Vol. 19, Issue 3, / July-September 2018
(Review Article, pages 125-132)
PMID: 30167392 (PubMed) - PMCID: PMC6104426

Zahra Rajabi
1- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Virginia, USA
2- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fereshteh Aliakbari
- Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Hossein Yazdekhasti Corresponding Author
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Received: 1/21/2018 Accepted: 6/30/2018 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute

Related Articles


Other Format



Recently, due to tremendous progress in prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of different kinds of malignancies, demands on fertility preservation were raised significantly in developed countries. Fertility failure is one of the most detrimental consequences of radio/cytotoxic treatment procedures in women who could overcome their cancer disease. For women who are involved in cancer diseases, there are multiple options regarding their fertility preservation and those could be selected according to patient’s age, the risk of ovarian involvement, the available time and the type of cancer with different levels of advantages and disadvantages. Although there are multiple options, but embryo cryopreservation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are the most reliable methods for pre-mature and post-mature puberty, respectively. In addition, other approaches like artificial ovary, isolation and cryopreservation of follicles and mature and immature oocyte preservation are under investigations and the success rate of oocyte vitrification is increasing. Therefore, the techniques have the potential to be used in clinic in near future. The presence of comprehensive consultation, before the onset of any kind of cancer treatment procedures, is an indispensable issue which would help patients to make up their mind in choosing the immediate and the best available fertility preservation option.

Keywords: Cancer treatment, Cryopreservation, Embryo, Fertility preservation, Freezing, Oocyte, Ovarian tissue, Transplantation

To cite this article:

Full Text

The incidence rate of cancer among reproductive-age women is 7%, and current cancer treatment methods and strategies have increased survival rate five years following cancer treatment (1, 2). One of the major concerns for women with a history of cancer is infertility issue after malignancy treatments (3). Recently, due to early detection of cancer procedures and tremendous progress that has been made in fertility preservation and dramatic increase of 5 years in survival rate following cancer treatment (4), the demands for fertility preservation in young cancer patients significantly increased (5). Fertility failure is one of the most detrimental consequences of radio/cytotoxic treatment procedures in women who could overcome their cancer disease. Chemotherapy, particularly with alkylating agents such as busulphan, ionizing radiotherapy in the abdomen or pelvic region, gynecological malignancies surgery, can permanently destroy gonads and lead to infertility and premature menopause (6, 7).Therefore, development of fertility preservation strategies helps the patients in having adequate options before experiencing aggressive treatments. Among them, patients with certain benign conditions like autoimmune and hematologic conditions, the presence of bilateral ovarian tumors, severe or recurrent ovarian endometriosis and recurrent ovarian torsion may mostly benefit from the development of such strategies (8, 9).
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has recently updated its guidelines for fertility preservation in cancer patients according to same pregnancy rate results obtained from both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation which were reported by American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) (10). Ovarian transposition and embryo cryopreservation for pubertal female patients were two most common and appropriate fertility preservation strategies before 2013. However, in the current revised guideline of ASCO, oocyte cryopreservation has been recommended as another applicable option for fertility preservation in females at pubertal stage (10). In addition, ovarian cryopreservation is another approach which has a great potential to be an option for cancer patients in the near future. Meanwhile, newly developed promising strategies like In Vitro activation (IVA) of primordial follicles have increased the hopes and allow premature ovarian failure (POF) and primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) patients to conceive using their own eggs (11, 12).
There are different strategies for fertility preservation which can be applied based on patient’s age and status as well as the risk of ovarian involvement (13). Some of these strategies showed their sufficient efficiency, and they are now a part of routine procedures of ART clinics, while others are still under investigation. Also, there are some other conditions in which non-oncological patients may benefit from fertility preservation strategies (14, 15). For example, some patients postpone their parenthood into their fourth and fifth decade of life due to different reasons such as economic situation and industrialization and other conditions in which they are treated with gonadotoxic agents that can lead to premature ovarian failure including some chromosomal abnormalities (Turner’s syndrome) and individuals with severe or recurrent endometriosis as well as ones with autoimmune disorders (14). These strategies are a combination of recent advances in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), cryotechnologies, and novel cell culture systems. In this review, existing fertility preservation strategies besides their advantages and disadvantages were briefly explained and compared, and for a better explanation of each method and its applicability, they were categorized according to the pubertal status of patients (Figure 1).
Adult female patients and fertility preservation options: Most of the possible strategies for fertility preservation in pubertal patients are costly and invasive, and none of them are as reliable as sperm banking in men. There are multiple strategies with different levels of efficiency, applicability, advantages, and disadvantages regarding fertility preservation among adult women at ART centers (Table 1), wherein the recruitment of best options directly depends on the type of cancer, patient’s age, the available time, and whether the likelihood of ovarian involvement is high.
Embryo cryopreservation: Cryopreservation of embryo is the most relevant and well-established option for fertility preservation and was the only method endorsed by the ASRM until 2012. The effectiveness and safety of this option have been proved so that this technique is routinely used in ART centers for infertile women to store supernumerary embryos, prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and in cases of impaired endometrial development and impractical embryo transfer (16, 17). Meanwhile, this should be considered that hyperstimulation regimes, especially estrogen, lead to growth of some hormone-dependent malignancies and some other complications may occur during oocyte retrieval including hemorrhage and infection in patients with low blood counts.
Although the success rate of oocyte vitrification is increasing, embryo cryopreservation, based on obtained satisfactory rate, is still the best option that can be offered to post-pubertal women who desire fertility preservation, especially for those who are mature and have enough time prior to onset of aggressive treatments and have a partner or sperm donor as well. This is noteworthy to mention that transfer of cryopreserved embryos leads to improvement of pregnancy rate compared to fresh embryo transfer strategy, due to improved embryo–endometrium synchrony (18).
Mature or immature oocyte cryopreservation: Cryopreservation of oocyte is another option especially for those women who are single and are not pleasant to have sperm donation. Recent reports are showing that the success rate and efficiency of oocyte vitrification significantly have improved and are comparable with obtained results from fresh oocytes (19, 20). In addition, previous reports indicated that this technique has an overall survival rate of 92.5% and an ongoing pregnancy rate of 43.7% in egg donation programs (21). Meanwhile, there is another strategy especially to avoid any delay due to hyperstimulation, wherein immature oocyte can be retrieved during ovarian tissue cryobanking or oophorectomy (22). Some researchers believe that immature oocytes, metaphase I or germinal vesicle oocytes, are less vulnerable to harmful effects of cooling and cryodamages due to lower cell volume, and lack of metaphase spindle. However, the rate of developmental capacity and pregnancy is low, although the rate of nuclear maturation is still high in the cryopreserved immature oocyte (23, 24). Nevertheless, no similar live births have been reported in cancer patients, at least based on our knowledge, and still further investigation is needed for a routine clinical procedure. 
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Another alternative for fertility preservation in women with oncological and non-oncological diseases is ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) (25). Some studies have shown that immature oocytes within primordial follicles are more resistant to cryopreservation damage (26) and this method has this potential to be a suitable option. However, the main question and concern regarding this technique is how to activate quiescent follicle after freezing and thawing. There are three possible options to address this fundamental issue including ovarian tissue autotransplantation, xenotransplantation and in vitro culture system. In autotransplantation, that is the only clinically applicable strategy at recent, ovarian tissues can be returned to the patient by autotransplantation (Either orthotopically or heterotopically) (27), which would allow natural fertility, but in vitro fertilization still remains an option in case previous methods failed. Although, many investigations have been done to improve OTC efficiency, but the number of live births by this method is still meager, and further investigations are needed to establish this technique as an available option in ART centers, particularly on improvement of revascularization process with the aim of reducing the follicular loss which occurs after tissue grafting (28). The xenotransplantation approach is still a promising method but is problematic because of safety and ethical issues. Recently, huge progress has been made in the culture of immature follicles, mainly using three-dimensional culture strategies (29, 30), which allows overcoming obstacles that exist within the culture of human follicles in vitro. Recently, a new infertility treatment method has been developed called "In vitro activation (IVA)" which allows POF patients to conceive using their own eggs via activation of residual dormant follicles. Multiple pregnancies have been reported using this strategy wherein stimulation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and AKT-forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) pathways followed by disruption of Hippo signaling pathway using ovarian fragmentation, leads to activation of primordial follicle growth and subsequently, ovarian tissue autotransplantation may help to achieve successful pregnancies (11). Also, in another recent achivment, patients with POI underwent the same procedure starting by ovarian vitrification which led to reported successful follicle growth and pregnancies (12).
Based on recent reports, almost 100 children were born or will be born in the near future using OTC. All gestational age and birth weight in these newborns were within internationally recognized normal standards and it can be suggected that frozen-thawed ovarian tissue transplantations is going to be a routine fertility preservation (31).
Oophoropexy: Oophoropexy is an applicable method which is routinely used in clinics for Hodgkin disease and other patients for whom abdominal surgery is necessary before irradiation, in order to minimize harmful effects of ionizing irradiation on ovarian function (32). In this procedure, ovaries are transposed either to under the uterus or out of radiation field and the technique can be immediately performed before onset of scheduled radiotherapy through laparoscopic section (33). Due to direct dependency of fertility preservation results by this method to different variables such as patient’s age, radiation dose, shielded ovaries, use of concomitant chemotherapy (7, 34), in this approach, the efficiency and obtained results are not satisfying and there is risk of other complications which may occur (35). 
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs: In one clinical trial, it was indicated that 94% of treated patients with GnRH agonist showed initiation of spontaneous menstruation within 3–8 months after termination of chemotherapy demonstrating that GnRH agonist can prevent the ovaries from being damaged during chemotherapy (36). Although there is no protective effect of GnRH analogs for primordial follicles from radiation therapy, it has been shown that primordial follicles could be protected from cytotoxic cancer therapy procedures but, its clinical applicability is still controversial (37-39). Protective effects of GnRHa on ovarian function during chemotherapy have been proposed due to granulosa cells mitotic activity reduction following the administration of GnRHa (40) and the inhibition of recruitment process of mice preantral follicles and their growth and development to antral follicles.
Some other promising methods have been recently developed, wherein devastating consequences of radio/cytotoxic treatment procedures are diminished by suppressing apoptosis pathways in the germ cells. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) (41), AS101 (42) and imatinib (43) are examples of such approaches and their future applicabilities require further investigations and clinical trials.
Pediatric and adolescent female patients and fertility preservation options: There are multiple possible options that might be helpful for prepubertal girls to preserve their fertility before the onset of aggressive cancer treatment. Among them, the most applicable and valid option for adolescent female patients is OTC that is considered as an experimental method yet and needs some more investigations and approval by Institutional Review Board (IRB) (10). In the last decay, extensive attempts have been done to successfully crypreserve ovarian tissue in prepubertal girl, but unfortunatley, no live births have been reported yet from ovarian¬ tissue cryopreservation and transplantation from a prepubertal girl. Beside this, there is high risk of reintroduction of original disease after transplantation in these cases indicating the necessity of IVM and artificial ovary methods improvement (9, 44). 
Isolation of follicles from ovarian biopsies and cortical strips is another approach for young patients (45). Even though this approach was partially successful in mice, however, this requires further studies to be completely applicable for patients who suffer from cancer disease. In this method, multiple ovarian biopsies are removed from young patients through either laparoscopy section or oophorectomy and then follicles can be isolated from ovarian tissue and cryopreserved for a long time and following completion of cancer treatment, follicles can be either returned to patients via autotransplantation or thawed and cultured and then matured in vitro to produce offspring by in vitro fertilization. This is worthy to mention that shielding ovaries or oophoropexy is another possible approach, wherein ovaries can be removed from irritation field (46, 47). However, irritation has detrimental effects on the function of the uterus so that the probability of natural pregnancy is significantly reduced following pelvic irradiation (48), although ovarian function can be preserved by this way.
Future perspectives: In a newly developed strategy called "transplantable artificial ovary", for eliminating the the risk of transmission of malignant cells, the isolated primordial follicles are transferred into matrices, mostly using fibrin, and then grafted to the inner part of the peritoneum to create an artificial organ. Advances in isolation and washing procedures prior to encapsulation of primordial follicles have led to impressive achivments in this approach and in some studies resulted in growing of human antral follicles after autografting primordial follicles inside a fibrin scaffold in a mouse model (49, 50).
Recently, another likely option has been proposed, wherein putative ovarian stem cells (Or stem cells from other sources) can be isolated from patient’s ovarian tissues and be differentiated toward competent oocyte either by injecting back into ovarian tissue in vivo or in in vitro culture (51-53). This option is still in its infant stage, and in order to overcome existing controversies in this area, further investigations are needed (54-56).

Current advances and successful reported pregnancies using ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation and artificial ovary and also utilization of multistep culture system of primordial follicles as well as allografting option, have increased hopes in cancer survivors. Following transplantation, follicles loss is one of the results of non-efficient revascularization of the graft and tissue ischemia; however, these consequences could be prevented by using S1P, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH), antioxidants and innovative stem cells therapy approaches (22, 57-61). Regardless of methods mentioned above, IVF using donor oocyte is another approach which is still an option for cancer survivors with diminished ovarian reserve (62). This is definitely vivid that women with cancer should benefit from adequate and useful consultations regarding their fertility preservation options and immediate and correct option selection according to updated guidelines. Therefore, the probability of childbearing after aggressive cancer treatments can be increased.

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicting interest and no financial support for the research and all authors read and approve the final manuscript. 

Figures, Charts, Tables

High Resolution
Figure 1. Recommended fertility preservation approaches in women

Figure 1. Recommended fertility preservation approaches in women

Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of each fertility preservation approaches in women

Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of each fertility preservation approaches in women


  1. Horner M, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review [internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1975-2006 [cited 2018 Jan 21]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/
  2. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101(1):3-27.   [PubMed]
  3. Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4174-83.   [PubMed]
  4. Greenlee RT, Hill‐Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51(1):15-36.   [PubMed]
  5. Kim SS. Oocyte biology in fertility preservation. 1st ed. USA: Springer; 2013. 97 p.
  6. Apperley J, Reddy N. Mechanism and management of treatment-related gonadal failure in recipients of high dose chemoradiotherapy. Blood Rev. 1995;9(2):93-116.   [PubMed]
  7. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(6):535-43.   [PubMed]
  8. Tschudin S, Bitzer J. Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(5):587-97.   [PubMed]
  9. Donnez J. Fertility preservation in women, focusing on cancer, benign diseases and social reasons. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70(4):385-6.   [PubMed]
  10. Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2500-10.   [PubMed]
  11. Kawamura K, Kawamura N, Hsueh AJ. Activation of dormant follicles: a new treatment for premature ovarian failure? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(3):217-22.   [PubMed]
  12. Suzuki N, Yoshioka N, Takae S, Sugishita Y, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, et al. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):608-15.   [PubMed]
  13. Yazdekhasti H, Rajabi Z. Established and Future Promising Fertility Preservation Options in Adolescence and Adults. Int Med Med Investig J. 2017;3(1):1-7.
  14. Gidoni Y, Holzer H, Tulandi T, Tan SL. Fertility preservation in patients with non-oncological conditions. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16(6):792-800.   [PubMed]
  15. Rezaeian Z, Yazdekhasti H, Nasri S, Rajabi Z, Fallahi P, Amidi F. Effect of selenium on human sperm parameters after freezing and thawing procedures. Asian Pac J Reprod. 2016;5(6):462-6.
  16. Bedoschi G, Oktay K. Current approach to fertility preservation by embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1496-502.   [PubMed]
  17. Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Ovarian stimulation in cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1476-84.   [PubMed]
  18. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):156-62.   [PubMed]
  19. Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):277-85.   [PubMed]
  20. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2239-46.   [PubMed]
  21. Cobo A, Remohí J, Chang C-C, Nagy ZP. Oocyte cryopreservation for donor egg banking. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(3):341-6.   [PubMed]
  22. Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Pellicer A, Diaz-Garcia C, Serrano MS, Schmidt KT, et al. Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1503-13.   [PubMed]
  23. Wu J, Zhang L, Wang X. In vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development after ultrarapid freezing of immature human oocytes. Reproduction. 2001;121(3):389-93.   [PubMed]
  24. Toth TL, Lanzendorf SE, Sandow BA, Veeck LL, Hassen WA, Hansen K, et al. Cryopreservation of human prophase I oocytes collected from unstimulated follicles. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(6):1077-82.   [PubMed]
  25. Sánchez M, Alamá P, Gadea B, Soares SR, Simón C, Pellicer A. Fresh human orthotopic ovarian cortex transplantation: long-term results. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):786-91.   [PubMed]
  26. Nugent D, Meirow D, Brook P, Aubard Y, Gosden R. Transplantation in reproductive medicine: previous experience, present knowledge and future prospects. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3(3):267-80.   [PubMed]
  27. Kim SS, Battaglia DE, Soules MR. The future of human ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation: fertility and beyond. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(6):1049-56.   [PubMed]
  28. Dolmans MM, Donnez J, Camboni A, Demylle D, Amorim C, Van Langendonckt A, et al. IVF outcome in patients with orthotopically transplanted ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2778-87.   [PubMed]
  29. Rajabi Z, Yazdekhasti H, Noori Mugahi SMH, Abbasi M, Kazemnejad S, Shirazi A, et al. Mouse preantral follicle growth in 3D co-culture system using human menstrual blood mesenchymal stem cell. Reprod Biol. 2018;18(1):122-31.   [PubMed]
  30. Rajabi Z, Khokhar Z, Yazdekhasti H. The Growth of preantral follicles and the impact of different supplementations and circumstances: a review study with focus on bovine and human preantral follicles. Cell Reprogram. 2018;20(3):164-77.   [PubMed]
  31. Jensen AK, Macklon KT, Fedder J, Ernst E, Humaidan P, Andersen CY. 86 successful births and 9 ongoing pregnancies worldwide in women transplanted with frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: focus on birth and perinatal outcome in 40 of these children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(3):325-36.   [PubMed]
  32. Williams RS, Littell RD, Mendenhall NP. Laparoscopic oophoropexy and ovarian function in the treatment of Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 1999;86(10):2138-42.   [PubMed]
  33. Tulandi T, Al-Took S. Laparoscopic ovarian suspension before irradiation. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(2):381-3.   [PubMed]
  34. Thomas P, Winstanly D, Peckham M, Austin D, Murray M, Jacobs H. Reproductive and endocrine function in patients with Hodgkin's disease: effects of oophoropexy and irradiation. Br J Cancer. 1976;33(2):226-31.   [PubMed]
  35. Hunter M, Glees J, Gazet JC. Oophoropexy and ovarian function in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease. Clin Radiol. 1980;31(1):21-6.   [PubMed]
  36. Blumenfeld Z, Avivi I, Linn S, Epelbaum R, Ben-Shahar M, Haim N. Prevention of irreversible chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in young women with lymphoma by a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist in parallel to chemotherapy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(8):1620-6.   [PubMed]
  37. Pacheco BP, Ribas JM, Milone G, Fernandez I, Kvicala R, Mila T, et al. Use of GnRH analogs for functional protection of the ovary and preservation of fertility during cancer treatment in adolescents: a preliminary report. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81(3):391-7.   [PubMed]
  38. Blumenfeld Z, Avivi I, Ritter M, Rowe JM. Preservation of fertility and ovarian function and minimizing chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity in young women. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1999;6(5):229-39.   [PubMed]
  39. Gosden RG, Wade JC, Fraser HM, Sandow J, Faddy MJ. Impact of congenital or experimental hypogonadotrophism on the radiation sensitivity of the mouse ovary. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2483-8.   [PubMed]
  40. Jr TGD, JENISON EL. Presence and characteristics of receptors for [D-Trp6] luteinizing hormone releasing hormone and epidermal growth factor in human ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol. 1998;12(3):489-98.
  41. Otala M, Suomalainen L, Pentikäinen MO, Kovanen P, Tenhunen M, Erkkilä K, et al. Protection from radiation-induced male germ cell loss by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Biol Reprod. 2004;70(3):759-67.   [PubMed]
  42. Carmely A, Meirow D, Peretz A, Albeck M, Bartoov B, Sredni B. Protective effect of the immunomodulator AS101 against cyclophosphamide-induced testicular damage in mice. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(6):1322-9.   [PubMed]
  43. Gonfloni S, Di Tella L, Caldarola S, Cannata SM, Klinger FG, Di Bartolomeo C, et al. Inhibition of the c-Abl-TAp63 pathway protects mouse oocytes from chemotherapy-induced death. Nat Med. 2009;15(10):1179-85.   [PubMed]
  44. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(17):1657-65.   [PubMed]
  45. Oktay K, Nugent D, Newton H, Salha O, Chatterjee P, Gosden RG. Isolation and characterization of primordial follicles from fresh and cryopreserved human ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(3):481-6.   [PubMed]
  46. Sonmezer M, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in female patients. Human Reprod Update. 2004;10(3):251-66.   [PubMed]
  47. Leporrier M, Von Theobald P, Roffe JL, Muller G. A new technique to protect ovarian function before pelvic irradiation: heterotopic ovarian autotransplantation. Cancer. 1987;60(9):2201-4.   [PubMed]
  48. Donnez J, Kim SS. Principles and practice of fertility preservation. 1st ed. UK: Cambridge university press; 2011. 497 p.
  49. Chiti MC, Dolmans MM, Orellana R, Soares M, Paulini F, Donnez J, et al. Influence of follicle stage on artificial ovary outcome using fibrin as a matrix. Hum Reprod. 2015;31(2):427-35.   [PubMed]
  50. Luyckx V, Dolmans M-M, Vanacker J, Legat C, Moya CF, Donnez J, et al. A new step toward the artificial ovary: survival and proliferation of isolated murine follicles after autologous transplantation in a fibrin scaffold. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(4):1149-56.   [PubMed]
  51. Parvari S, Yazdekhasti H, Rajabi Z, Gerayeli Malek V, Rastegar T, Abbasi M. Differentiation of mouse ovarian stem cells toward oocyte-like structure by coculture with granulosa cells. Cell Reprogram. 2016;18(6):419-28.   [PubMed]
  52. Johnson J, Canning J, Kaneko T, Pru JK, Tilly JL. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature. 2004;428(6979):145-50.   [PubMed]
  53. Asgari HR, Akbari M, Yazdekhasti H, Rajabi Z, Navid S, Aliakbari F, et al. Comparison of human amniotic, chorionic, and umbilical cord multipotent mesenchymal stem cells regarding their capacity for differentiation toward female germ cells. Cell Reprogram. 2017;19(1):44-53.   [PubMed]
  54. Yazdekhasti H, Rajabi Z, Parvari S, Abbasi M. Used protocols for isolation and propagation of ovarian stem cells, different cells with different traits. J Ovarian Res. 2016;9(1):68.   [PubMed]
  55. Yazdekhasti H, Hosseini MA, Rajabi Z, Parvari S, Salehnia M, Koruji M, et al. Improved isolation, proliferation, and differentiation capacity of mouse ovarian putative stem cells. Cell Reprogram. 2017;19(2):132-44.   [PubMed]
  56. Yazdekhasti H, Hosseini J, Rajabi Z, Shirzeyli MH, Aliakbari F. Germline cells derived from mesenchymal stem cells, with the focus on Wharton's jelly. Asian PacJ Reprod. 2018;7(2):49-55.   [Abstract]
  57. Reichman D, Man L, Park L, Lis R, Gerhardt J, Rosenwaks Z, et al. Notch hyper-activation drives trans-differentiation of hESC-derived endothelium. Stem Cell Res. 2016;17(2):391-400.   [PubMed]
  58. Sandler VM, Lis R, Liu Y, Kedem A, James D, Elemento O, et al. Reprogramming human endothelial cells to haematopoietic cells requires vascular induction. Nature. 2014;511(7509):312-8.   [PubMed]
  59. Aliakbari F, Sedighi Gilani MA, Yazdekhasti H, Koruji M, Asgari HR, Baazm M, et al. Effects of antioxidants, catalase and α-tocopherol on cell viability and oxidative stress variables in frozen-thawed mice spermatogonial stem cells. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(1):63-8.   [PubMed]
  60. Aliakbari F, Yazdekhasti H, Abbasi M, Hajian Monfared M, Baazm M. Advances in cryopreservation of spermatogonial stem cells and restoration of male fertility. Microsc Res Tech. 2016;79(2):122-9.   [PubMed]
  61. Aliakbari F, Gilani MA, Amidi F, Baazm M, Korouji M, Izadyar F, et al. Improving the efficacy of cryopreservation of spermatogonia stem cells by antioxidant supplements. Cell Reprogram. 2016;18(2):87-95.   [PubMed]
  62. Polak de Fried E, Notrica J, Rubinstein M, Marazzi A, Gonzalez MG. Pregnancy after human donor oocyte cryopreservation and thawing in association with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a patient with ovarian failure. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(3):555-7.   [PubMed]


Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and managed by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution –NonCommercial 4.0 International License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2024 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.