(2):136-44.
  64. Challis D., Gratacos E., Deprest J.A. Cord occlu-sion techniques for selective termination in mono-chorionic twins. J Perinat Med.1999;27(5):327-38. Review.
  65. Tsao K., Feldstein V.A., Albanese C.T., Sandberg P.L., Lee H., et al. Selective reduction of acardiac twin by radiofrequency ablation. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2002 ;187(3):635-40.
  66. Lynch L., Berkowitz R.L., Stone J., Alvarez M., Lapinski R. Preterm delivery after selective termina-tion in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol.1996;87(3): 366-9.
  67. Brambati B., Tului L., Baldi M., Guercilena S. Genetic analysis prior to selective fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy: technical aspects and clinical out-come. Hum Reprod.1995;10(4):818-25.
  68. De Catte L., Camus M., Bonduelle M., Liebaers I., Foulon W. Prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus samp-ling in multiple pregnancies prior to fetal reduction. Am J Perinatol.1998;15(5):339-43.
  69. Malone F.D., Kaufman G.E., Chelmow D., Athana-ssiou A., Nores J.A., D'Alton M.E. Maternal morbidity associated with triplet pregnancy. Am J Perinatol.1998; 15(1):73-7.


Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and managed by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution –NonCommercial 4.0 International License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2024 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.